Jenkins build is back to normal : FreeBSD_HEAD #2755

2015-05-11 Thread jenkins-admin
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2755/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Lars Engels
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn something new, which

Jenkins build became unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #1025

2015-05-11 Thread jenkins-admin
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/1025/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Jos Backus
On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better tools are

Re: nmount, mountd drops high order MNT_xx flags during a mount update

2015-05-11 Thread David Boyd
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 09:07 -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Oops, I did my usual and forgot to attach the patch. Here it is, rick - Original Message - Doug Rabson wrote: You could add a single integer-valued vfsopt which holds the high-order bits of f_flags? I have

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #1026

2015-05-11 Thread jenkins-admin
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/1026/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:12:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 9:10 AM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Sat, May 09, 2015 at

Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #1027

2015-05-11 Thread jenkins-admin
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/1027/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Race VT+X11 on -current

2015-05-11 Thread Ed Maste
On 10 May 2015 at 13:14, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote: Your patch is correct from what I can see. Signed modulus can be creepy sometimes! Better if VT_MAXWINDOWS was power of two and we used a bitwise AND. The patch is correct, although signedness doesn't come into play. The

Increase BUFSIZ to 8192

2015-05-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I would like to change the default value of BUFSIZ to 8192. After testing various applications that uses BUFSIZ like changing it in libmd I can often see performance improvements: For example with md5(1): Current BUFSIZ (1024) 0.13 real 0.04 user 0.09 sys New BUFSIZ (8192)

Re: Increase BUFSIZ to 8192

2015-05-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
So I'm curious - why's it faster? -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Increase BUFSIZ to 8192

2015-05-11 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Baptiste Daroussin wrote this message on Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:06 +0200: I would like to change the default value of BUFSIZ to 8192. After testing various applications that uses BUFSIZ like changing it in libmd I can often see performance improvements: For example with md5(1): Current

Re: Turbulence in head @r282676.

2015-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:17:03AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 12:39, Alan Cox wrote: This is fixed in r282706. The r282694 snapshots (amd64 at least) are useless because of this bug and was causing me constant crashing. ... On a positive note, my update

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:27 -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 9:21 AM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:12:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 9:10 AM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Jos Backus
On May 11, 2015 9:21 AM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:12:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 9:10 AM, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11,

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to import Fossil. RCS has too

Re: Turbulence in head @r282676.

2015-05-11 Thread Mark Felder
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 12:39, Alan Cox wrote: This is fixed in r282706. The r282694 snapshots (amd64 at least) are useless because of this bug and was causing me constant crashing. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread Jos Backus
On May 11, 2015 9:33 AM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote: [snip] And now you’re moving beyond missing the point and just trolling. Thanks for the ad hominen, David. You continue to make my point. Over and out, Jos David ___

Weird problem with rand_harvestq

2015-05-11 Thread sadegh solati
Hi, I am using FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789. the following lines are a section of ps command out put on my server. as you see in second line rand_harvestq made completely busy one core my four cores CPU . The OS got very slow and top output doesn't show cpu usage . top output

Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

2015-05-11 Thread David Chisnall
On 11 May 2015, at 17:27, Jos Backus j...@catnook.com wrote: I didn't miss anything. My point is that debating to update one piece of obsolete software with another is silly, and that FreeBSD should try to move forward in this area. But that's hard, as your response indicates. Steve is