Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Seems like there is some problem with 'toolchain' target in the latest head.
Output of running `make toolchain TARGET=i386` on amd64 system can be found
here: http://dpaste.com/3RD3C4V
AFAICS, it still worked as of r283188.
There has been a clang
On 17/06/2015 23:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Seems like there is some problem with 'toolchain' target in the latest head.
Output of running `make toolchain TARGET=i386` on amd64 system can be found
here: http://dpaste.com/3RD3C4V
AFAICS, it still worked as of r283188.
--
Andriy Gapon
Seems like there is some problem with 'toolchain' target in the latest head.
Output of running `make toolchain TARGET=i386` on amd64 system can be found
here: http://dpaste.com/3RD3C4V
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1113 - Failure:
Check console output at
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1113/ to view the results.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:32:16PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
The system boots the 11-CURRENT kernel in safe mode (not sure if it???s
the kern.mp.disabled or kern.eventtimer.periodic that???s causing that),
On 2015-06-17 13:39, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:32:16PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
The system boots the 11-CURRENT kernel in safe mode (not sure if it???s
the kern.mp.disabled or
Hi Kevin,
you signed up as tester of urtw(4). I have converted urtw(4)
and uploaded new patch at:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2655
Please try, report and update the project page.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/projects/ifnet/net80211
Thanks a lot for your help with the project.
--
Totus
Hi all,
I’m trying to upgrade an old Sony VAIO laptop from 10.1 to -CURRENT. Everything
seemed to work well with 10.1, but on -CURRENT I get no further in the boot
than:
```
ACPI: No DMAR table found
Event timer “LAPIC” quality 600
ACPI APIC Table: Sony VAIO
```
If I disable ACPI, I get:
```
There was some talks back on 2011/2012 about this option, that kernel
should include it, but there is no such option (you can see at least
PR#163630 about this).
Also I've not found any commit which adds this option and no code in kernel
which depends on it.
Is note about this option should be
On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:53 PM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should be no any %FF, but single char in pre libxo ls or nothing in post
libxo one.
Use
LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R
before touch command. It looks like you create file with name %FF instead.
No difference:
fbsdvm64% env
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:07:24AM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
Hi all,
I???m trying to upgrade an old Sony VAIO laptop from 10.1 to -CURRENT.
Everything seemed to work well with 10.1, but on -CURRENT I get no further in
the boot than:
```
ACPI: No DMAR table found
Event timer
On 17 June 2015 at 15:00, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com wrote:
There was some talks back on 2011/2012 about this option, that kernel
should include it, but there is no such option (you can see at least
PR#163630 about this).
Also I've not found any commit which adds this option and no code
On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Show bootverbose dmesg.
Is that different from the “Verbose” option in the loader menu? When I do a
loader-menu-driven verbose boot, I see:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2eLORKzuvdOZ1I4SVB0aFNSenM
Jon
--
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:19:14PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Show bootverbose dmesg.
Is that different from the ???Verbose??? option in the loader menu? When I do
a loader-menu-driven verbose boot,
On Jun 17, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 17.06.2015 16:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:53 PM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Should be no any %FF, but single char in pre libxo ls or nothing
in post libxo one.
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:19:14PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Show bootverbose dmesg.
Is that different from the
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:32:16PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
The system boots the 11-CURRENT kernel in safe mode (not sure if it???s the
kern.mp.disabled or kern.eventtimer.periodic that???s causing that), after
which `dmesg -a` produces the following output:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.06.2015 16:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:53 PM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Should be no any %FF, but single char in pre libxo ls or nothing
in post libxo one.
Use LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R before touch
18 matches
Mail list logo
