[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-11-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-11-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-11-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 05:45:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 05:45:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: syscall cost freebsd vs linux ?

2012-11-26 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 11/19/12 11:32 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > today i was comparing the performance of some netmap-related code > on FreeBSD and Linux (RELENG_9 vs 3.2) and i was surprised to see that > our system calls are significantly slower. > On comparable hardware (i7-2600k vs E5-1650) the syscall > getppid() t

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-11-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-27 04:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: syscall cost freebsd vs linux ?

2012-11-26 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 26 November 2012 15:39, Lukasz Wojcik wrote: > On 11/19/12 20:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >> today i was comparing the performance of some netmap-related code >> on FreeBSD and Linux (RELENG_9 vs 3.2) and i was surprised to see that >> our system calls are significantly slower. >> On comparable h

Re: syscall cost freebsd vs linux ?

2012-11-26 Thread Luigi Rizzo
a quick and easy way is to run the syscall in a tight loop for a sufficient long time (1s or more) and use "time" to measure it. At 100ns per call you need about 10M cycles to do one second. cheers luigi On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Lukasz Wojcik wrote: > On 11/19/12 20:32, Luigi Rizzo wr

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

2012-11-26 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:31:34AM -0800, sig6247 wrote: Just checked out r243529, this only happens when the kernel is compiled by clang, and only on i386, either recompiling the kernel with gcc or booting from a UFS root works fine. Is it a kno

Samsung 830 and ZFS TRIM

2012-11-26 Thread Johannes Dieterich
Hello, (initially posted this to -questions@ a week ago, w/o reply) I installed CURRENT on a new Thinkpad equipped with a Samsung 830 SSD: ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-9 SATA 3.x device ada0: 600.000MB/s transfers (SATA 3.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing

Re: About 802.1Q tag

2012-11-26 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Kohji, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:54:14AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: K> Would someone check the following code? K> K> If the hardware do not process an 802.1Q tag, the kernel repacks mbuf K> in line 578-580. But, `struct ether_header *eh' was assigned at line 484. K> K> And, in line 611-637, be

Re: after upgrade, can't restart apache via cron

2012-11-26 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:37:54PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > "Michael W. Lucas" wrote > in <20121123031753.ga59...@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org>: > > mw> eval: setfib: not found > mw> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22: WARNING: failed to start apache22 > mw> > mw> If I run /usr/local/etc/rc.

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

2012-11-26 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:31:34AM -0800, sig6247 wrote: > > Hi, > > Just checked out r243529, this only happens when the kernel is compiled > by clang, and only on i386, either recompiling the kernel with gcc or > booting from a UFS root works fine. Is it a known problem? It looks like that clan

Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax.

2012-11-26 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Paul, On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 02:11:32PM -, Paul Webster wrote: P> I only really need one question answered in honesty; P> P> I personally think that by forking our own version of PF we have P> essentially made something totally different to what everyone wants to P> use. Which is fine,

clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

2012-11-26 Thread sig6247
Hi, Just checked out r243529, this only happens when the kernel is compiled by clang, and only on i386, either recompiling the kernel with gcc or booting from a UFS root works fine. Is it a known problem? Thanks, -- WARNING: WI

Re: syscall cost freebsd vs linux ?

2012-11-26 Thread Lukasz Wojcik
On 11/19/12 20:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote: today i was comparing the performance of some netmap-related code on FreeBSD and Linux (RELENG_9 vs 3.2) and i was surprised to see that our system calls are significantly slower. On comparable hardware (i7-2600k vs E5-1650) the syscall getppid() takes about

Re: About 802.1Q tag

2012-11-26 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:54:14AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: > Hi, > > Would someone check the following code? > > If the hardware do not process an 802.1Q tag, the kernel repacks mbuf > in line 578-580. But, `struct ether_header *eh' was assigned at line 484. > > And, in line 611-637, because o