Re: current status of zfs block_cloning on CURRENT?

2023-04-24 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:49 PM Charlie Li wrote: > Charlie Li wrote: > > Pete Wright wrote: > >> i've seen a few threads about the block_cloning feature causing data > >> corruption issues on CURRENT and have been keen to avoid enabling it > >> until the dust settles. i was under the

Re: current status of zfs block_cloning on CURRENT?

2023-04-24 Thread Charlie Li
Charlie Li wrote: Pete Wright wrote: i've seen a few threads about the block_cloning feature causing data corruption issues on CURRENT and have been keen to avoid enabling it until the dust settles.  i was under the impression that we either reverted or disabled block_cloning on CURRENT, but

Re: current status of zfs block_cloning on CURRENT?

2023-04-24 Thread Charlie Li
Pete Wright wrote: i've seen a few threads about the block_cloning feature causing data corruption issues on CURRENT and have been keen to avoid enabling it until the dust settles.  i was under the impression that we either reverted or disabled block_cloning on CURRENT, but when i ran "zpool

current status of zfs block_cloning on CURRENT?

2023-04-24 Thread Pete Wright
hi everyone, i've seen a few threads about the block_cloning feature causing data corruption issues on CURRENT and have been keen to avoid enabling it until the dust settles.  i was under the impression that we either reverted or disabled block_cloning on CURRENT, but when i ran "zpool

Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-24 Thread Warner Losh
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 10:22 PM Mark Millard wrote: > [Warner answered my specific question separately. This is about > something else.] > > On Apr 23, 2023, at 20:57, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:40 PM Simon J. Gerraty > wrote: > >> Mark Millard wrote: > >> > I will

Re: another crash and going forward with zfs

2023-04-24 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On 4/18/23, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On 4/18/23 05:14, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> On 4/17/23, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but from my understanding there were zero >>> problems with block cloning when it wasn't in use or now disabled. >>> >>> The reason I've

Re: dbus broken?

2023-04-24 Thread George Kontostanos
unsubscribe On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:02 AM Lizbeth Mutterhunt, Ph.D wrote: > > > > Wenn einem gar niets meer einfällt, schreit man auch nix. Mijn mute reminder! > > Begin doorgestuurd bericht: > > Van: "Lizbeth Mutterhunt, Ph.D" > Datum: 24 april 2023 om 08:58:54 CEST > Aan:

Fwd: dbus broken?

2023-04-24 Thread Lizbeth Mutterhunt, Ph.D
Wenn einem gar niets meer einfällt, schreit man auch nix. Mijn mute reminder! Begin doorgestuurd bericht: > Van: "Lizbeth Mutterhunt, Ph.D" > Datum: 24 april 2023 om 08:58:54 CEST > Aan: current-us...@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: dbus broken? > > As I tried the CURRENT Image from Aor., 4th, I

Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?

2023-04-24 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Warner Losh wrote: > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/git: Undefined symbol "__libc_start1@FBSD_1.7" > > This is a symptom of trying to run a prog built for target on a host > which is not the same. > Your path is messed up then. We always run (a copy of) the host's binaries I wasn't using the