[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-31 02:53:29 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-31 02:53:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-31 01:26:59 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-31 01:26:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [PATCH] Adjust binutils to quiesce -Wstring-plus-int

2013-10-30 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:40:40PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Spent some time doing string maths today. > > > > More or less, change the "static char intel_syntax" to an int and use it > > as an array index instead of doing pointer math. > >

Re: [PATCH] Adjust binutils to quiesce -Wstring-plus-int

2013-10-30 Thread Eitan Adler
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > Spent some time doing string maths today. > > More or less, change the "static char intel_syntax" to an int and use it > as an array index instead of doing pointer math. > > Sean > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/binutils_opcodes.txt While

MACHINE_CPU detection b0rked?

2013-10-30 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi, Judging from /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, it knows about both "core" and "core2" and should be able to give me the list of features these CPUs support. However, I'm puzzled: $ make -V MACHINE_CPU CPUTYPE=core2 ssse3 sse3 sse2 sse i686 mmx i586 i486 $ fmake -V MACHINE_CPU CPUTYPE=cor

Re: Using a swap file

2013-10-30 Thread Hiroki Sato
Rostislav Krasny wrote in : ro> But I have no 'late' option in my /etc/fstab: ro> ro> root@saturn:~ # cat /etc/fstab ro> # DeviceMountpointFStypeOptionsDumpPass# ro> /dev/ada0s2a/ufsrw11 ro> mdnoneswapsw,file=/swapf

Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

2013-10-30 Thread Bryan Drewery
We are pleased to announce that official binary packages are now available for pkg, the next generation package management tool for FreeBSD. Pkg allows you to either use ports with portmaster/portupgrade or to have binary remote packages without ports. We have binary packages available for i386 a

Re: [PATCH] Adjust binutils to quiesce -Wstring-plus-int

2013-10-30 Thread Eric van Gyzen
On 10/30/2013 07:49 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: Spent some time doing string maths today. More or less, change the "static char intel_syntax" to an int and use it as an array index instead of doing pointer math. Sean http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/binutils_opcodes.txt Looks good to me. Thanks

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-30 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:08:17AM +0400, Boris Bobrov wrote: > > Can any of you suggest a way to reproduce the bug on a livecd reliably? > > I'll rephrase that: > > Can anybody suggest a way to reproduce the bug on a livecd reliably, if > you ever met the bug before? > I have not been able to

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 19:40:21 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 19:40:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-30 Thread Boris Bobrov
В сообщении от Thursday 31 of October 2013 02:01:41 Boris написал: > В сообщении от Tuesday 29 of October 2013 15:09:57 Gleb написал: > > Hello, > > > > [adding Boris to Cc, who reported same issue in private email] > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote: >

[PATCH] Adjust binutils to quiesce -Wstring-plus-int

2013-10-30 Thread Sean Bruno
Spent some time doing string maths today. More or less, change the "static char intel_syntax" to an int and use it as an array index instead of doing pointer math. Sean http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/binutils_opcodes.txt signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-30 Thread dt71
Sean Bruno wrote, On 10/30/2013 23:14: On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 22:24 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Thank you for the explanation. Is there a trivial way to abort building all the objects or fail if one fails? Or is this done in parallel? This is done automatically, no ? Bmake seems to be

Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-30 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 22:24 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Thank you for the explanation. Is there a trivial way to abort > building > > all the objects or fail if one fails? Or is this done in parallel? > > This is done automatically, no ? > Bmake seems to be more advanced in this regard

Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

2013-10-30 Thread Boris Bobrov
В сообщении от Tuesday 29 of October 2013 15:09:57 Gleb написал: > Hello, > > [adding Boris to Cc, who reported same issue in private email] > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote: > M> I've encountered problems with installing FreeBSD-10.0-BETA1 i386 > under M> V

Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:19:49AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 00:06 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Second, why on earth does a buildworld emit this warning 6 times? > > Its > > > as though bmake things it needs to compile it repeatedly, and its > > not > > > the only

Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times?

2013-10-30 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 00:06 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Second, why on earth does a buildworld emit this warning 6 times? > Its > > as though bmake things it needs to compile it repeatedly, and its > not > > the only such time I've seen this across the tree. This probably > means > > I d

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 14:54:59 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 14:54:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 13:29:12 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 13:29:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 12:36:25 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 12:36:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [RFC] libdispatch (aka Grand Central Dispatch) in base

2013-10-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:33:58PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-10-29 22:29, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2013 7:21 PM, "Teske, Devin" wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Oct

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-10-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-10-30 07:40:24 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-30 07:40:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: New iSCSI stack.

2013-10-30 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Bezüglich Edward Tomasz Napierała's Nachricht vom 11.09.2013 23:14 (localtime): > I'm working on last few minor nits to get this into the tree. Give me few > days, > I'll prepare a patch against 9-STABLE. Hello, I was highly interested in testing the new iscsi stack with 9-stable. Could you pr