Re: DTrace on FreeBSD

2012-04-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:18:38 +0100 Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Ryan Stone got a chance to give a brief talk at the dtrace.conf last week where he covered the status of support on FreeBSD. http://smartos.org/2012/04/09/dtrace-conf-2012-dtrace-on-freebsd/ I was wondering

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk (from Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:26:42 +): On 20 Mar 2012, at 10:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote: i386-32 and amd64-64 is weird and confusing. IMO, you should go either with x86-{32,64} names, or with i386/amd64, not with a mix. Would we ever want to support

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:59:20 +0100): On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:34:03PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk (from Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:26:42 +): On 20 Mar 2012, at 10:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:58:34 +0400): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: You can download from http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ The files are - i386_SMALL - i386_SMALL_loader.conf

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:24:01 +0400): On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:58:34 +0400): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Alexander

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-02-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting ~Lst slack...@gmail.com (from Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:38:43 +0700): 2012/2/28 Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote: W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze: You cannot ship that on by default for

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-02-23 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +): On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote: You can download from http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ The files are - i386_SMALL - i386_SMALL_loader.conf - amd64_SMALL

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-23 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Scott Long sco...@samsco.org (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:39 -0700): On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Scott Long sco...@samsco.org (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700): On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Scott Long sco...@samsco.org (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700): On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar n...@freebsd.org (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:55:40 +): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:42:52 +0100): On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled

[CFT] modular kernel config

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and 9.x) and a suitable loader.conf which: - tries to provide as much features as GENERIC (I lost one or two disk controllers, they are not available as a module... or I didn't find them) - incorporates some more

NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? - if_cxgb - if_cxgbe - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? - if_hme: is compiled as a

New kernels and tinderboxes

2012-02-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, can someone please point me to the place where I can see how files in the kernel config directories are handled in the tinderboxes? The background is, that I work on a modular kernel config which comes with an example-loader.conf (to have similar features than GENERIC). I would like

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz (from Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:05:59 +0100): I would like to share them with others, if there are interrest to include it in stock FreeBSD base. If there's no interest, or no consent to add a specific one, why not collect them in a wiki-page? Bye,

Linuxulator (was: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server)

2011-12-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, you assume in your comment that development time wasted in the linuxulator is time lost for other development. This assumption could be valid for a commercially developed OS, but is wrong for FreeBSD. I tell this as a person who spend a lot of time with the linux ports, mentored a GSoC

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I extended the gcc part a little bit to make it a little bit more clear when it matters. Bye, Alexander. -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Stefan Esser s...@freebsd.org hat geschrieben:Am 21.12.2011 22:49, schrieb Johan

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place. Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free to go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be improved. The page is far from perfect and needs some

Re: svn commit: r228576 - in head: . sys/boot/forth sys/modules sys/modules/carp sys/modules/if_carp

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
with delete-old. As such the entry does not beong ino ObsoleteFiles. Bye, Alexander. -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org hat geschrieben:  Alexander, On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 03:08:43PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger

AW:[PATCH] Default scrub interval to whole weeks

2011-10-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi,  why 5 weeks and not 4? Shouldn't we add a variable for the weekday to make it more predictable?  Bye,  Alexander.  -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Xin LI delp...@delphij.net hat geschrieben:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: Is there a step by step howto for dtrace on 9.0 ?

2011-10-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 20:05:21 +0800 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, the subject says it all - does anyone have a step by step howto for doing userland and kernel dtrace on 9.0? Are you talking about the setup of dtrace? - Wiki Are you talking about how to trace something? -

Re: issue with old linuxbase.

2011-09-13 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:00:01 +0100 Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.uk wrote: On 10/09/2011 18:06, Boris Samorodov wrote: or when'll upgraded linux base system? When somebody do the actual work. http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2011/08/29/howto-create-a-new-linux_base-port/ and

Re: [PATCH] updated /etc/rc.d/jail and added ZFS support

2011-07-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:11:37 +0200 Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote: The attached patch allows better fine-tuning of jails started via /etc/rc.d, uses the new jail(8) flags (-c -m), the persist parameter and adds ZFS support. Patch is fully backward compatible. Please review, comment

Re: MFC

2011-06-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:03:50 +0300 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: on 24/06/2011 14:44 Johan Hendriks said the following: Hello all i have a question regarding MFC At the svn page from head most revisions comments contain a line like MFC after:x weeks or x days. or x

Re: ZFS install from -CURRENT snapshot

2011-05-31 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net (from Mon, 30 May 2011 11:01:06 -0400): --As of May 29, 2011 9:10:57 AM -0400, George Kontostanos, freebsd-current@freebsd.org is alleged to have said: --As of May 29, 2011 12:06:30 PM +0300, George Kontostanos is alleged to have said: The new

Re: newnfs user setup

2011-05-27 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Michael Reifenberger m...@reifenberger.com (from Fri, 27 May 2011 10:02:09 +0200 (CEST)): - make buildworld WITH_CTF=1 make buildkernel WITH_CTF=1 Do not build world with CTF, this will produce broken static executables. Bye, Alexander. -- Freedom is nothing else but the chance

Re: Using Dtrace for Performance Evaluation

2011-05-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting David Christensen davi...@broadcom.com (from Thu, 5 May 2011 13:08:56 -0700): I was looking at using dtrace to help characterize performance for the new bxe(4) driver but I'm having problems with the very simple task of capturing time spent in a function. The D script I'm using looks

Re: deleting an old file during install

2011-04-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Hi, With the NFS client switchover, the link to mount_nfs called mount_newnfs is no longer used. Can I just make an entry in head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Yes. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting David Schultz d...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:46:45 -0400): On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote: Hi, I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. The reason is that it doesn't work and

Re: bsd/linux ioctl.

2011-04-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:28:06 -0700): [linux ioctl compatibility] So my first question is is this hack commonly known? and secondly should we clean it up and put it in an ioctl(9) man page? We should probably have such a page. Do we have a

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:51:48 +0200): On 2011-04-19 13:21, Alexander Leidinger wrote: ... You probably also want to remove the code that uses __INTEL_COMPILER in source tree if you want to be really thorough. Ok, new patch attached. Some

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org (from Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:47:00 +0200): On 2011-04-18 16:34, Alexander Kabaev wrote: ... Please review the attached patch, which cleans up the ICC bits. You probably also want to remove the code that uses __INTEL_COMPILER in source tree if you want

Re: kernel thread creation cleanup

2011-04-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com (from Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:21:43 +0300): On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade NOT looking at it.. boy we really need to go through there with a broom..

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-31 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org (from Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:50:04 -0400): Seriously, this problem is very well known. There were several work-arounds suggested but the most popular one is setting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS environment variable. Try GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS Flash on Google and you will

Re: ZFS dedup and temporary freeze

2011-03-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com (from Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:57:49 +0300): I thought that jails would be a good candidate for dedup. So far I am using it without any issues in my /usr/src and /virtualBox directories. No idea about your problem, but ezjail is already doing

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100): pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD. I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you explained. features supported are or will be : - the register

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:14:52 +0100): 2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net: Quoting Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100): pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote: What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg/package/xxx files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work (so the DB

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:47:13 -0700 Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote: What

Re: WITHOUT_JAIL and make delete-old{,-libs}

2011-03-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com (from Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:04:18 +0100): On 20/03/2011 17:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:51 +0100 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} conditional

Re: WITHOUT_JAIL and make delete-old{,-libs}

2011-03-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:51 +0100 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} conditional to remove old files on 8.2-RELEASE so I started to write it without watching if -CURRENT already make it in

Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang

2011-03-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org (from Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:33:37 +0100): Hi everyone, we have performed a benchmark of the perl binary compiled with base gcc, ports gcc and ports clang using the perlbench benchmark suite. Our benchmark was performed solely on amd64 with 10 different

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

2011-03-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de (from Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:01:30 +0100): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote: Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote: I just committed

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

2011-02-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote: Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote: I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD. I updated the system without removing the tuning for ZFSv15 first, and somehow this completely messed up the performance.

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:24:17 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:24:17 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:21:09 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun Dec 12 10, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:24:17 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:17:10 +): 17:51 @ Genesys : Luigi Rizzo had a plugabble scheduler back in 4.* or \ thereabouts 17:51 @ Genesys : you could kldload new ones and switch to them on the fly 17:52 @ arundel : wow. that sounds cool. too

Re: Event based scheduling and USB.

2010-10-27 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org (from Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:57:59 +0300): Takanori Watanabe wrote: It's time to implement powertop for freebsd, isn't it? Surely it is. I was even thinking about possibility to port one from OpenSolaris, but other work distracted me. You may take

Re: [USB] Keyboard, mouse and ergonomy

2010-09-27 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net (from Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:21:42 +0200): Hi, I was thinking about adding a sysctl to ukbd and ums that shows how many keypresses have been done and how many pixels you have moved the mouse during a day. These number will mostly be useful for making

Re: daily_scrub_zfs_enable is missing in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf

2010-09-16 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Thomas freebsdli...@bsdunix.ch (from Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:01:05 +0200): Hello Is there an actual reason why daily_scrub_zfs_enable is missing in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf? Besides the fact that the authoritative source of information is the man-page: the 800.scrub-zfs is

Re: ZFS Cache Log Device Failure Handling

2010-09-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Jason J. W. Williams jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com (from Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:30:51 -0600): How well does ZFS on FreeBSD handle a dying/wedged log and/or cache device? OpenSolaris handles this pretty well in my experience and will fail through relatively quickly. But this tends to rely on

Re: One-shot-oriented event timers management

2010-09-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org (from Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:10:00 +0300): I have actively tested this code for a few days on my amd64 Core2Duo laptop and i386 Core-i5 desktop system. With C2/C3 states enabled systems experience only about 100-150 interrupts per second, having HZ set to

Re: [CFT] Improved ZFS metaslab code (faster write speed)

2010-08-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:34:18 -0700 Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx wrote: Perhaps reduced UMA fragmentation helps those subsystem that do use UMA (including ZFS which always uses uma for various housekeeping data). PJD told me once that ZFS is always using UMA, it is just not using it for

HPC/CUDA on FreeBSD (was: Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk)

2010-08-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I'm taking out arch and some people from the CC and only keep curr...@. This is getting off topic for the initial thread. Quoting Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk (from Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:10:24 +0100): On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:35:48AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org (from Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:56:01 +0200): Em 2010.08.18. 19:37, Rui Paulo escreveu: On 18 Aug 2010, at 18:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulorpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com (from Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:56:44 +0200): Updating that port to icc 11.1 is probably not a trivial task, and making sure it compiles programs properly is even trickier... :) It is not as trivial as a normal configure;make;make install port, but with

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting V. T. Mueller, Continum v.t.muel...@continum.net (from Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:20:26 +0200): Hello, Alexander Leidinger wrote: If someone would get icc 11.x up and runnig as a port (similar to what we have for outdated icc version in the ports collection), I would have a look if my

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no (from Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:16:23 +0200): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes: If someone would get icc 11.x up and runnig as a port (similar to what we have for outdated icc version in the ports collection), I would have a look if my

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting V. T. Mueller, Continum v.t.muel...@continum.net (from Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:15:19 +0200): Alexander Leidinger wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: If someone would get icc 11.x up and runnig as a port (similar to what we have for outdated icc version in the ports collection), I would

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen marco+freebsd-curr...@lordsith.net wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the following to the -current list: Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: # zpool list pool1 NAMESIZE

Re: Running all regression tests

2010-06-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Erik Cederstrand e...@cederstrand.dk (from Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:02:51 +0200): Hi, I'd like to run the regression tests in src/tools/regression on a regular basis. What's the official way to do this? Is there some way I can run them all in one go? It seems it's necessary to enter

Re: SUJ update

2010-05-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (from Sun, 02 May 2010 07:38:57 +0200 (CEST)): When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA. I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:23:33 -0700): Your patch works for me, thanks. There is just one more problem with the CTF I found a case where it does not work (not kernel related), I have another one which works better. generation that needs to be

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:33:22 -0700): On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:23:33 -0700): Your patch works for me, thanks. There is just one more

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting jhell jh...@dataix.net (from Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:46:33 -0400): [testing CTF] This sounds like a case of too many knobs to control whether ctfconvert will be used on any resulting object code. Couldn't this be better handled by defaulting WITH_CTF:=NO instead of having it act Boolean

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-16 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:40 -0700): Have you or anyone else ever used buildkernel successfully with makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes in the conf file? Something as simple as this does not work for me: Copypaste patch, tabs probbly mangled: ---snip---

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:40 -0700): On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:31:30 -0700): On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Alexander Leidinger netch

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:33:29 -0700): I read the UPDATING entry that accompanied r206082 and added WITH_CTF=yes to my kernel config, hoping to get CTF information in the kernel and all modules. No luck. It appears that NO_CTF remains set to 1

Re: Does makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes actually work?

2010-04-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:31:30 -0700): On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Alexander Leidinger netch...@freebsd.org wrote: Quoting Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:33:29 -0700): I read the UPDATING entry that accompanied

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-09 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no (from Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:50:16 +0200): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes: I did not suggest to run the same program and get different interfaces. My suggestion was to have a backend-lib and a frontend. The backend containing

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru (from Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:51:08 +0400): On 08.04.2010 10:27, Bruce Cran wrote: That's a shame. As long as the source isn't available it's of little interest to me. For anyone who wants to see the bits of code I've got so far, I've created a

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no (from Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:05:34 +0200): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes: Please consider using SVN instead. A lot more users will be able to check out from there. We don't grant non-committers access to the Subversion repo

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no (from Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:01:33 +0200): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes: I think this is more complicated than to refactor the interesting part into a backend with an API which both tools can use. This would also allow someone

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no (from Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:15:27 +0200): Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: There have been at least three or four attempts to do this in the past. One of them was even fully funded

HEADS-UP: WITH_CTF now picked up from src.conf/make.conf/kernel-config

2010-04-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, from r206082 on: $Subject Make sure to read UPDATING (short: make sure there is no WITH_CTF in src.conf or make.conf). Bye, Alexander. -- You will save yourself a lot of needless worry if you don't burn your bridges until you come to them. http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @

Re: FYI: v4l-linuxulator support in FreeBSD-current now [panic]

2010-03-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net (from Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:14:20 +0100): On Tuesday 12 January 2010 18:49:48 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: I tried to fix something, but it was apparently not enough. I committed something similar. Bye, Alexander. -- Corrupt, adj.: In

Re: Increasing MAXPHYS

2010-03-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Scott Long sco...@samsco.org (from Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:17:33 -0600): code was actually taking advantage of the larger I/O's. The improvement really depends on the workload, of course, and I wouldn't expect it to be noticeable for most people unless they're running something like a

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-05 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:01:30 +0100 Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote: On 05.03.2010 11:48, Alex Keda wrote: On 05.03.2010 12:59, Doug Rabson wrote: On 5 Mar 2010, at 09:56, Alex Keda wrote: It seems to me, business and freedom - are mutually exclusive

Re: How to fix this in 5.1-REL??

2003-11-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:57:10 -0800 Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now we are moving on to V5 and 'world' is growing increasingly dangerous to use. Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is

Re: null_lookup() vnode locking wierdness

2003-11-24 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:53:53 +0600 Boris Popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, this seems to be correct and necessary addition. At first sight, the later code shouldn't blow because of that. BTW, buildworld -jN on top of the null mount together with another buildword -jN on the

mount problems: file name too long with a 79 character name?

2003-11-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, ---snip--- {71} FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT [M87:~netchild/FreeBSD/SystemOnCD] (62) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # realpath work/SystemOnCD-1/usr/ports/distfiles |wc -c 79 {0} FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT [M87:~netchild/FreeBSD/SystemOnCD] (63) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # realpath /space/distfiles |wc -c 17 {0}

Re: Using Geom to mirror root partitions?

2003-11-15 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:51:27 + Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been a bit out of touch with developments recently. I was wondering whether it's possible to mirror root partitions across two drives yet? I seem to remember that this was something that geom could help with,

Re: ALTQ support

2003-11-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:13:49 +0100 Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I certainly doubt that! On his homepage he has own patchsets for early 4.x releases and gives KAME as a resource for 5.x patchsets. So prove me wrong (by finally finding that mysterious thread) or stop spreading that kind

Re: boot0 and fdisk / disklabel misbehaviour

2003-11-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:36:14 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote: - boot0 off-by-one error: Now, boot0 identifies my FreeBSD partitions as BSD instead of FreeBSD. It also identifies my Debian partition (type 0x83) as BSD instead of Linux and my Debian swap

Re: New EHCI device ID

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:11:37 +0100 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:19PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: It's that easy? Just adding device ID? I was under impression that you need to write/modify a driver for a new chip. Adding the ID is just beautifying

Re: ALTQ support

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:56:19 +0800 Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know it depends on the way the core team members see it. It doesn't. If someone with enough knowledge in the relevant source tree parts is willing to import it, he is free to do it. Is there any plan to make it into the

Re: New EHCI device ID

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:19:12 +0100 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really doubt that you have a high speed mouse. EHCI only supports high speed devices itself. But it shouldn't stop the entire system if I attach an USB 1.1 mouse to an ehci controlled port. Bye, Alexander. --

Re: New EHCI device ID

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:55:39 +0100 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But ehci doesn't control low/full speed ports. The physical ports are multiplexed between ehci and ohci/uhci ports. The switching is done without driver interaction. Attached to the port is a uhub1: NEC Corporation

Re: ALTQ support

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:12:42 +0100 Tobias Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the author of altq itself or the author of the freebsd port? I don't know the who's who, but I think it was the author of altq itself. Bye, Alexander. -- Where do you think you're going today?

Re: New EHCI device ID

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:27 +0100 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: USB2 hubs are currently not supported with high speed uplinks. That's the reason why there is no EHCI support in GENERIC. EHCI needs interrupt transfers first to support usb2.0 hubs at high speed uplinks with high speed

Re: erroneous message from locked-up machine

2003-11-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:45:13 -0500 Michael W. Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nov 10 11:05:44 bewilderbeast kernel: kern.maxpipekva exceeded, please see tuning(7). Interesting. bewilderbeast~;sysctl kern.maxpipekva sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.maxpipekva' bewilderbeast~; sysctl kern.maxpipe

New EHCI device ID

2003-11-09 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I get this in the dmesg: ---snip--- ehci0: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xfc00-0xfc0003ff irq 12 at d evice 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: (New EHCI DeviceId=0x24dd8086) ---snip--- pciconv tells me: ---snip--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29:7:class=0x0c0320 card=0x24dd17f2 chip=0x24dd8086

Re: sata + vinum + Asus p4p800 = :(

2003-10-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Greg 'groggy' Lehey schrieb: Provide a dump? Analyse the problem yourself? This *is* -CURRENT, after all. I can reproduce this here (same MB). I don't think it's a vinum problem, but vinum seems to be a good way to reproduce the bug. I set up a stripe over 2 SATA disks, newfs it, run iozone

Re: panic: vm_map_wire: lookup failed

2003-10-17 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:54:43 +0200 John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The latest development source of ntpd started to use setrlimit() before using mlockall(). This combination proves fatal on -current. The code in ntpd/ntpd.c looks like this: Ok, I found an easier way to provoke the

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:49:34 +0100 Stuart Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They were, yes. But once when the sendmail daemon wasn't running. I checked the mail queue before i sent it again and it wasn't there. Perhaps sendmail stores failed mail somewhere I'm not familiar with. EUSERERROR

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates UFS2. Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about the

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:49:33 -0300 (ADT) Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now,I don't/wouldn't have softupdates enabled on / .. does the 'background fsck' know to not background if softupdates are not enabled? I'm going to switch back to -p and look a bit closer the next time it

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:27:03 +0100 Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I suspect that a marginally better place to use these would be in the make distribute target that make release uses. This way, the files are already separated out into directory structures, and it may be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >