Re: Skylake/HD graphics support

2016-11-14 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Daniel Campos do Nascimento wrote: Hello, First time posting on a mailing list... I currently have 11.0-STABLE installed on my laptop which has a Core i7-6500U. I can't get Xorg-server to work neither with xf86-driver-intel, nor with i915kms driver; I'm falling back on the

Re: panic: mutex ncnegl not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c:743 in 12.0-CURRENT r308447

2016-11-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 13 Nov, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: >> What protects nc_flag, the lock for the list that it resides on? >> > > It is supposed to be the hot list lock and I think this uncovers a bug > here. > > Consider a NCF_HOTNEGATIVE entry which is be

Re: Lenovo X1 Carbon or T460s

2016-11-14 Thread K. Macy
On Monday, November 14, 2016, Lars Engels wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:56:45PM -0800, K. Macy wrote: > > On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Mark Heily > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Oberman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In regard to video, have you instal

Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output

2016-11-14 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 2:36 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > On 14.11.2016 16:13, Franco Fichtner wrote: >>> void ip6_flush_fwdtag(struct mbuf *m); >> >> This looks reasonable, thank you. How would we proceed with the >> implementation / porting of ipfw to the new framework? >> > > Both ipfw a

Re: Lenovo X1 Carbon or T460s

2016-11-14 Thread Lars Engels
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:56:45PM -0800, K. Macy wrote: > On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Mark Heily wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Oberman > > wrote: > > > > > > > > In regard to video, have you installed and are you using vaapi? > > > > > > > vaapi appears to be preinsta

Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output

2016-11-14 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 14.11.2016 16:13, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Andrey, > >> On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> >> I have some thought related to your proposal. >> What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags? >> With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consum

Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output

2016-11-14 Thread Franco Fichtner
Hi Andrey, > On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > I have some thought related to your proposal. > What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags? > With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consumers and handle > tags identically in all *proto*_out

Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output

2016-11-14 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 14.11.2016 15:24, Franco Fichtner wrote: > I've opened a review to start removal of if_output from the > pf code with a conservative first batch, which would eventually > enable ipfw and pf redirect packets using the same PACKET_TAG_IPFORWARD > mechanism. It was met with multiple opinions, but

netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output

2016-11-14 Thread Franco Fichtner
Hi current, There is a growing concern over usability of netpfil with several premature exits out of the framework that would seem to try to provide consistent policy enforcement on traffic, namely: if_output: called by pf route-to type tags, in 12-CURRENT also from ipfw nat64 -- if_output in the

Re: firewire panic

2016-11-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 14/11/2016 11:58, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:56:09 +0200 > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 11/11/2016 14:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> panic: mutex sbp not owned at /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:967 >>> cpuid = 2 >>> curthread: 0xf8000ada5000 >>> stack: 0xfe0504ded000 -

Re: firewire panic

2016-11-14 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:56:09 +0200 Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 11/11/2016 14:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > panic: mutex sbp not owned at /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:967 > > cpuid = 2 > > curthread: 0xf8000ada5000 > > stack: 0xfe0504ded000 - 0xfe0504df1000 > > stack pointer: 0xfe050