On 2016-09-15 01:10, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> I'm converting some Xen/Debian/Windows domain servers to
> FreeBSD/Bhyve/Samba domain servers. Windows is still required for a couple
> of applications, but I've recently had enough success with Samba4 to try
> this. Not the problem.
>
> The machine
I'm converting some Xen/Debian/Windows domain servers to
FreeBSD/Bhyve/Samba domain servers. Windows is still required for a couple
of applications, but I've recently had enough success with Samba4 to try
this. Not the problem.
The machines have two disks (was RAID-1 before, will be RAID-1 after)
< said:
> Well, it's definitely too late for 11, now.
> But, Debian is preparing to remove their heimdal package entirely,
> imminently: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837728
The primary issue, so far as I can see, is that Heimdal and MIT were
only compatible in the parts of t
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <
> said:
>
> > Well, it's definitely too late for 11, now.
>
> > But, Debian is preparing to remove their heimdal package entirely,
> > imminently: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837728
>
[...]
>
> Since 11.0 hasn't been released y
Begs the question-what impact to FreeBSD distribution or use will US export
control laws have, if FreeBSD migrated to MIT Kerberos?
--
*Disclaimer:*
*As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not
confidential. Any intermediary or recipient may inspect, modify (add),
cop
(was Re: OpenSSH HPN)
[See
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2015-November/008747.html
for the bits that Dag-Erling skipped]
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk writes:
> > Things seem to have slowed down a lot since the lead Heimdal developer
> >
