Here is my /etc/rc.conf
ipv6_enable="YES"
#ip6addrctl_enable="YES"
#ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer"
#ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES"
wlans_iwn0="wlan0"
ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP"
rc.d system said ipv6_enable is obsoleted by
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces.
So, I tried to replaced ipv6_enable with i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-08-15 15:30:49 -0400, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:12:52PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 2013, at 20:36, Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>>> Does the linux box defaults to pentium or higher for -march ?
>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:12:52PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2013, at 20:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Does the linux box defaults to pentium or higher for -march ?
> > 64 bit atomics cannot be implemented in usermode on i386 on
> > processors which do not have cmpxchg8b instr
On Aug 15, 2013, at 20:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> Alternatively, we could attempt to figure out why gcc doesn't want to
>> inline those 64 bit builtins on FreeBSD. It seems to have no problem
>> doing so on the first Linux b
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Alternatively, we could attempt to figure out why gcc doesn't want to
> inline those 64 bit builtins on FreeBSD. It seems to have no problem
> doing so on the first Linux box I tried...
Does the linux box defaults to pentium or hig
Oh, _this_ is the cause! Cool. I wondered about it.
Thanks for chasing this down!
-adrian
On 15 August 2013 11:13, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2013, at 15:15, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> ...
> > on my builder I have consistent error:
> >
> >
> /usr/obj/i386.i386/FreeBSD/pristine/src.
On Jul 28, 2013, at 15:15, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
...
> on my builder I have consistent error:
>
> /usr/obj/i386.i386/FreeBSD/pristine/src.current/usr.bin/svn/svn/../lib/libsvn_subr/libsvn_subr.a(named_atomic.o):
>
> In function `svn_named_atomic__cmpxchg':
> named_atomic.c:(.text+0xed): unde
Hm, do we disable building the base with ICONV support in -HEAD?
I'd like to trim it out so I can slim down embedded builds.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 10 August 2013 10:33, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I've been tinkering with the nvi refresh from the GSoC in 2011, aka nvi2.
>
> https://www.google-melan