Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread tech-lists
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 07:33:40PM -0700, Chris wrote: Doesn't bsdinstall allow choosing different means of fetching the dist files? iirc it gives an ftp list. I tried with ftp.uk and ftp.de.freebsd.org. Last I remember using it, I was able to choose ftp http(s), etc... Making, or using an

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [aarch64 test did not reproduce the issue]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 13:38, Mark Millard wrote: > [The first buidlworld is still in process. So while waiting . . .] > > On 2021-May-4, at 10:31, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I probably know why the huge count of differences this time >> unlike the original report . . . >> >> Previously I built

Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread Chris
On 2021-05-04 18:58, tech-lists wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:35:17PM -0400, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Where are you trying to install to? Usually the assumption is that the microsd images *are* the installed system rather than a tool you use to install a system. I'm trying to install

Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread tech-lists
Hi, On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:35:17PM -0400, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Where are you trying to install to? Usually the assumption is that the microsd images *are* the installed system rather than a tool you use to install a system. I'm trying to install -current (or stable/13 or releng/13.0)

ZFS rename with associated snapshot present: odd error message

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
I had a: # zfs list -tall NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT . . . zroot/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA72-instwrld-norm 1.44G 117G 96K /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA72-instwrld-norm zroot/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA72-instwrld-norm@dirty-style 1.44G -

Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
tech-lists tech-lists at zyxst.net wrote on Tue May 4 19:22:39 UTC 2021 : > I've been trying to set up a boot-from-usb3 raspberry pi 4. I thought > i'd be able to do this by booting into latest current snapshot image for > arm64 rpi (written to microsd), and then running bsdinstall as root. I've

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [Ignore recent test: -dirty vs. checked-in usage difference]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[The first buidlworld is still in process. So while waiting . . .] On 2021-May-4, at 10:31, Mark Millard wrote: > I probably know why the huge count of differences this time > unlike the original report . . . > > Previously I built based on a checked-in branch as part of > my experimenting.

Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
Yes, it should work just fine; however, we don't provision the microsd images for the installer, especially for -CURRENT. The actual OS is fetched in plaintext to allow caching and the MANIFEST files are what provides authentication -- they provide the checksums of the files that get fetched

should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread tech-lists
Hi, I've been trying to set up a boot-from-usb3 raspberry pi 4. I thought i'd be able to do this by booting into latest current snapshot image for arm64 rpi (written to microsd), and then running bsdinstall as root. I can select the auto-zfs option then select the usb3 disk as installation

diffoscope's odd UnicodeDecodeError error message: reason found

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
I had reported in the reproducable build list messages: > # diffoscope /.zfs/snapshot/2021-04-*-01:40:48-0/bin/sh > [...] > $<3/>2021-05-04 08:49:21 W: diffoscope.main: Fuzzy-matching is currently > disabled as the "tlsh" module is unavailable. > UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [Ignore recent test: -dirty vs. checked-in usage difference]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
I probably know why the huge count of differences this time unlike the original report . . . Previously I built based on a checked-in branch as part of my experimenting. This time it was in a -dirty form (not checked in), again as part of my experimental exploration. WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[Just adding readelf -S info since it seems to show more.] On 2021-May-4, at 10:01, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-4, at 08:51, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: But I'll note that I've

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 08:51, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> But I'll note that I've built and stalled py37-diffoscope >>> (new to me). A basic quick test showed that it reports: >>> >>> W:

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Ed Maste
On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 11:52, Mark Millard wrote: > > > As far as the utf-8 issues go, diffoscope requires a utf-8 locale and > > I suspect that is the issue. If you don't have LANG set already, try > > setting LANG=C.UTF-8 in your environment. > > That is not the issue for the UnicodeDecodeError:

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> But I'll note that I've built and stalled py37-diffoscope >> (new to me). A basic quick test showed that it reports: >> >> W: diffoscope.main: Fuzzy-matching is currently disabled as the

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: > > But I'll note that I've built and stalled py37-diffoscope > (new to me). A basic quick test showed that it reports: > > W: diffoscope.main: Fuzzy-matching is currently disabled as the "tlsh" module > is unavailable. I just looked up tlsh -

Re: Problem compiling harfbuzz

2021-05-04 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Tue, 04 May 2021 10:20:24 +0200, Filippo Moretti via freebsd-current wrote: > > Good morning,    harfbuzz did not compile with he > following error:  File > "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/mesonbuild/modules/gnome.py", line > 449, in _get_dependencies_flags >    

Problem compiling harfbuzz

2021-05-04 Thread Filippo Moretti via freebsd-current
Good morning,    harfbuzz did not compile with he following error:  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/mesonbuild/modules/gnome.py", line 449, in _get_dependencies_flags     if use_gir_args and self._gir_has_option('--extra-library'):   File

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-3, at 21:27, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-3, at 19:26, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-May-3, at 10:51, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> On 2021-May-3, at 07:47, Ed Maste wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 02:50, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: > >