Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>Rick Macklem wrote on 2020/03/19 03:09:
>> Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>>
>> [...]
>
>>> NFS (or any other server) should check list of revoked certificates too.
>>> Otherwise you will not be able to deny access to user which you no
>>> longer want to have an access.
>> Yes, g
Jan Bramkamp wrote:
>On 20.03.20 02:44, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why
>> not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through
>> e.g. net/wireguard or sysutils/spiped? NFS is point to point.
>> Security infrastructure that actu
On 20.03.20 20:45, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Jan Bramkamp wrote this message on Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 18:51 +0100:
On 20.03.20 02:44, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why
not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through
e.g. net/wir
[ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum
visibility. Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org
. Thank you! ]
In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in
particular keyboards, we have switched the default in x11/libxkbcomm
John-Mark Gurney wrote on 2020/03/20 20:29:
Rick Macklem wrote this message on Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 23:41 +:
[...]
Without a problem statement or what you're trying to accomplish, it's
hard to say if it is.
The problem I was/am trying to solve was a way for NFS clients without a
fixed IP
Jan Bramkamp wrote this message on Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 18:51 +0100:
> On 20.03.20 02:44, Russell L. Carter wrote:
> > Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why
> > not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through
> > e.g. net/wireguard or sysutils/spiped? NFS is
Rick Macklem wrote this message on Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 23:41 +:
> John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >Rick Macklem wrote this message on Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:15 +:
> >> I am slowly trying to understand TLS certificates and am trying to figure
> >> out how to do the following:
> >> -> For an /etc
On 20.03.20 02:44, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why
not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through
e.g. net/wireguard or sysutils/spiped? NFS is point to point.
Security infrastructure that actually works understands the sha
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 11:12 AM Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2020, at 10:55, h v wrote:
> >
> > buildworld for 12.1-RELEASE fails on recent current.. in stage 3: cross
> > tools (see below)
> >
> > Did i miss newer Options/ Parameters (i checked UPDATING without
> > relevant changes)
> >
>
On 20 Mar 2020, at 10:55, h v wrote:
>
> buildworld for 12.1-RELEASE fails on recent current.. in stage 3: cross
> tools (see below)
>
> Did i miss newer Options/ Parameters (i checked UPDATING without
> relevant changes)
>
> i'm also not attemting a cross build, simply compiling on amd64 for
Quoting Jonathan Anderson (from Fri, 20 Mar
2020 10:21:11 -0230):
Hi all,
Running this on a 12.1-STABLE system, I see a whole lot of this in
/var/log/messages:
fahclient[53019]: ^[[91m12:15:25:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get
an assignment^[[0m
Is this because there temporarily isn'
On 3/20/20 1:51 PM, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
Hi all,
Running this on a 12.1-STABLE system, I see a whole lot of this in
/var/log/messages:
fahclient[53019]: ^[[91m12:15:25:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get
an assignment^[[0m
Is this because there temporarily isn't enough work to go aroun
Hi all,
Running this on a 12.1-STABLE system, I see a whole lot of this in
/var/log/messages:
fahclient[53019]: ^[[91m12:15:25:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get
an assignment^[[0m
Is this because there temporarily isn't enough work to go around, or
because more FreeBSD support is required
Hi,
Just a note that the client can grow its logfile at the rate of ~1GB a day.
You’ll probably want to take avoiding action.
> On 19 Mar 2020, at 07:57, Alexander Leidinger via freebsd-stable
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if someone wants to donate some FreeBSD based CPU resources to the fight
> ag
Dear List,
buildworld for 12.1-RELEASE fails on recent current.. in stage 3: cross
tools (see below)
Did i miss newer Options/ Parameters (i checked UPDATING without
relevant changes)
i'm also not attemting a cross build, simply compiling on amd64 for amd64.
--- C U T ---
Quoting Matthias Apitz (from Fri, 20 Mar 2020
08:01:12 +0100):
El día jueves, marzo 19, 2020 a las 08:57:45a. m. +0100, Alexander
Leidinger escribió:
Hi,
if someone wants to donate some FreeBSD based CPU resources to the
fight against the Corona-virus, here is a quick HOWTO in terms of
i
Quoting "Kevin P. Neal" (from Thu, 19 Mar 2020
20:51:28 -0400):
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
The patch is now on Phabricator open to reviews & ready to be tested:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24127
No source is available? They must not be serious, th
El día jueves, marzo 19, 2020 a las 08:57:45a. m. +0100, Alexander Leidinger
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> if someone wants to donate some FreeBSD based CPU resources to the
> fight against the Corona-virus, here is a quick HOWTO in terms of
> installing the Folding@Home client on FreeBSD:
>
> https:
18 matches
Mail list logo
