/usr/doc can not be build neither can it be installed

2018-12-18 Thread O. Hartmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello FreeBSD users out there. My last build and update of /usr/doc was end of May 2017; since then any attempt building the doc from /usr/doc failed on 12-CURRENT to 12-STABLE and now on 13-CURRENT. I believe all the required ports (following

Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD

2018-12-18 Thread Enji Cooper
Hello Matthew, I appreciate the long write up, as someone who still uses FreeBSD ZFS on my NAS box and knowing some of the history with ZFS on *Solaris, etc. Something like this was bound to happen with post the Oracle buyout. > On Dec 18, 2018, at 10:49 PM, Matthew Macy wrote: > > The

The future of ZFS in FreeBSD

2018-12-18 Thread Matthew Macy
The sources for FreeBSD's ZFS support are currently taken directly from Illumos with local ifdefs to support the peculiarities of FreeBSD where the Solaris Portability Layer (SPL) shims fall short. FreeBSD has regularly pulled changes from Illumos and tried to push back any bug fixes and new

Re: possible POLA violation for NFS server to make it Linux compatible

2018-12-18 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > The change to make the FreeBSD NFSv4 server use vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport is > trivial > and I think being compatible with Linux is important (I see it as the defacto > standard NFS implementation these days). > > What do others think I should

possible POLA violation for NFS server to make it Linux compatible

2018-12-18 Thread Rick Macklem
It was my understanding that the NFSv4 working group believed that the requirement for the NFSv4 client to use a priviledged port# (< 1024) should not exist. As such, I coded the server to ignore the vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport sysctl and allow the mount for NFSv4. PR#234106 has reported this as a