Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 11:17:31PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 01:34:28AM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2019, at 0:10, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > >> > > >> What if the user wants to

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 01:34:28AM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > On 29 Dec 2019, at 0:10, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > >> > >> What if the user wants to factor a hexadecimal value which does not > >> happen to include [a...f]? >

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 09:34:52PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > > On 27 Dec 2019, at 17:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch now includes a fix for hexadecimal conversion. It > > > > simple scans the string

Re: getting rid of sys/nfs/nfs_lock.c

2019-12-28 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 12/28/19 7:30 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: Hi, sys/nfs/nfs_lock.c uses Giant. Since it has not been used by default since March 2008, I suspect it can be removed from head without any impact. Post March 2008, the only way this code could be executed is by both building a kernel without "options

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Garance A Drosehn
On 29 Dec 2019, at 0:10, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: >> >> What if the user wants to factor a hexadecimal value which does not >> happen to include [a...f]? >> >> How about recognizing a prefix of '0x' as a way to indicate the value >>

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > On 27 Dec 2019, at 17:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > This patch now includes a fix for hexadecimal conversion. It > > > simple scans the string for a hex digit in [a,...,f] and assumes > > > that a hexadecimal string has

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:46:52PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > On 27 Dec 2019, at 17:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > This patch now includes a fix for hexadecimal conversion. It > > simple scans the string for a hex digit in [a,...,f] and assumes > > that a hexadecimal string has been

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Garance A Drosehn
On 27 Dec 2019, at 17:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > > This patch now includes a fix for hexadecimal conversion. It > simple scans the string for a hex digit in [a,...,f] and assumes > that a hexadecimal string has been entered. A string that includes > character from the decimal digits is assumed to

Re: getting rid of sys/nfs/nfs_lock.c

2019-12-28 Thread Rick Macklem
Oh, I forgot to mention that, post March 2008, this code was replaced by the in kernel nlm found in sys/nlm, which is why it has been in use. From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org on behalf of Rick Macklem Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2019 7:30 PM

getting rid of sys/nfs/nfs_lock.c

2019-12-28 Thread Rick Macklem
Hi, sys/nfs/nfs_lock.c uses Giant. Since it has not been used by default since March 2008, I suspect it can be removed from head without any impact. Post March 2008, the only way this code could be executed is by both building a kernel without "options NFSLOCKD" and deleting nfslockd.ko from the

Re: OpenSSL breaks factor(6)

2019-12-28 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:15:33PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 08:42:53PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:00:04PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:47:17PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This