i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in freebsd, if YES kindly guid me
how i can test it on my own PC.
Thanks
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in freebsd, if YES kindly guid me
how i can test it on my own PC.
This question seems almost so simple as to be a trick question. By
definition, put two ethernet cards in your
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
OK. A better question. About the only caution I can give here (assuming
you don't mean something more interesting like vlans and whatnot) is that
if both
Kindly will u give me example with cammand line, which can test on my
freebsd machine, i want two ips 192.168.1.100 and 192.169.1.100 to be work
on single network interface, my default interface for network is arge0
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
On
For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
ports/164239: [PATCH] mail/thunderbird: crash with nss_ldap
Even with the suggested patch
Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
ports/164239: [PATCH] mail/thunderbird: crash
Hi,
Just updated to the latest CURRENT. Got this during boot:
(sorry for the large image)
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/r248090_panic.jpg
--
Joel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:39:20AM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote:
Hi,
Just updated to the latest CURRENT. Got this during boot:
(sorry for the large image)
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/r248090_panic.jpg
This is fixed with r248093.
--
Joel
___
On CURRENT, r248093, build of kernel fails due to the below shown error.
[...]
cc -c -O3 -O3 -Wno-error=unused-variable -fno-strict-aliasing
-march=native -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 03:04:00 -0500
Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
it should work with alias of ifconfig
Erich
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know
Going by Zaphod's recommendation of using a /32 for each IP, how about this?
ifconfig arge0 inet 192.168.1.100/32
ifconfig arge0 alias 192.169.1.100/32
I wouldn't recommend 192.169, though - only 192.168.x.x is reserved
for private networks, and 192.169 is a valid IP-routable prefix,
assigned to
i want to have differnet ips`s and each should have different interface, it
could be a virtual interface. like u can made it like
*ifconfig arge0.1 create*
but each ip should able to access from differnet machine
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote:
Going by
TB --- 2013-03-09 11:30:25 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 11:30:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, KT Sin kt...@acm.org wrote:
pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390r2=247919
I think the correct fix is committed with:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248102
Hiren
# gdb ./pw
Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, KT Sin kt...@acm.org wrote:
pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390r2=247919
I think the correct fix is committed with:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 11:59:21AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On CURRENT, r248093, build of kernel fails due to the below shown error.
[...]
cc -c -O3 -O3 -Wno-error=unused-variable -fno-strict-aliasing
...
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror
saw the commit an hour ago. rebuilt libutil.so.9 and unfortunately it still
crashes for me :(
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
From: hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: kt...@acm.org
Cc: freebsd-current
On 09.03.13 15:52, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, KT Sin kt...@acm.org wrote:
pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390r2=247919
I think the correct fix is
ah, this is a different problem. one quick workaround is to comment out the
unused variable ic :P, or you could include INVARIANTS in your kernel config,
or you could ping adrian :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
But neither r248102 nor r248103 compile!
ah. my apologies. rebuilt the new libutil again and it seems that r248012 does
indeed resolve the problem. :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, KT Sin kt...@acm.org wrote:
From: KT Sin kt...@acm.org
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com, d...@freebsd.org
Cc:
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error shown below.
The box is compiled with CLANG (buildworld/kernel).
It doesn't matter whether I compile
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error shown below.
…
checking
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
but this time, the port gets deleted and - fails to compile (tried
310.32 and 313.26, the latter worked for me before very well).
The compilation
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to your pr. Did you tried that?
If I understand correctly, it should be fixed in r248061
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to your pr. Did you tried that?
If I
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:45:
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to
Am 03/09/13 17:02, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the
Am 03/09/13 17:46, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:45:
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis
via
/etc/src.conf setting of
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:06:05PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
No, it isn't. Same error, system is at revision:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r248106: Sat Mar 9 16:44:58 CET 2013 amd64
The error is the same.
...
Please see the message I posted to ports@, a copy of which may be found
at
TB --- 2013-03-09 13:41:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 13:41:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Oh, you specifically need them to have different interfaces? That's a
bit more complicated. I guess you could rig something with netgraph
(ngctl and such), but I'm not familiar with it...
--
Daniel Nebdal
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
i want to have
This one was fixed.
Adrian
On 9 March 2013 09:56, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon
Am 03/09/13 18:07, schrieb David Wolfskill:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:06:05PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
No, it isn't. Same error, system is at revision:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r248106: Sat Mar 9 16:44:58 CET 2013 amd64
The error is the same.
...
Please see the message I posted to
On 2013-03-09 10:25, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
Am 03/09/13 23:21, schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
On 2013-03-09 10:25, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
FreeBSD versions and
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote:
i want to have differnet ips`s and each should have different interface,
it could be a virtual interface. like u can made it like
*ifconfig arge0.1 create*
but each ip should able to access from differnet machine
This
With the changing of the vm_object mutex to a rwlock, the VirtualBox
drivers (emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod) need the attached patch to run,
imb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 03/09/13 21:58, Michael Butler wrote:
With the changing of the vm_object mutex to a rwlock, the VirtualBox
drivers (emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod) need the attached patch to run,
imb
*** src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c~ Sat Mar
9 21:15:12 2013
---
TB --- 2013-03-10 03:10:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-10 03:10:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
if I break the build again before bsdcan, I promise I'll buy a nice
bottle of scotch and distribute small quantities to developers who
ask.
Adrian
On 9 March 2013 20:38, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: adrian
Date: Sun Mar 10 04:38:06 2013
New Revision: 248127
URL:
42 matches
Mail list logo
