07.11.2012 01:14, CeDeROM пишет:
> I have also noted that mouse cursor is very often not moving in Xorg
> but it works in the console! I need to move cursor while statrx or
> restart Xorg for mouse to start moving. Is it a bug or feature? :-)
>
> In the xorg.conf:
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identi
TB --- 2012-11-07 02:19:52 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-07 02:19:52 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:27:44PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> For a brief 6 hours and 48 minutes (time between r242667 and r242688), if you
> updated your HEAD source tree, please update it again (to bring
> base/head/sys/boot/ up to r242688 or higher).
>
> r242667 introduced a bugette wherein
For a brief 6 hours and 48 minutes (time between r242667 and r242688), if you
updated your HEAD source tree, please update it again (to bring
base/head/sys/boot/ up to r242688 or higher).
r242667 introduced a bugette wherein if you reboot your system you'll get the
error "can't open '/boot/menu
Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 22:57 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Reference:
> > > From: CeDeROM
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:14:03 +0100
> > > Message-id:
> > >
> >
> > CeDeROM wrote:
> > > I have also noted that mouse cursor is very
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 00:34 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> Isn't this a Xorg bug then? When I have no configuration file Hal
> should
> provide the configuration, so sooner or later the mouse should start
> moving... but is does not..
>
> Do I get http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html correct
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 21:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
Isn't this a Xorg bug then? When I have no configuration file Hal should
provide the configuration, so sooner or later the mouse should start
moving... but is does not..
Do I get http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html correct that
when I am using xorg.conf there is no need for Hal and w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-11-06 17:37:41 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Are there any defines that code can use in #ifdef/#if et al to tell
> it's being compiled with clang?
>
> Vic Abell (lsof author) is cleaning up lsof to compile cleanly
> with clang and would like
On 2012-11-06 23:37, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Are there any defines that code can use in #ifdef/#if et al to tell
it's being compiled with clang?
Vic Abell (lsof author) is cleaning up lsof to compile cleanly with
clang and would like to know, since the
default is now clang on -CURRENT.
Clang def
Are there any defines that code can use in #ifdef/#if et al to tell
it's being compiled with clang?
Vic Abell (lsof author) is cleaning up lsof to compile cleanly with
clang and would like to know, since the
default is now clang on -CURRENT.
Thanks!
Larry Rosenman
Maintainer sysutils/lsof
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 22:57 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Reference:
> > From: CeDeROM
> > Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:14:03 +0100
> > Message-id:
> >
>
> CeDeROM wrote:
> > I have also noted that mouse cursor is very often not moving in Xorg
> > but it work
Hi,
Reference:
> From: CeDeROM
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:14:03 +0100
> Message-id:
>
CeDeROM wrote:
> I have also noted that mouse cursor is very often not moving in Xorg
> but it works in the console! I need to move cursor while statrx or
> restart Xorg for mouse to start
I have also noted that mouse cursor is very often not moving in Xorg
but it works in the console! I need to move cursor while statrx or
restart Xorg for mouse to start moving. Is it a bug or feature? :-)
In the xorg.conf:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Protocol
Okay, Ill try to build the kernel with debug symbols and provide
backtrace if possible. The generic one provided with the distribution
is stripped? Where can I find configuration for release kernel? :-)
Thanks for all hints! :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
+1 - what he said.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 6 November 2012 10:41, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 12:32, CeDeROM wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Please file a bug about the intel wifi crash!
>>
>> Hello Adrian! :-) Should I attach kernel core dump / backtr
TB --- 2012-11-06 17:59:55 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 17:59:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 6 November 2012 12:32, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Please file a bug about the intel wifi crash!
>
> Hello Adrian! :-) Should I attach kernel core dump / backtrace or
> simply write that "kernel crash on unstable wifi connection or when
> switching r
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Please file a bug about the intel wifi crash!
Hello Adrian! :-) Should I attach kernel core dump / backtrace or
simply write that "kernel crash on unstable wifi connection or when
switching radio on and off multiple times or switching wpa_supp
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 11/06/12 14:42, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > It appears that we've (mostly) cleaned up the clang/system interface
> > such that sysutils/lsof works with cc as clang.
> >
> > Can someone tell me what we need to do to shut these up?
> >
> >
> > # LSOFCC=
On 11/06/12 14:42, Larry Rosenman wrote:
It appears that we've (mostly) cleaned up the clang/system interface
such that sysutils/lsof works with cc as clang.
Can someone tell me what we need to do to shut these up?
# LSOFCC=cc CC=cc make LSOFCC=cc CC=cc
===> lsof-4.87.a,7 depends on file: /usr
Please file a bug about the intel wifi crash!
adrian
On 6 November 2012 05:31, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello world! :-)
>
> After big shock with new organization of 9.0 and some mobilization to
> take part in RC I have tested 9.1-RC{1,2,3} and found no bigger issues
> so far from user perspective :-
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:31 AM, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:36:46 PM Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> On 06.11.2012 12:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann
> wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 13:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 11/06/12 14:26, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 20:52, Brooks Davis a écrit :
I've made clang the default on x86 systems. There will probably be a
few bumps as we work out the last kinks including a ABI issue for i386
system libraries, but the transition is expected to be fairly smoo
Le 6 nov. 2012 à 15:10, Niclas Zeising a écrit :
> On 11/06/12 14:26, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Le 5 nov. 2012 à 20:52, Brooks Davis a écrit :
>>
>>> I've made clang the default on x86 systems. There will probably be a
>>> few bumps as we work out the last kinks including a ABI issue for i386
Hello world! :-)
After big shock with new organization of 9.0 and some mobilization to
take part in RC I have tested 9.1-RC{1,2,3} and found no bigger issues
so far from user perspective :-)
Also the installation method is now more familiar than before as I got
used to it - its nice that message
Le 5 nov. 2012 à 20:52, Brooks Davis a écrit :
> I've made clang the default on x86 systems. There will probably be a
> few bumps as we work out the last kinks including a ABI issue for i386
> system libraries, but the transition is expected to be fairly smooth for
> most users.
>
> Please repo
Le 6 nov. 2012 à 12:42, Andre Oppermann a écrit :
> On 06.11.2012 12:02, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Luigi,
>>>
>>> do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
>>> of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
>>>
>> If you have only one i
On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:36:46 PM Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 06.11.2012 12:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann
wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >> Hi Luigi,
> >>
> >> do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
> >> of interru
On 06.11.2012 12:02, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
If you have only one interface yes polling is not really necessary.
If you have 10 interfaces the inter
On 06.11.2012 12:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
yes, we should let it rest in peace.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
> Hi Luigi,
>
> do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
> of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
yes, we should let it rest in peace.
One part of the NIC-polling framework
TB --- 2012-11-06 09:48:34 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 09:48:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
>>
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
> of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
>
If you have only one interface yes polling is not really necessary.
If you have 10 interfaces the interrupt moderation threshold is ha
In message <5098e8b4.5040...@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes:
>> I think it should go away, and if there still is a relevant
>> usage segment, be replaced by _real_ "device-polling" which is
>> not tied to the network stack.
>
>Don't we already have the equivalent with a fast interru
On 06.11.2012 11:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <5098e526.6070...@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes:
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
Can I just point out, tha
In message <5098e526.6070...@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes:
>Hi Luigi,
>
>do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
>of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
Can I just point out, that what we have is not in fact "device-polling"
On 05.11.2012 17:57, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I thought it was, loo
In message <20121106085614.gk70...@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
>T> buildworld fails for me.
Somebody should run src/tools/tools/build_option_survey
before/after and look for options that breaks due to CLANG
Apart from that: Thanks for getting us moved to CLANG, I've
been wishi
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:19:18AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:52:33PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
T> B> I've made clang the default on x86 systems. There will probably be a
T> B> few bumps as we work out the last kinks including a ABI issue for i386
T> B> system libra
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-11-06 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
48 matches
Mail list logo
