Re: Crashes in libthr?

2016-03-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2016-03-15 12:21, Larry Rosenman wrote: This may have been my screw up On March 15, 2016 12:05:03 PM Bryan Drewery wrote: On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: On

[Bug 194744] [PATCH] allow to specify custom keymap when kbdmux used

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744 o...@hardenedbsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||o...@hardenedbsd.org ---

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
[snip] It's not rsync itself. It's just triggering some odd behaviour. I've poked alc; I'll work with him to see if this can be figured out. Thanks! I'm glad I'm not the only person who has seen this behaviour! -adrian ___

[Bug 194744] [PATCH] allow to specify custom keymap when kbdmux used

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744 --- Comment #4 from o...@hardenedbsd.org --- Yes, sorry, I looked the wrong PR. This PR is a dup of 153459. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 194744] [PATCH] allow to specify custom keymap when kbdmux used

2016-03-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744 --- Comment #2 from Ed Maste --- (In reply to Oliver Pinter from comment #0) Is this patch functionally equivalent to the one in PR 153459? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:30:11 -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 07:20 -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > rsync... see bottom posting > > > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote: > > > > > On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote: >

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread olli hauer
... >> Just a point I've bought up elsewhere... >> I've, if I recall, wrecked several filesystems (although EIDE) using >> rsync at the normal bus rate, and sometimes >> thumbdrives with whatever filesystem type on them. >> >> I settled on --bwlimit=1500, max for unattended rsync usage and >>

Re: Crashes in libthr?

2016-03-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
This may have been my screw up On March 15, 2016 12:05:03 PM Bryan Drewery wrote: On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 18:47, Steven Hartland wrote: On

Re: Crashes in libthr?

2016-03-15 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> On 2016-03-14 18:47, Steven Hartland wrote: On 14/03/2016 22:28, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-03-14 17:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:33:20 -0700 Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:38:35AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > In the course of the last year or so the behavior of the vm system > > has changed in regard to how aggressively Inact memory is recycled. > > > > My

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Ian Lepore
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 07:20 -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > rsync... see bottom posting > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote: > > > On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > On 13 March 2016 at

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-15 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:53:10 +0100, José Pérez wrote: > El 2016-03-03 11:27, Matthew Seaman escribió: > > On 03/02/16 23:54, Glen Barber wrote: > >> Also note (as repeated below), running 'pkg delete -a' will implicitly > >> remove base system packages after they are installed.

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
rsync... see bottom posting On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote: > On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 13 March 2016 at 18:51, Mark Johnston wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 13,

Re: WITHOUT_CDDL prevents install of ctfconvert which breaks kernel build

2016-03-15 Thread Julian H. Stacey
I wrote: > Hi current@ people > src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL > prevents installation of ctfconvert > lack of ctfconvert broke my GENERIC kernel build Not just /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert also need /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfmerge > I could submit a send-pr (or whatever we call them on web now) >

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:41:17 +0100 Fabian Keil wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > In the course of the last year or so the behavior of the vm system > > has changed in regard to how aggressively Inact memory is recycled. > > > > My box has

Re: WITHOUT_CDDL prevents install of ctfconvert which breaks kernel build

2016-03-15 Thread Howard Su
​You need comment out the following line in GENRIC kernel conf file: makeoptions WITH_CTF=1 # Run ctfconvert(1) for DTrace support​ On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi current@ people > src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL > prevents installation

WITHOUT_CDDL prevents install of ctfconvert which breaks kernel build

2016-03-15 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi current@ people src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL prevents installation of ctfconvert lack of ctfconvert broke my GENERIC kernel build I could submit a send-pr (or whatever we call them on web now) so man src.conf warns of this, or do you have a better fix ? Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote on 03/14/2016 20:29: Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes: Bryan Drewery writes: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/master/scripts/pkg_tree.sh Can you publish it as a port? I know there is one written in Perl but I like your sh without

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-15 Thread José Pérez
El 2016-03-03 11:27, Matthew Seaman escribió: On 03/02/16 23:54, Glen Barber wrote: Also note (as repeated below), running 'pkg delete -a' will implicitly remove base system packages after they are installed. This has the potential for many feet to be shot, given that up to now, 'pkg delete

Re: how to recycle Inact memory more aggressively?

2016-03-15 Thread olli hauer
On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 13 March 2016 at 18:51, Mark Johnston wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 06:33:46PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, I can reproduce this by doing a mkimage on a