Re: Strange ARC/Swap/CPU on yesterday's -CURRENT

On 2018-Mar-17, at 11:26 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 17/03/2018 18:51, Mark Millard wrote: >> I'll note that top was a -w that reports: >> >> -w Display approximate swap usage for each process. > > As far as I can tell, this option is quite broken. > The "approximate swap usage" it

Re: i386 4/4 change

On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:05:57AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > I haven't yet run any performance tests, I'll try building world and a > few large ports tomorrow. General operation from the command line does > not feel "sluggish" in any way, however. I just updated the review with some changes

Re: i386 4/4 change

On 31 Mar 2018, at 17:57, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >> the change to provide full 4G of address space for both kernel and >> user on i386 is ready to land. The motivation for the work was to both >> mitigate Meltdown on i386,

Re: i386 4/4 change

On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, Konstantin Belousov wrote: the change to provide full 4G of address space for both kernel and user on i386 is ready to land. The motivation for the work was to both mitigate Meltdown on i386, and to give more breazing space for still used 32bit architecture. The patch was

Re: 12-Current panics on boot (didn't a week ago.)

The drm-next-kmod, and drm-stable-kmod modules panic for me. I will attach logs when I can. On Friday, March 30, 2018, Andrew Reilly wrote: > Hi Jonathan, all, > > I've just compiled and booted a kernel derived from current-GENERIC > but with nooptions TCP_BLACKBOX, and

i386 4/4 change

Hi, the change to provide full 4G of address space for both kernel and user on i386 is ready to land. The motivation for the work was to both mitigate Meltdown on i386, and to give more breazing space for still used 32bit architecture. The patch was tested by Peter Holm, and I am satisfied with