snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD
Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just take all of
the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5
snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD
Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just take all of
the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote:
K> serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
K>
K>
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/b4TkAWaGPH7GkNH1VxuMJtv5Be3qwMGuK3qX4J5X-tk?feat=directlink
Why didn't you make dump?
db> call doadump
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
_
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote:
> K> serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
> K>
> K>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/b4TkAWaGPH7GkNH1VxuMJtv5Be3qwMGuK3qX4J5X-tk?feat=directlink
>
> Why
serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/b4TkAWaGPH7GkNH1VxuMJtv5Be3qwMGuK3qX4J5X-tk?feat=directlink
--
thanks
-kim
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:20:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
> > kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did an
Am 09/22/12 15:52, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote:
> ...
>> When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002,
>> there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on
>> FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compi
On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002,
there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on
FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compiler only
for compiling my modelling software, but ther
snip
Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a
OpenBSD Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just
take all of the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use
ipfw2.
Darrel
On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
OpenBSD 4.5 v
Hello Dimitry.
Am 09/22/12 13:43, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> ...
>> At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain
>> using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, th
On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
...
At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain
using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, the
echo from the past.
Well, the main idea of these tests is to prov
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
> kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another
> series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also
Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> Hi all,
>
> As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
> kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another
> series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also
> tested the performa
13 matches
Mail list logo
