Re: poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

2019-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 14 Sep, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Kurt Jaeger wrote this message on Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 19:38 +0200: >> - a poudriere build >> - of a list of ports >> - on 12.0-RELEASE-p10 >> - on a 4 core+4 hyperthreads CPU, an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 >> @ 3.50GHz >> - with 32 GB RAM >> - zpool

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 13 Sep, Mark Millard wrote: > Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org wrote on > Thu Sep 12 23:00:19 UTC 2019 : > > . . . >> Nevertheless, I see these errors, >> with rustc being the usual victim: >> >> Sep 11 23:21:43 zipper kernel: pid 16581 (rustc), jid 43, uid 65534, was >> killed: out of swap

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 13 Sep, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 12 Sep, Mark Johnston wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:00:17PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> My poudriere machine is running 13.0-CURRENT and gets updated to the >> >> latest version of

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com wrote on Fri Sep 13 05:53:41 UTC 2019 : > Basically, page fault handler waits for vm.pfault_oom_wait * > vm.pfault_oom_attempts for a page allocation before killing the process. > Default is 30 secs, and if you cannot get a page for 30 secs, there is >

Re: poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

2019-09-14 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Mem: 4598M Active, 2854M Inact, 11G Laundry, 6409M Wired, 6375M Free > > ARC: 3850M Total, 1721M MFU, 2090M MRU, 665K Anon, 19M Header, 19M Other > > 3406M Compressed, 3942M Uncompressed, 1.16:1 Ratio > > Swap: 18G Total, 18G Used, 396K Free, 99% Inuse, 68K In > > > > So: Swap is

Re: head -r352274 buildkernel targetting armv7 failure: am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaratio

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Sep-14, at 11:21, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 11:05 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> After updating my amd64 context to head -r352274, >> attempting an amd64->armv7 cross buildworld buildkernel >> ended up failing with: >> >> >> --- am335x_dmtpps.o --- >>

Re: poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

2019-09-14 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Kurt Jaeger wrote this message on Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 19:38 +0200: > - a poudriere build > - of a list of ports > - on 12.0-RELEASE-p10 > - on a 4 core+4 hyperthreads CPU, an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 > @ 3.50GHz > - with 32 GB RAM > - zpool with 2x 500 GB SSDs as a mirror > > and right

Re: head -r352274 buildkernel targetting armv7 failure: am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaratio

2019-09-14 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 11:05 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > After updating my amd64 context to head -r352274, > attempting an amd64->armv7 cross buildworld buildkernel > ended up failing with: > > > --- am335x_dmtpps.o --- > /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error:

head -r352274 buildkernel targetting armv7 failure: am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
After updating my amd64 context to head -r352274, attempting an amd64->armv7 cross buildworld buildkernel ended up failing with: --- am335x_dmtpps.o --- /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99

poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

2019-09-14 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! I'm running - a poudriere build - of a list of ports - on 12.0-RELEASE-p10 - on a 4 core+4 hyperthreads CPU, an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 @ 3.50GHz - with 32 GB RAM - zpool with 2x 500 GB SSDs as a mirror and right now, this can be seen: last pid: 90922; load averages: 5.02,

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:59:58PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > Fri Sep 13 16:24:57 UTC 2019 : > > > Not sure this is relevant, but in compiling chromium on a Pi3 with 6 GB > > of swap the job completed successfully some months ago, with peak swap >

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org wrote on Thu Sep 12 23:00:19 UTC 2019 : . . . > Nevertheless, I see these errors, > with rustc being the usual victim: > > Sep 11 23:21:43 zipper kernel: pid 16581 (rustc), jid 43, uid 65534, was > killed: out of swap space > Sep 12 02:48:23 zipper kernel: pid

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Fri Sep 13 16:24:57 UTC 2019 : > Not sure this is relevant, but in compiling chromium on a Pi3 with 6 GB > of swap the job completed successfully some months ago, with peak swap > use around 3.5 GB. The swap layout was sub-optimal, with a 2 GB