On Nov 24, 2003, at 8:09 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss
or
: ldap.
I'll bet a larger percentage of the people are ignoring this thread
than
Gabriel,
Interesting, since no one's made any PATA drives that spin at
10,000 RPM as far as I know. For some reason I thought the
interface change allowed for this (but couldn't come up with a
good reason why it would make a difference). :)
SS Hmm, PR? pricing? I guess its easier to make people
On Sep 30, 2003, at 3:30 PM, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA
design, but just the old stuff
Hey Will and Soren! :)
On Sep 29, 2003, at 2:38 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:13:48PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
First off, there is ONLY support for Promise and HPT soft RAID
in the ATA driver, other vendors products are *not* supported (yet).
Second, there seem to be a
On Sep 29, 2003, at 4:07 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:05:11PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
I'd have to reboot and see how recent my FreeBSD stuff is... I have
been
rather distracted by the job which pays me salary :).
If you can do that, I'll check out a copy of the kernel
On Sep 19, 2003, at 5:45 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
David Leimbach wrote:
Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+
support...
I am going to try experimenting with building a ppc cross-build
environment and
try to install FreeBSD on my iPod and boot from it :)
(1) iPod's
On Sep 19, 2003, at 1:55 AM, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:22:37PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+
support...
All you need should be here: http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/hfs/
Doesn't compile under CURRENT
Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+
support...
I am going to try experimenting with building a ppc cross-build
environment and
try to install FreeBSD on my iPod and boot from it :)
Dave
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
On Sep 1, 2003, at 6:36 PM, Nicole wrote:
*SIGH*
No what I want is NO serial console. DO NOT FOR ANY REASON turn
off/not resp
ond to the keyboard port
-Dh means both keyboard and serial console... what's the problem? And
please
stop shouting.
Dave
Nicole
On 01-Sep-03 Unnamed
On Sep 1, 2003, at 2:47 PM, Scott M. Likens wrote:
I have a question related to FreeBSD Serial console,
I am aware you can use -Dh for both internal and serial, but is it
possible to see the 'kernel' boot messages sent on both the serial
and
the console?
If your BIOS supports serial port
I am rather naive on the topic but don't many drives have a single
drive jumper
which works better than a master with no slave at times?
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 5:43 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Gavin Atkinson wrote:
ata1: spurious
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 5:51AM, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Tried that too, but wasnt working either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/sapdb/src/FreeBSD/sys/src/SAPDB] # locate new|grep
include
/usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/new.h
/usr/include/c++/3.3/new
/usr/include/c++/3.3/new ought to be it.
did you try
atapci1: Intel ICH5 SATA150 controller port
0xd000-0xd00f,0xcc00-0xcc03,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007
irq 9 at device 31.2 on pci0
...
ata2: at 0xc000 on atapci1
ad4: success setting UDMA133 on Intel ICH5 chip
ad4: ST3120023AS/3.01 ATA-6 disk at ata2-master
ad4: 114473MB
On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 01:33PM, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Leimbach wrote:
This is a good policy in general, however, one could easily argue that
what is trying to be determined with signedness and such being
less-than-compared
to 0 isn't really a big deal
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 11:05PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 23:13:12 -0400
Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am guessing that the C preprocessor does not think that it is
in a system header, and thus prints out the warning.
We specifically disable automatic
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 8:13AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I think that this is a FreeBSD issue. I compiled
: the same file under Linux, with a GCC 3.3.1 checked out on 7/11
: and did not encounter this
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 1:11PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jilles Tjoelker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The compiler moans about (T)(-1) = 0 as well. Is the assumption that
: (unsigned type)(-1) is never zero valid?
yes. There are no known machines where
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 1:23PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: 134 #define __glibcpp_signed(T) ((T)(-1) 0)
: #define __glibcpp_signed(T) (!((T)(-1) 0))
Why not the simpler:
#define __glibcpp_signed(T) ((T)(-1) = 0)
that way we have an overlap on the range of the two types, so
C doesn't require two's compliment, but it encourages it.
If you take a signed value and convert it to the corresponding
unsigned type , the result must be equal modulo 2^N to the original
value (where N is the number of bits in the unsigned type. (Ignoring
any padding bits.)) (Actually it is
Heh that's because the offending macro __glibcpp_digits calls
__glibcpp_signed (T)
on an unsigned type which does a compareison.
std::numeric_limits signed long::digits on a 32bit FBSD will yield 31
because its
got 31 bits for magnitude.
Unfortunately the way it seems to go about calculating
Hi,
I think that this is a FreeBSD issue. I compiled
the same file under Linux, with a GCC 3.3.1 checked out on 7/11
and did not encounter this warning.
I think you hit it on the head.
I looked in the source code of gcc and found this:
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/c-common.c
2597 case
Yeah... and it works wonderfully
On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 11:13AM, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2003 18:01, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
(...)
I committed support for that couple of days ago:
ata-chipset.c: revision 1.32
date: 2003/07/02 10:50:44;
What is the exact problem?
I think I had an issue with one of the config utilities not running so I clobbered it
and ran the
one in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ manually and things started to work again.
Did you have a different issue?
Dave
On Thursday, July 03, 2003, at 01:26PM, Nick Wood [EMAIL
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 1:19PM, Allan Bowhill wrote:
I recently updated one of my machines to -current to adapt some code to
build under the new version of gcc (3.2.2). However, file IO using
fstream
gives error messages about implicit typenames being deprecated, and I
can't
for the life
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 1:44PM, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
file IO using fstream gives error messages about implicit typenames
being deprecated, and I can't for the life of me figure out what to do
my code to make the compiler happy
Change your /usr/include/g++/fstream as follows:
Can someone commit
I don't think you understand what I believe he was trying to say.
Commits to CVS are NOT atomic therefore getting a copy of FBSD in
between David's
start and finish of commits would be broken.
When he says he is finished.. I bet it will work again.
Now if we were all using Perforce this would
Because we aren't working on anything and need something to do... so we
find
ways to think about how we can enforce quality without understanding
how stuff
works first maybe?
:)
Just a guess.
Dave
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 02:20 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
he means that between the time
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 3:18PM, David Schultz wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, David Leimbach wrote:
Because we aren't working on anything and need something to do... so
we
find
ways to think about how we can enforce quality without understanding
how stuff
works first maybe?
Umm
much [both of you: Xu and Schultz]
Dave
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 5:54PM, David Xu wrote:
David Leimbach,
Thank you for your reply and explain the reason for me,
I normally won't reply such complain. At that time,
I was very tire and sick, after one week of hardwork and
sleep late at night
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Doug White wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading. I
was
wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for FreeBSD-5
(current).
Thanks for any input.
He didn't ask how...
I certainly have heard of no such plans. FreeBSD 5 comes with UFS2 as
the
default filesystem and you can achieve many of the benefits of a
journaling
file system by enabling soft-updates.
I believe the FreeBSD handbook has more on the topic and you can browse
it online
at
As I am slowly trying to get my feet wet with kernel programming
I was browsing through the developers handbook.
The following surprised me a bit:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/
policies-encumbered.html
So this claims that GNU licensing is *not*
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 06:15 PM, Mike Schreckengost wrote:
Hello everyone,
First off, let me express my appreciation for all of the hard work
that has been put into the 5.1-RELEASE of FreeBSD. I have installed
it, and am extremely happy with the way that it performs on my system.
Interesting. I don't believe it needs to be in the source tree.
I am not saying its bad code or isn't useful... I just don't understand
what
it has to do with FreeBSD. Does any of the other base code need this
library?
If so it would already be there wouldn't it?
Dave
On Tuesday, June 10,
I thought it was the Monica Lewinsky edition of FreeBSD.
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 07:20 PM, Mike Barcroft wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does i386-undermydesk-freebsd refer to? What is it used for?
Is there
an i386-inthedrawer-freebsd, or i386-intheXbox-freebsd?
As
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
supported
by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs
that
will include drivers not included in the default distribution? Or is
it possible
to
On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 01:23 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Q wrote:
I have been burnt by this in the past also. I think that it would be
useful if you could allow kernel modules to be bound to a particular
kernel version/date/whatever, and have external modules refuse to
load
and/or complain
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 10:40AM, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003 10:32:42 -0500
David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh... the network driver portion of the nforce drivers is *not*
GPL'd but it
has a linux only and anti-reverse engineeing clause
.
Well, network driver is a special case as it is this weird binary
'kernel' + OS shim combination which is getting popular lately. Have you
thought about getting NVidia's permission to link non-GPLed shims with
their binary object?
I have thought about it... but don't know enough to pursue it
Remember that's it's legal to to distribute seperate binaries,
as long as you comply with the GPL for the GPL'ed binary, but
it's a violation of clause 6(b) of the GPL to combine them
into one binary and distribute them, if you are legally
obligated to not give out the source code for the
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:40PM, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a
fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there.
Sounds like a kernel module
I don't know what the hell happened but it won't happen again as I am now vowing to
avoid using the Safari, .mac webmail combination.
For some reason it kept coming back with no server response and giving me no
confirmation
that the mail was ever sent via webmail... I just retried a few times
Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my
getpwnam_r assignment...
examining implementations in both Darwin and NetBSD and started trying
to implement some of
this code for FreeBSD... Its not anywhere even near the goal in sight
as I am still learning the
build
got a clear answer to that question either... basically I
haven't made much
progress due to being unclear on several of these little issues.
Dave
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:33 AM, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
of these little issues.
Dave
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:33 AM, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: Just building the lib part of world
Or even better would be just building libc. I
Thanks for all the helpful responses... :)
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 01:38PM, M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my
: getpwnam_r
programs to
send data across the firewire to one another, you could use pppd
through
that tunnel.
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:25, David Leimbach wrote:
Interesting... I didn't even know we had Ethernet over firewire :).
Mac OS X and Windows XP both have IP over firewire either working or
in the works
I can't seem to get a mirror copy of the CVSROOT directory with my
cvsup script.
This worked fine a few days ago. cvsup2.FreeBSD.org is the server I
used.
Dave
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
for backup. I
guess I can get some use out of my camera after all.
Chris
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:21, David Leimbach wrote:
Yeah... point to point connections are interesting and powerful but IP
would
be better if we could get it.
I wish I knew more about how to implement it. :)
Dave
On Wednesday
but not RELENG_4 yet.
Cheers,
-Peter
/snip
/mich
David Leimbach (leimy2k) writes:
I can't seem to get a mirror copy of the CVSROOT directory with my
cvsup script.
This worked fine a few days ago. cvsup2.FreeBSD.org is the server I
used.
Dave
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
of more than 2
nodes? Or are you thinking of using multiple firewire interfaces per
node?
-Original Message-
From: David Leimbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:32 AM
To: Christopher Fowler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP over IEEE1394?
True... I guess I
public IP.
However, The overhead could get you. I'm not sure you want to go down
the writer of creating another interface. Maybe you could use the SLIP
interface and capture that IP stuff and send across.
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:32, David Leimbach wrote:
True... I guess I didn't state my case
could use
the firewall for heartbeat.
People do clustering with fast ethernet all the time. ... I know
because we sell
a lot of it where I work :). Gigabit ethernet is better but switches
are costly.
Dave
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:32, David Leimbach wrote:
True... I guess I didn't state my
The interconnect is just 10% of the whole cluster story. Firewire
is one possibility, but Fibrechannel you could do today if you wanted
to. We have Fibrechannel support in the Qlogic isp(4) driver (thanks
Matt!) today.
Yeah... if you are lucky 10% :). In fact latency in messages isn't as
I believe i386 compatible code was disabled in the kernel because it was
hindering the performance of more advanced Intel based architectures.
Supposedly you can build it back in but that would either require
building a release
yourself or finding someone who already built the i386 version.
I have been looking into helping with the C99 conformance stuff and I wondered if the
following would be helpful?
http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/
I am sure some of you knew about this... I guess I wonder if a link on the C99 web page
is appropriate under resources and links.
Also in my
There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c
in the function
const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name).
The static variable
static time_t confmod;
is not initialized to anything.
It may have some random value the first time this function is called and
if you look at the program
Bug?
no. static variables are initialized with all-zeroes.
Groovy...
/me goes to buy electronic ANSI C standard :P
Dave
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
I am about to try to make some changes to FreeBSD current...
Should I begin to use read-only CVS instead of CVSup for this work or
is it possible to generate diffs based on CVSup'd sources?
What is the recommend method to use for playing with the source?
I already found a small change in libc
Isn't it ultimately interrupt 08 on the PC with an index in the EAX
register for the write subroutine?
I am pretty sure that's correct. I might have the interrupt value
wrong though.
Dave
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:12 PM, Auge Mike wrote:
Hi all,
I was trying to know how
Hi,
I am a software developer who has benefitted greatly from using FreeBSD the past few
years as well as other software like KDE. I have been doing what I can here and there
to make sure big projects like KDE will build and run on FreeBSD as well as other
operating systems.
I came to the
See http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/
Wes Peters has been assigned this task for a while. Perhaps you could
co-ordinate with him.
Yes and no offense to him... I am sure he is busy. Its not done yet :)
I will contact him and see if I can lend a hand in any way.
Thanks for the
Hey lets find a way to keep this goddamned thread going..
huh can we... yeah... please... I love hitting delete!!!
Keep it up and we'll be as cool as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... /sarcasm
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 07:12 PM, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Matthew Jacob wrote:
Yes, as best as I
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 07:14 PM, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Of course. And being accused of 'trolling' is also a learning
experience.
I would have to agree with your sarcasm, seems like there is a big
troll hunt and everyone is being accused.
I wouldn't call it trolling but I
Make a GRUB floppy
root (hd0,0,a) [first partition, first slice, first drive]
kernel=/boot/loader
boot
have fun :)
On Friday, Aug 30, 2002, at 11:33AM, David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
GTX Loader 1.0 BTX Version 0.00
Error: Client format not supported
Anyone have any
sstream is the correct header.
This is not a bug
On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 08:21 PM, Alexander Langer wrote:
Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What's going on wrong here?
GCC 2.9x can compile this, 3.1 cannot:
Delete and reinstall your header files. They must match
the
72 matches
Mail list logo
