Re: firefox/ rust failed to install on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT

2017-06-05 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 03.06.2017 08:26, Tim Kientzle wrote: > You could add --format=ustar to the existing command line; that > would force bsdtar to use the older "ustar" format (without any > extensions that might confuse Python's tar file module). Even better! Thank you :) >> This will use GNU tar instead of

Re: Boot CURRENT without efi

2017-06-05 Thread Toomas Soome
> On 5. juuni 2017, at 20:31, Andy Neustadter wrote: > > Hi: > > I have an older HP desktop that does not support USB boot or UEFI. Is > it possible to use this machine with 12-current using GPT? Any help > or pointers to info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in

Re: Time to increase MAXPHYS?

2017-06-05 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
On 0604T0952, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/04/17 09:39, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > Hi > > > > One possibility would be to make it MD build-time OTIONS, > > defaulting 1M on regular systems and 128k on smaller systems. > > > > Of course I guess making it a tunable (or sysctl) would be best, >

Re: Boot CURRENT without efi

2017-06-05 Thread Allan Jude
On 2017-06-05 13:31, Andy Neustadter wrote: > Hi: > > I have an older HP desktop that does not support USB boot or UEFI. Is > it possible to use this machine with 12-current using GPT? Any help > or pointers to info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. >

Boot CURRENT without efi

2017-06-05 Thread Andy Neustadter
Hi: I have an older HP desktop that does not support USB boot or UEFI. Is it possible to use this machine with 12-current using GPT? Any help or pointers to info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Time to increase MAXPHYS?

2017-06-05 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:52:36 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/04/17 09:39, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > Hi > > > > One possibility would be to make it MD build-time OTIONS, > > defaulting 1M on regular systems and 128k on smaller systems. > > > > Of course I guess making it a tunable (or

Re: old syslog (jail) and new kernel = 100% CPU

2017-06-05 Thread Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 08:20, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > On 6/5/2017 2:34 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> >> Quoting Bryan Drewery (from Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:38:07 >> -0700): >> >>> On 6/4/17 5:09 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, new

Re: old syslog (jail) and new kernel = 100% CPU

2017-06-05 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 6/5/2017 2:34 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Bryan Drewery (from Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:38:07 > -0700): > >> On 6/4/17 5:09 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> new kernel (surely r318877 and later) and old syslog in a jail = NOK. >>> >> >> What branch and

Re: old syslog (jail) and new kernel = 100% CPU

2017-06-05 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Bryan Drewery (from Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:38:07 -0700): On 6/4/17 5:09 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, new kernel (surely r318877 and later) and old syslog in a jail = NOK. What branch and revision is the syslogd? From my understanding the bug exists in a

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

2017-06-05 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi Mark, Mandriva was a really god hint. Let's see how it goes: https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2176 --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send