Re: Is there any machine RISC-V implemented ?

On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 3:43 AM KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > Hi, all > > I've found RISC-V images in snapshots/ISO-IMAGES. Is there > any machine RISC-V implemented so far ? > ___ > > Please , search the following phrase in Google : Is there any

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

> On 25 Dec 2020, at 01:02, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:34:49 +0100 > Marc Veldman wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: >> >> mmc0: detached >> panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm >> cupid=3 >> time=2 >> KDB: stack

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

> On 25 Dec 2020, at 00:04, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > Marc Veldman wrote: >> Hello, >> since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: >> mmc0: detached >> panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm >> cupid=3 >> time=2 >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> db_trace_self_wrapper() at

Is there any machine RISC-V implemented ?

Hi, all I've found RISC-V images in snapshots/ISO-IMAGES. Is there any machine RISC-V implemented so far ? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

Yuri Pankov wrote: Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:34:49 +0100 Marc Veldman wrote: Hello, since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: mmc0: detached panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm cupid=3 time=2 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:34:49 +0100 Marc Veldman wrote: Hello, since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: mmc0: detached panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm cupid=3 time=2 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

> Disclaimer: I just started to learn git, never used it before. > If I do understand it correctly, the switch from svn to git comes with a loss > of continuously increasing revision numbers. Correct? If so I wonder how > future security advisories and errata notices will be composed. Will

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:34:49 +0100 Marc Veldman wrote: > Hello, > > since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: > > mmc0: detached > panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm > cupid=3 > time=2 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at

Re: Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

Marc Veldman wrote: Hello, since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: mmc0: detached panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm cupid=3 time=2 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0x8299a9c0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x181/frame

[LAST OFFICIAL REMINDER] Call for 2020Q4 quarterly status reports

Dear FreeBSD Community, The deadline for the next FreeBSD Quarterly Status update is December, 31st 2021 for work done since the last round of Quarterly Reports: October 2020 - December 2020. I would like to remind you that reports are collected during the last month of every quarter. Status

Re: referencing one commit in another for git

Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 6:22 PM Jan Beich wrote: Warner Losh writes: On Wed, Dec 23, 2020, 3:21 PM Alan Somers wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:16 PM Rick Macklem wrote: Hi, So I just did my first git commit. Pretty scary, but it looks ok. Now, how do I

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

Michael Grimm: > If I do understand it correctly, the switch from svn to git comes with a loss > of continuously increasing revision numbers. Correct. > Correct? If so I wonder how future security advisories and errata notices > will be composed. Will there be a date of the commit besides its

Git and uname(1)

On 24/12/2020 14:15, Michael Grimm wrote: … In the past I could easily judge if there was a need to buildworld or buildkernel: If uname shows a smaller revision number than those in advisories or notices. … I see Rainer Hurling's response to John Kennedy at

Git commits/revisions: sequential numbering: git-rev-list(1) --count

On 24/12/2020 14:11, Michael Grimm wrote: … Disclaimer: I just started to learn git, never used it before. If I do understand it correctly, the switch from svn to git comes with a loss of continuously increasing revision numbers. Correct? … Yes and no.

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

> loss of continuously increasing revision numbers git rev-list --count HEAD git describe --tags / parent Plus a bunch of similar ways to do it, from different points, in different formats, search internet for them all... git revision version numbering... Some deploy structured metadata in tag

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

Correction: > On 24. Dec 2020, at 15:11, Michael Grimm wrote: > > In the past I could easily judge if there was a need to buildworld or > buildkernel: If uname shows a larger revision number than those in advisories > or notices. In the past I could easily judge if there was a need to

git and the loss of revision numbers

Hi Disclaimer: I just started to learn git, never used it before. If I do understand it correctly, the switch from svn to git comes with a loss of continuously increasing revision numbers. Correct? If so I wonder how future security advisories and errata notices will be composed. Will there be

Boot panic on Lenovo P50s since r367998

Hello, since r367998 my Lenovo P50s panics on boot: mmc0: detached panic: Bad link elm 0xf80003a73300 next->prep != elm cupid=3 time=2 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0x8299a9c0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x181/frame 0x8299aa10