Andrey,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:07:35PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
A There is a problem in recent -current to build ipfw with WITHOUT_PF
A option, introduced in r257215. altq.c file produce error due to included
A net/pfvar.h have following includes
A
A #include netpfil/pf/pf.h
A #include
Hi.
There is a problem in recent -current to build ipfw with WITHOUT_PF
option, introduced in r257215. altq.c file produce error due to included
net/pfvar.h have following includes
#include netpfil/pf/pf.h
#include netpfil/pf/pf_altq.h
#include netpfil/pf/pf_mtag.h
and netpfil/pf directory is
On 23.11.2013 12:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Andrey,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:07:35PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
A There is a problem in recent -current to build ipfw with WITHOUT_PF
A option, introduced in r257215. altq.c file produce error due to included
A net/pfvar.h have following
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:20:40PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
A On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:07:35PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
A A There is a problem in recent -current to build ipfw with WITHOUT_PF
A A option, introduced in r257215. altq.c file produce error due to included
A A net/pfvar.h
Hi *
Anyone else seeing panics like this?
This is CURRENT, amd64, 2 CPUs, source synced on Thursday 21st Nov evening GMT
sometime.
+panic: uma_zalloc_arg: Returning an empty bucket.
+cpuid = 1
+KDB: stack backtrace:
+db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
On 23 Nov, Mark Robert Vaughan Murray wrote:
Hi *
Anyone else seeing panics like this?
This is CURRENT, amd64, 2 CPUs, source synced on Thursday 21st Nov evening
GMT sometime.
+panic: uma_zalloc_arg: Returning an empty bucket.
+cpuid = 1
+KDB: stack backtrace:
On 23 Nov 2013, at 10:24, Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 23 Nov, Mark Robert Vaughan Murray wrote:
Hi *
Anyone else seeing panics like this?
This is CURRENT, amd64, 2 CPUs, source synced on Thursday 21st Nov evening
GMT sometime.
+panic: uma_zalloc_arg: Returning an empty
Hi!
I tried to build some programs on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 and as they told me there
is not a problem to build on FreeBSD 9.2 for example (amd64) but on my system
doesn't work:
math/sage
k3b-kde4
multimedia/vlc
audio/last.fm
There are more but the above four I like to have.
What is your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After SVN r258501, I get ..
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 (all)
- --- cc1-dummy ---
cc -O2 -pipe -DGCCVER=\4.2\ -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
- -DPREFIX=\/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr\
- -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../cc_tools
-
On 23.11.2013 22:23, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After SVN r258501, I get ..
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 (all)
- --- cc1-dummy ---
cc -O2 -pipe -DGCCVER=\4.2\ -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
- -DPREFIX=\/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr\
-
I upgraded my 11.0-CURRENT machine to r258504 to get past the uma panic
that I stumbled across earlier. Now I got this when I started upgrading
ports:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
Fatal double fault:
eip = 0xc0b158e0
esp = 0xe4f62000
ebp = 0xe4f62010
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:36:16 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:36:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:27:51 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:27:51 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:44:27 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-11-24 07:44:27 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
14 matches
Mail list logo