Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 21:27 +0200:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:32 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> > Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 15:20 +0200:
> > > Well, I did not look at network stack for long time, so the following
> > > things
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:32 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 15:20 +0200:
> > Well, I did not look at network stack for long time, so the following
> > things could be obsolete now, but at least:
> >
> > (1) There is some room left in mbuf h
Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 15:20 +0200:
> Well, I did not look at network stack for long time, so the following
> things could be obsolete now, but at least:
>
> (1) There is some room left in mbuf header on its allocation, so protocols
> (link) headers can be added
Well, I did not look at network stack for long time, so the following
things could be obsolete now, but at least:
(1) There is some room left in mbuf header on its allocation, so protocols
(link) headers can be added in the front of data without need of
reallocation or data copying. The size of th
After reading that line more carefully, I wonder if this behavior is really
intentional here.
It seems to me that `SO_RCVLOWAT` is supposed to set watermark value in
terms of
packet data bytes, not just raw packet size. And this is how `NOTE_LOWAT`
actually
works there, right?
Could anyone please
Guess I know the answer:
https://cloudup.com/cCkjLhI4M2r
Basically, OSX is checking `kn_data` and FreeBSD is using
`so->so_rcv.sb_cc`.
Thank you anyway!
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to figure out, why this code:
>
> https://github.com/indutny/0
Hello!
I'm trying to figure out, why this code:
https://github.com/indutny/0-udp
Which basically sends a 0-length UDP packet to a server and polls
kqueue events on the server fd.
Return 1 kevent on FreeBSD, and blocks indefinitely without
returning any events on OSX.
So far I could see that Fr
