Re: ASLR

2017-01-24 Thread Domagoj Stolfa
Hello, > For better or worse the term ASLR is today in common use to refer to a > number of different approaches. Using what has become a generic term > allows the implementation to change in the future, without changing > the interface (e.g. sysctls, userland tools, etc.). If I'm not mistaken,

Re: ASLR

2017-01-24 Thread Ed Maste
On 18 January 2017 at 17:56, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > It should also be stated properly that this patch doesn't implement ASLR, but > ASR. For better or worse the term ASLR is today in common use to refer to a number of different approaches. Using what has become a generic term

Re: vt(4) chops off the leftmost three columns

2017-01-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi! Well, give it a go. I can only be supportive. :) -a On 24 January 2017 at 10:31, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > Hi again, > > I have been switching back and forth between exploring the code and reading > J. Kong's Device Drivers book. As you explained, the first thing

RE: vt(4) chops off the leftmost three columns

2017-01-24 Thread Anindya Mukherjee
Hi again, I have been switching back and forth between exploring the code and reading J. Kong's Device Drivers book. As you explained, the first thing to tackle is the coupling between vesa and sc. Right now I can't even load vesa unless the kern.vty=sc, and then I cannot unload it. vesa

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Sean Bruno wrote: On 01/24/17 08:27, Olivier Cochard-Labb?? wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Sean Bruno > wrote: Did you increase the number of rx/tx rings to 8 and the number of descriptors to 4k in your tests

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On 01/24/17 08:27, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Sean Bruno > wrote: > > > > Did you increase the number of rx/tx rings to 8 and the number of > descriptors to 4k in your tests or just the defaults? >

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-24 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > Did you increase the number of rx/tx rings to 8 and the number of > descriptors to 4k in your tests or just the defaults? > Tuning are same as described in my previous email (rxd|txd=2048, rx|tx process_limit=-1,

Re: command line environment and port to equal CURRENT clang?

2017-01-24 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 24 Jan 2017, at 02:02, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:18:18 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 23 Jan 2017, at 05:32, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: >>> >>> ... that may work in /usr/src/sbin for example?

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On 01/23/17 23:31, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Sean Bruno > wrote: > > > > Which set of configs from your test suite are you using for this? > Specifically, what packet size are you slamming across? >