Re: kldload i915kms screen goes black

On 5 Dec 2022, at 20:55, Chen, Alvin W wrote: I have a newly-built system with an ASUS Prime Z590M-Plus and Intel 10900k with onboard graphics (UHD 630, according to intel). I specifically chose a 10th gen processor because I believed it was well- supported by 13.1+. Unfortunately I can’t

RE: kldload i915kms screen goes black

> > I have a newly-built system with an ASUS Prime Z590M-Plus and Intel 10900k > with onboard graphics (UHD 630, according to intel). > > I specifically chose a 10th gen processor because I believed it was well- > supported by 13.1+. Unfortunately I can’t even install 13.1 >

kldload i915kms screen goes black

I have a newly-built system with an ASUS Prime Z590M-Plus and Intel 10900k with onboard graphics (UHD 630, according to intel). I specifically chose a 10th gen processor because I believed it was well-supported by 13.1+. Unfortunately I can’t even install 13.1

Re: Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA?

> Thank you very much, Gregory. I use it for all it's intended use cases, > but have also leveraged it to generate a list of "bad actors" that I > add to pf(4). The list is verified daily and currently contains `half > a billion IPv4 IP's. I could have never managed anything like this with > all

Re: Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA?

On 2022-12-05 10:26, Gregory Shapiro wrote: I think the problem was that the original developers of sendmail have mostly disappeared. More or less. It looked like abandonware. Oh. You mean for Political reasons. :-( Nope, still here. Granted, the release cycle has slowed, but new features

Re: Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA?

> I think the problem was that the original developers of sendmail have mostly > disappeared. > More or less. > It looked like abandonware. Nope, still here. Granted, the release cycle has slowed, but new features are being tested and coming (e.g., SMTPUTF8/EAI, MTA-STS). I'll be integrating

Re: Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA?

Am 2022-12-05 18:37, schrieb Chris: I just noticed that FreeBSD will now install dma(8) instead of sendmail(8) as the default mailer. Why is this so? Thank you --chris I think the problem was that the original developers of sendmail have mostly disappeared. More or less. It looked like

Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA?

I just noticed that FreeBSD will now install dma(8) instead of sendmail(8) as the default mailer. Why is this so? Thank you --chris 0xBDE49540.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: The dma mess

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:42:29AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > If one has not seen Mike Karel's email, here's the URL. > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main/2022-December/011300.html > > > > The

Re: The dma mess

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:42:29AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > If one has not seen Mike Karel's email, here's the URL. > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main/2022-December/011300.html > > The upshot is > > 1) No entry in src/UPDATING about dma replacing sendmail, and

The dma mess

If one has not seen Mike Karel's email, here's the URL. https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main/2022-December/011300.html The upshot is 1) No entry in src/UPDATING about dma replacing sendmail, and thereby breaking a function system on upgrade. 2) Having