Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On 24.09.2015 14:37, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > For example, host with 3TB of RAM, booted from small SSD. > This SSD have 16GB slice for dumping. This is sufficent if trouble > happen at boot time. This is insuuficient if trouble happen later, > after using all 3TB. rc.d script can be used for

Re: Add isboot iSCSI boot driver to FreeBSD

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 05:21:00PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote: > On Sep 23, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Edward Tomasz Napierala > wrote: > > > On 0923T0916, John Nielsen wrote: > >> On Sep 23, 2015, at 2:12 AM, Yonas Yanfa wrote: > >> > >>> isboot is a iSCSI boot

Re: Add isboot iSCSI boot driver to FreeBSD

Hi! > Proposed port here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203294 With some patch for 11 and 9, it's now committed. Thanks everyone! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I do not have a strong opinion. Either option, rc.d/dumpon change or > > geom_dev > > change, is fine with me. > > I added the ability to set dumpdev via loader. But I wasn't aware

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On 24.09.2015 14:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> I do not have a strong opinion. Either option, rc.d/dumpon change or >>> geom_dev >>> change, is fine with me. >> >> I added the

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:27:13PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 24.09.2015 14:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > >> On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> I do not have a strong opinion. Either option,

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:37:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 24.09.2015 14:37, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > For example, host with 3TB of RAM, booted from small SSD. > > This SSD have 16GB slice for dumping. This is sufficent if trouble > > happen at boot time. This is insuuficient if

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On 24.09.2015 14:45, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:37:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> On 24.09.2015 14:37, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> For example, host with 3TB of RAM, booted from small SSD. >>> This SSD have 16GB slice for dumping. This is sufficent if

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > I do not have a strong opinion. Either option, rc.d/dumpon change or geom_dev > change, is fine with me. I added the ability to set dumpdev via loader. But I wasn't aware that it was used in rc.d script. If you have set dumpdev kenv, it will be already

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On 24/09/2015 14:56, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > 1. If you did set dumpdev from loader prompt or from /boot/loader.conf, > and you didn't configured it in rc.conf, then this choice will be > applied by geom_dev. Then it will be applied again by rc.d/dumpon. > > 2. If you did set dumpdev from

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1473 - Fixed

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1473 - Fixed: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1473/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1473/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1473/console Change summaries:

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:56:55PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 24.09.2015 14:45, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:37:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > >> On 24.09.2015 14:37, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> For example, host with 3TB of RAM, booted from

Re: Port compilation fails on HEAD. works on 9 and 10 STABLE

Hi! > > > Try dropping the attached patch in net/mediatomb/files. I submitted it > > > in March, in PR198436: > > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198436 > > > > Eh, now with an actual patch. :) > > Thanks, helps to build it. Still fails on 9.3a, but I *have* to go >

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:18:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > I do not have a strong opinion. Either option, rc.d/dumpon change or > > > geom_dev > > > change, is fine

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:11:51AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:18:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > > >

Re: dumpdev in loader.conf vs rc.d/dumpon

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:18:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > > > On 23.09.2015 19:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > I do not have a strong

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1475 - Fixed

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1475 - Fixed: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1475/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1475/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1475/console Change summaries:

Re: Add isboot iSCSI boot driver to FreeBSD

Hi, First of all, thank you for using isboot. The basic problem with isboot is that it only works with the old iSCSI initiator, which is now marked obsolete. AFAIK there is no ready solution It's started in FreeBSD 7.1. I plan to use initiator functions at 2010. However, I didn't know how

Re: Add isboot iSCSI boot driver to FreeBSD

Hi! Thank you for isboot! > I have removed these header files in 0.2.11 release. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203324 is the suggested update from 0.2.10 to 0.2.11, if maintainer also approves ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years