On 7 Sep 2012, at 13:02, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 13:54, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>> On 09/07/12 12:30, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2012 18:44, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the pkg port installs pkg.
It was a temporary disruption that I caused. It should be fixed now.
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Friday, September 07, 2012 2:41:20 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > I think these would be rare? There's no good reason for anything to write
> > to
> > a shared library that I can think of. install(1) does an atomic rename to
> > swap
> > in the new libraries already.
>
> After a second t
On 09/04/12 18:01, Ryan Stone wrote:
I have a Intel Sandy Bridge system that reports that it has SMT cores
instead of HTT(under a derivative of FreeBSD 8.2). I'll admit that I
don't at all understand the distinction between the two -- I thought
that HTT was just Intel's name for SMT. In any cas
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:53 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:48:19PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:41 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > After a second thought, I do not like your proposal as well. +x is set for
> > > shebang scripts, and a
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:48:19PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:41 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > After a second thought, I do not like your proposal as well. +x is set for
> > shebang scripts, and allowing PROT_EXEC to set VV_TEXT for them means
> > that such scripts
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:41 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> After a second thought, I do not like your proposal as well. +x is set for
> shebang scripts, and allowing PROT_EXEC to set VV_TEXT for them means
> that such scripts are subject for write denial.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
On 07-Sep-2012, Ivan Voras sent:
> Ok, but all that can be done the "normal" way with A records.
>
> As far as I can tell, the intended benefits of the SRV record system
> is to disentangle services and hosts, so that, e.g. the same
> user-visible DNS name (e.g. "pkg.freebsd.org") resolves to a d
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:05:28PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:42:18 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:21:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:02:08 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2
On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:42:18 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:21:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:02:08 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 4,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:46:02PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 09/07/12 17:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-09-07 11:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> Building ports not explicitely enabling USE_GCC=4.6+ are considered
> >> using the system's LLVM/CLANG, which is clang 3.2 in our installation
> >
On 09/07/12 17:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-07 11:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Building ports not explicitely enabling USE_GCC=4.6+ are considered
>> using the system's LLVM/CLANG, which is clang 3.2 in our installation
>> (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240164), but since some ports require the
>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:21:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:02:08 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, September 04, 2012
On Friday, September 07, 2012 12:02:08 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:00:39 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >> 2. I do not see what wou
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:00:39 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 P
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:00:39 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:35:08P
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I found out
On 2012-09-07 11:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
Building ports not explicitely enabling USE_GCC=4.6+ are considered
using the system's LLVM/CLANG, which is clang 3.2 in our installation
(FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240164), but since some ports require the
special ports devel/llvm and lang/clang, LLVM 3.1 a
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 7 September 2012 04:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
On all portupgrades, port installations I receive this error since today
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 r240150M:
make: don't know how to make add-plist-buildinfo. Stop
Did you try searching for the add-plis
On 7 September 2012 04:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On all portupgrades, port installations I receive this error since today
> on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 r240150M:
>
> make: don't know how to make add-plist-buildinfo. Stop
> *** [reinstall] Error code 2
Fixed already. update your ports tree.
--
I just found out, that first call of pkg (which also known as bootstrap)
became interactive, and without options.
This kinda brokes a bit my automated image creation scripts (which builds
images from svn).
Would it be nice to have non-interactive bootstrap, maybe
pkg --bootstrap
or something simil
On 7 September 2012 13:54, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 09/07/12 12:30, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> On 06/09/2012 18:44, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
Hi,
It looks like the pkg port installs pkg.conf.sample with the line:
PACKAGESITE :
On 09/07/12 12:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> It may also be possible to replicate what portupdate has done and use
> geolocation based services to steer end users to a nearby repository
> site automatically.
D'Oh! I meant portsnap of course.
Matthew
_
On 09/07/12 12:30, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 18:44, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It looks like the pkg port installs pkg.conf.sample with the line:
>>>
>>> PACKAGESITE : http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest
>>>
>>> ... which is f
On 06/09/2012 18:44, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like the pkg port installs pkg.conf.sample with the line:
>>
>> PACKAGESITE : http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest
>>
>> ... which is finally a good step in the direction of making pkg
Building ports not explicitely enabling USE_GCC=4.6+ are considered
using the system's LLVM/CLANG, which is clang 3.2 in our installation
(FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r240164), but since some ports require the
special ports devel/llvm and lang/clang, LLVM 3.1 and clang 3.1 get
installed and 3.1 is used
2012/9/6 O. Hartmann :
> Hello.
>
> Creating a port, I need to fectch sources from a site whos URL is
> https://xxx.xxx.xxx.
>
> Doing so, I end up with an "Authentication error". This makes the fetch
> process in the port's Makefile impossible.
>
> I tried to fetch the source tar-ball via "wget(1)
On all portupgrades, port installations I receive this error since today
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 r240150M:
make: don't know how to make add-plist-buildinfo. Stop
*** [reinstall] Error code 2
What is missing?
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
28 matches
Mail list logo
