Alan Somers wrote:
>On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 7:59 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been working with Peter Errikson on a patch for mountd that adds a new
>> option
>> for incremental updating of exports. This seems to be helping a lot w.r.t.
>> performance
>> on an NFS server with
There are several port failures triggered by
LIB_DEPENDS=libomp.so:devel/openmp. It finds /usr/lib/libomp.so and
doesn't use devel/openmp, but then the build fails because it also needs
some other libraries.
Why was /usr/lib/libomp.so added to the base?
Its addition potentially creates an
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 7:59 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been working with Peter Errikson on a patch for mountd that adds a new
> option
> for incremental updating of exports. This seems to be helping a lot w.r.t.
> performance
> on an NFS server with lots (1+) of exported file
Hi,
I've been working with Peter Errikson on a patch for mountd that adds a new
option
for incremental updating of exports. This seems to be helping a lot w.r.t.
performance
on an NFS server with lots (1+) of exported file systems.
I have debug syslog() calls in the code, which I/Peter
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:57:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019, 9:48 AM Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:45:47PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:38:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:12 AM Igor Mozolevsky
wrote:
> This is a typical example of reframing a problem in one side's
> favourable terms. Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom as
> recognised by the United Nations, and is guaranteed by the highest
> courts of any civilised society.
On Sat, May 18, 2019, 9:48 AM Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:45:47PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:38:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:24:36AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:45:47PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:38:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:24:36AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Sat,
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:38:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:24:36AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:33:28AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:24:36AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:33:28AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:18:57PM -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> > > > I just updated from
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:35:06AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This was fairly late in the transition from single- to multi-user mode:
> the NICs had been probed; em0 was determined (correctly) to have no
> link, but the wireless NIC (wlan0) hadn't associated to the AP yet.
>
> I have placed
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:33:28AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:18:57PM -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> > > I just updated from r346856 to r347950 and ran into a new panic, caused
> > > by having
On 2019-05-18 02:55, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Try this instead. I will revert r347931 after this landed, or could keep
> it alone.
That works - thanks!
--
Rebecca Cran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
This was fairly late in the transition from single- to multi-user mode:
the NICs had been probed; em0 was determined (correctly) to have no
link, but the wireless NIC (wlan0) hadn't associated to the AP yet.
I have placed copies of the dump and a couple of screenshots in
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 00:10, wrote:
>
> Igor et al,
>
> Instead of debating definitions of hate speech, free speech, and trying to
> discover intent, I suggest we focus on right relationships.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A14THPoc4-4
This is a typical example of reframing a problem in
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:33:28AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:18:57PM -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> > I just updated from r346856 to r347950 and ran into a new panic, caused
> > by having if_tap_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf - because it's already
> > built-in to the
from Niclas Zeising:
So now I wonder why I failed four times straight building current. One
definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a
different result.
Maybe the build host, 11.1-STABLE from July 30, 2017, was too old? I wouldn't
have thought it was too old.
17 matches
Mail list logo
