On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Daniel Campos do Nascimento wrote:
Hello,
First time posting on a mailing list...
I currently have 11.0-STABLE installed on my laptop which has a Core
i7-6500U. I can't get Xorg-server to work neither with xf86-driver-intel,
nor with i915kms driver; I'm falling back on the
On 13 Nov, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
>> What protects nc_flag, the lock for the list that it resides on?
>>
>
> It is supposed to be the hot list lock and I think this uncovers a bug
> here.
>
> Consider a NCF_HOTNEGATIVE entry which is be
On Monday, November 14, 2016, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:56:45PM -0800, K. Macy wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Mark Heily > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Oberman
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > In regard to video, have you instal
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 2:36 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2016 16:13, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>>> void ip6_flush_fwdtag(struct mbuf *m);
>>
>> This looks reasonable, thank you. How would we proceed with the
>> implementation / porting of ipfw to the new framework?
>>
>
> Both ipfw a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:56:45PM -0800, K. Macy wrote:
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Mark Heily wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Oberman > > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In regard to video, have you installed and are you using vaapi?
> > >
> >
> > vaapi appears to be preinsta
On 14.11.2016 16:13, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
>> On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>
>> I have some thought related to your proposal.
>> What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags?
>> With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consum
Hi Andrey,
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> I have some thought related to your proposal.
> What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags?
> With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consumers and handle
> tags identically in all *proto*_out
On 14.11.2016 15:24, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> I've opened a review to start removal of if_output from the
> pf code with a conservative first batch, which would eventually
> enable ipfw and pf redirect packets using the same PACKET_TAG_IPFORWARD
> mechanism. It was met with multiple opinions, but
Hi current,
There is a growing concern over usability of netpfil with
several premature exits out of the framework that would
seem to try to provide consistent policy enforcement on
traffic, namely:
if_output: called by pf route-to type tags, in 12-CURRENT
also from ipfw nat64 -- if_output in the
On 14/11/2016 11:58, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:56:09 +0200
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2016 14:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> panic: mutex sbp not owned at /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:967
>>> cpuid = 2
>>> curthread: 0xf8000ada5000
>>> stack: 0xfe0504ded000 -
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:56:09 +0200
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 14:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > panic: mutex sbp not owned at /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:967
> > cpuid = 2
> > curthread: 0xf8000ada5000
> > stack: 0xfe0504ded000 - 0xfe0504df1000
> > stack pointer: 0xfe050
11 matches
Mail list logo