Re: Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? (related to ATM)

2020-11-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
mj-mailingl...@gmx.de writes: > Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? The sscop tool implements the Q.2110 > transport protocol, [...] Q.2110 is ATM over ISDN B-channels, and the only use-case I have ever heard about is to run SS7 signalling over ISDN-30 connections. (The ability to do s

Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? (related to ATM)

2020-11-09 Thread mj-mailinglist
Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? The sscop tool implements the Q.2110 transport protocol, which is used in ATM-Networks. The NATM framework was removed in April 2017, but sscop depends on netgraph (libngatm.so.4), so it seems to be independent from NATM.   The manpage refers to libunimsg(3), w

Re: Link flap when adding / removing a vlan (was Re: r360902 breaks VLAN interface on if_em (82579LM))

2020-11-09 Thread mike tancsa
On 11/9/2020 7:32 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 07.11.2020 2:46, Eric Joyner wrote: > >> The other issue is that I still don't know which devices need a >> restart / which devices do not, or whether a restart is strictly >> necessary and if there is another way to do this without worrying >> abou

Re: Link flap when adding / removing a vlan (was Re: r360902 breaks VLAN interface on if_em (82579LM))

2020-11-09 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 07.11.2020 2:46, Eric Joyner wrote: The other issue is that I still don't know which devices need a restart / which devices do not, or whether a restart is strictly necessary and if there is another way to do this without worrying about restarting the device. Could this be copied from pre

Re: panic: VERIFY(ZFS_TEARDOWN_READ_HELD(zfsvfs)) failed

2020-11-09 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 07/11/2020 19:00, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > Fixed as of r367454 (also see r367453). Thank you! > On 11/6/20, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> I think I have an idea how to keep this. In the meantime you can just >> comment it out. >> >> On 11/6/20, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >>> On 11/6/20, Andriy Gapon wrot