In message
, grarpamp writes:
> >>> What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days
> >>> There's pf, ipf and ipfw.
> >>
> >>This question comes up over years.
> >>
> >>Consider starting and joining with people to create
> >>a comparison page on the FreeBSD Wiki,
> >>both a feature / capab
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:11:43PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
[...lots...]
OK thanks for that looks like I've got some reading to do
--
J.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>>> What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days
>>> There's pf, ipf and ipfw.
>>
>>This question comes up over years.
>>
>>Consider starting and joining with people to create
>>a comparison page on the FreeBSD Wiki,
>>both a feature / capability comparison table,
>>and contextual paragr
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 1:47 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:09 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>>
>> On 11/27/20 4:29 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the problem always triggered by hald? If you disable hald in rc.conf,
>>> does the system run for a longer period of
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:09 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On 11/27/20 4:29 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>> Is the problem always triggered by hald? If you disable hald in rc.conf,
>> does the system run for a longer period of time?
>
> It turns out that disabling ntpd let the system run f
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:22 PM Eirik Øverby wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:05:43 AM CEST Warner Losh wrote:
> > I too can report this for my Lenovo Yoga running code as of September 13,
> > but with manu's latest drm... It used to work fine, but my last build on
> > the system was
On 11/27/20 11:10 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
And what is the instruction at 0x81002dcf ?
I got a much clearer panic by running "sysctl sys" which shows it's more
likely a problem for the amdgpu folks and not an underlying FreeBSD problem.
#7 0x810295cd in trap (frame=0x
On 05/09/2020 18:18, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 05/09/2020 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-05 11:00, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 04/09/2020 09:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-04 01:42, Graham Perrin wrote:
This week for the first time I toyed with OpenZFS on a USB device:
a mo
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:09:24PM -0700, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> I have a Threadripper 2990WX system that I recently installed an AMD Radeon
> Pro W5700 into. It runs fine unless I load the amdgpu driver, at which point
> it panics several seconds after boot: I have enough time to login and run a
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:34:24PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
Mind to share these tips, so I can use them on my RPI4? ;-)
sure!
I'll write up a simple site later, but in summary this is what
I've done subsequent to the initial setup. E&OE, if it breaks you
get to keep both bits, no guarantee
On 11/27/20 4:29 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Is the problem always triggered by hald? If you disable hald in
rc.conf, does the system run for a longer period of time?
It turns out that disabling ntpd let the system run for a longer period
of time - until I ran "sysctl sys" at which point
Van: tech-lists
Datum: vrijdag, 27 november 2020 04:24
Aan: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: possible usb3-connected hard drive spin down causing lag
Hi,
It seems the issue wasn't with the hardware or the connection.
I use mutt and it's the program that was slowing everything down,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:17:53AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's opinion?
There's pf, ipf and ipfw.
This question comes up over years.
Consider starting and joining with people to create
a comparison page on the FreeBSD Wiki,
both
On 11/27/20 6:09 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
I have a Threadripper 2990WX system that I recently installed an AMD
Radeon Pro W5700 into. It runs fine unless I load the amdgpu driver, at
which point it panics several seconds after boot: I have enough time to
login and run a few commands, but even if
On 27 Nov 2020, at 9:29, tech-lists wrote:
What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's
opinion?
There's pf, ipf and ipfw. Which is the one being most recently
developed/updated?
I'm used to using pf, have done for over a decade. But OpenBSD's pf
has diverged a lot m
> What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's
> opinion?
> There's pf, ipf and ipfw.
This question comes up over years.
Consider starting and joining with people to create
a comparison page on the FreeBSD Wiki,
both a feature / capability comparison table,
and contextu
On 2020-11-27 00:29, tech-lists wrote:
Hi,
What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's
opinion?
I can't speak for the whole list. ;-)
But in my opinion with tables totaling over 150 million IPs. I'm casting a
vote
for pf(4). It's wildly easy on resources and as fas
Hi!
> What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's
> opinion?
At work, we use pf for complex setups, editing the rules using fwbuilder,
and ipfw for the simple setups and the quick blocks...
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
___
Hi,
What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's opinion?
There's pf, ipf and ipfw. Which is the one being most recently
developed/updated?
I'm used to using pf, have done for over a decade. But OpenBSD's pf has diverged
a lot more from when it first came across. Ther
19 matches
Mail list logo
