Re: FreshPorts, pkg query and pkg rquery: versions of dependencies

2018-10-28 Thread Jan Beich
Graham Perrin writes: > devel/icu for example. > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 04:13, I wrote: > >> Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers > >> … >> specifies icu>=59.1,1 so I'm probably OK there … > > I say

Re: Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 04:36, Jan Beich wrote: > Graham Perrin writes: > > > - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for > > Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu? > > > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1 > > Only one icu version is supported in the ports

Re: Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Jan Beich
Graham Perrin writes: > - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for > Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu? > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1 Only one icu version is supported in the ports tree, so the above is nop. The ports are built against whatever

FreshPorts, pkg query and pkg rquery: versions of dependencies

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
devel/icu for example. On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 04:13, I wrote: > Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers > … > specifies icu>=59.1,1 so I'm probably OK there … I say "probably" because I'm not sure how to

Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
Thanks, people! devel/icu was the hint that I needed. On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 23:26, Jan Beich wrote: > … Either rebuild www/waterfox from the last revision before removal or > downgrade devel/icu to 62.1 if nothing else requires 63.1. In the former > case you can also update the port (adjust

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Kristof Provost
On 28 Oct 2018, at 14:39, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get this error message;

Re: Waterfox: shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so"

2018-10-28 Thread Jan Beich
Graham Perrin writes: > $ waterfox > XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/waterfox/libxul.so: > Shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so" > Couldn't load XPCOM. devel/icu major updates aren't ABI-compatible, so each update requires rebuilding every consumer.

Re: Waterfox: shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so"

2018-10-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:33:31PM +, Graham Perrin wrote: > $ waterfox > XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/waterfox/libxul.so: > Shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so" > Couldn't load XPCOM. > $ date ; uname -v > Sun 28 Oct 2018 22:31:00 GMT > FreeBSD

Waterfox: shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so"

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
$ waterfox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/waterfox/libxul.so: Shared object "libicui18n.so.62" not found, required by "libxul.so" Couldn't load XPCOM. $ date ; uname -v Sun 28 Oct 2018 22:31:00 GMT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r339737 GENERIC-NODEBUG $ Is there any easy-ish way to work

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Marek Zarychta
W dniu 28.10.2018 o 22:39, Rodney W. Grimes pisze: >> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: >>> Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get this

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > >> Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading > >> pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command > >> and get this error message; > >> > >> linker_load_file:

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Kristof Provost
> On 28 Oct 2018, at 12:56, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: >>> Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf >>> from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get >>> this error

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Ernie Luzar
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get this error message; linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/pf.ko-unsupported file

Re: UEFI boot hangs after loader

2018-10-28 Thread Yuri Pankov
Warner Losh wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 10:39 AM Yuri Pankov wrote: > >> Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On 18. 10. 24., Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM Harry Newton wrote: > gryphon# efivar -N --hex $(efivar | grep Boot0002) > : 01 00 00 00 98 00 55 00 45 00

Re: UEFI boot hangs after loader

2018-10-28 Thread Harry Newton
The patch you emailed fixed it for me ... was there something else I've missed ? On 28 October 2018 at 16:40, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 10:39 AM Yuri Pankov wrote: > >> Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> > On 18. 10. 24., Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM Harry

Re: UEFI boot hangs after loader

2018-10-28 Thread Warner Losh
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 10:39 AM Yuri Pankov wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On 18. 10. 24., Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM Harry Newton wrote: > >> > >>> gryphon# efivar -N --hex $(efivar | grep Boot0002) > >>> : 01 00 00 00 98 00 55 00 45 00 46 00 49 00 3a 00 > >>>

Re: UEFI boot hangs after loader

2018-10-28 Thread Yuri Pankov
Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 18. 10. 24., Warner Losh wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM Harry Newton wrote: >> >>> gryphon# efivar -N --hex $(efivar | grep Boot0002) >>> : 01 00 00 00 98 00 55 00 45 00 46 00 49 00 3a 00 >>> 0010: 20 00 4b 00 69 00 6e 00 67 00 73 00 74 00 6f 00 >>> 0020:

Re: 12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:31, Ernie Luzar wrote: Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get this error message; linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/pf.ko-unsupported file type. Looks like the 12.0

Re: "arc4random: no preloaded entropy cache" printed once per CPU on startup

2018-10-28 Thread RW
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:38:00 -0600 Rebecca Cran wrote: > On a normal boot (not verbose) of -CURRENT from today's sources I'm > getting the following message printed once for each logical CPU: > > > arc4random: no preloaded entropy cache > > > Since other messages, including the same one in

12.0-BETA1 vnet with pf firewall

2018-10-28 Thread Ernie Luzar
Tested with host running ipfilter and vnet running pf. Tried loading pf from host console or from vnet console using kldload pf.ko command and get this error message; linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/pf.ko-unsupported file type. Looks like the 12.0 version of pf which is suppose to work in vnet

12.0-BETA1 vt console with rc.conf blanktime, screensaver or loader.conf splash screen not working.

2018-10-28 Thread Ernie Luzar
blanktime, screensaver has no effect on vt console. splash screen has no effect on vt console. no messages of any kind issued. They all work on sc console. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: UFS panics

2018-10-28 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 10/27/18 5:34 PM, Leandro wrote: I just wanted to confirm if panics on UFS were expected if the file system had errors This is no official answer, but yes, basing on my nearly 20 years of experience with UFS, I've come to expect them. Several times after some boxes of mine crashed, they

Re: Facing kernel panic during early boot from 12.0 ALPHA9

2018-10-28 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Thanks Mark. On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:29 AM Mark Johnston wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 07:35:14PM +0530, Rajesh Kumar wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > Thanks for the inputs. With the two patches you pointed out, I could able > > to compile from current, install and boot properly without any