Re: amd64: panic on -CURRENT @r330539 for certain UEFI hosts

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:38:56PM -0500, Peter Lei wrote: > > Some recent UEFI implementations have begun to leave the CPU with page > > write protection enabled in CR0. > > > > With r330539 which enables kernel

Re: amd64: panic on -CURRENT @r330539 for certain UEFI hosts

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:44:36PM -0700, Mark Peek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:06:23PM -0700, Mark Peek wrote: > > > I ran into the original issue with r330539 on a Fusion VM. Trying this > > >

Re: Strange ARC/Swap/CPU on yesterday's -CURRENT

On 3/20/2018 12:07 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2018-Mar-11 10:43:58 -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: >> Also, if you could try going back to r328953 or r326346 and let me know if >> the problem exists in either. That would be very helpful. If anyone is >> willing to

Re: amd64: panic on -CURRENT @r330539 for certain UEFI hosts

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:06:23PM -0700, Mark Peek wrote: > I ran into the original issue with r330539 on a Fusion VM. Trying this > patch causes a different panic: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~mp/r330539-patched.png > > Thoughts? r331290 should fixed this issue. What is your kernel

Re: Testing requested: Hybrid ISO/USB boot

Hi, i wrote: > > If byte 38977 (decimal) was 0xef rather than 0x00, then it would be marked > > as an El Torito boot image for EFI. Benno Rice wrote: > I’ve regenerated the image here: > https://people.freebsd.org/~benno/hybrid-bootonly-20180323-00.iso.xz Looks better now:

Re: Testing requested: Hybrid ISO/USB boot

changeset/base/331463 <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331463> And I’ve regenerated the image here: https://people.freebsd.org/~benno/hybrid-bootonly-20180323-00.iso.xz <https://people.freebsd.org/~benno/hybrid-bootonly-20180323-00.iso.xz> > Further: This section begins at byte addr

Re: Two NIC's inside a Jail

Hi, Sorry that I am coming to the conversation a little late. I have several systems Which run with multiple IP connections where the jail responds to multiple IPs I set /etc/rc.conf to just control the ips of the host. as an example; ifconfig_igb1="inet AAA.AAA.AAA.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"

Re: problem with [intr{swi4: clock (0)}]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 15:38 AN wrote: > Hi: > > I would appreciate any help with this issue, this is a new machine built > in the last week and if it is a hardware issue I want to return it. The > problem seems to have started in the last 24 hours or so. I am seeing a > really

Re: Two NIC's inside a Jail

Hi, thanks for yor help. I can't find a solution. But i have find a starnge ip config. in rc.conf on Host(not jail) ifconfig_vmx0_alias1="inet 192.168.100.2  netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_em0="inet 213.70.80.92 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig on host say: inet 213.70.80.92 netmask

Re: problem with [intr{swi4: clock (0)}]

On Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:36:48 AM AN wrote: > Hi: > > I would appreciate any help with this issue, this is a new machine built > in the last week and if it is a hardware issue I want to return it. The > problem seems to have started in the last 24 hours or so. I am seeing a > really

Re: two NIC's in a jail

Thanks for replay. netstat -an | egrep 'tcp4.*80 .*LISTEN' say: netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem No such file or directory <- is inside a jail. tcp4    0        0 *.80        *.*        LISTEN grep -i Listen /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf Listen 80 Listen 443 From the internal IP is no

Re: two NIC's in a jail

Thanks for replay. netstat -an | egrep 'tcp4.*80 .*LISTEN' say: netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem No such file or directory <- is inside a jail. tcp4    0        0 *.80        *.*        LISTEN grep -i Listen /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf Listen 80 Listen 443 From the internal IP is no

Re: two NIC's in a jail

tail -f /var/log/httpd-access.log 192.168.100.2 - - [23/Mar/2018:13:12:10 +] "OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0" 200 - 192.168.100.2 - - [23/Mar/2018:15:12:02 +] "OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0" 200 - 213.70.80.92 - - [23/Mar/2018:15:33:07 +] "OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0" 200 - 213.70.80.92 - - [23/Mar/2018:15:33:08

Re: two NIC's in a jail

Joerg Surmann wrote on 2018/03/23 16:45: Thanks for replay. netstat -an | egrep 'tcp4.*80 .*LISTEN' say: netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem No such file or directory <- is inside a jail. tcp4    0        0 *.80        *.*        LISTEN grep -i Listen /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf

Re: two NIC's in a jail

Thanks for replay. netstat -an | egrep 'tcp4.*80 .*LISTEN' say: netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem No such file or directory <- is inside a jail. tcp4    0        0 *.80        *.*        LISTEN grep -i Listen /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf Listen 80 Listen 443 From the internal IP is no

Re: two NIC's in a jail

Joerg Surmann wrote on 2018/03/23 13:49: Hi all, I have a Problem to understund how to manage 2 Networks inside a Jail. i have create a jail (using ezjail) with a alias IP. in rc.conf (on Host): ifconfig_vmx0="inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_vmx0_alias0="inet 192.168.100.2

two NIC's in a jail

Hi all, I have a Problem to understund how to manage 2 Networks inside a Jail. i have create a jail (using ezjail) with a alias IP. in rc.conf (on Host): ifconfig_vmx0="inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_vmx0_alias0="inet 192.168.100.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"  <- this is the jail

Re: Testing requested: Hybrid ISO/USB boot

2018-03-22 19:06 GMT+01:00 Benno Rice : > Hello all! > > I’ve been working on the ability to create hybrid ISO/HDD boot images for > x86, a la what Linux systems do with ISOHYBRID. The general theory seems to > be that ISO images have a 32KB hunk of zeroes at the front that

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

Hi! > To be clear, *I've included a link to a patch to freebsd-update > in my initial post, and the help I'm looking for: is to get this > functionality added as a feature so others can benefit.* It > works for me already, and I've already benefited. > > (I'm happy to flesh it out, and

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

On 18-03-21 05:24 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 21.03.2018 um 22:12 schrieb Derek (freebsd lists) <48225...@razorfever.net>: Hi! I was surprised when using freebsd-update, that there was no way to specify a patch level. AFAIK, the usual answer to these kinds of requests is: „Run your own

Re: Testing requested: Hybrid ISO/USB boot

Hi Benno, > On 23. Mar 2018, at 8:50 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > APU1C boot: aborts with "Invalid partition" 3x, then "No /boot/loader" > and then escapes to "FreeBSD/x86 boot" etc. Small follow-up: the hybrid-bootonly.iso goes blank on this one due to no dual boot /

Re: Testing requested: Hybrid ISO/USB boot

Hi Benno, > On 22. Mar 2018, at 7:06 PM, Benno Rice wrote: > > I’ve been working on the ability to create hybrid ISO/HDD boot images for > x86, a la what Linux systems do with ISOHYBRID. The general theory seems to > be that ISO images have a 32KB hunk of zeroes at the