Re: Linksys LNE100TX

1999-09-30 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

Hmmm...I believe mine is s LNE100TX...I know it's a Linksys, and it's a
10/100 PCI..and it's runnin fine under Current (last make world was about a
week ago), as pn0
in my config:
device pn0  # Lite-On 82c168/82c169 (``PNIC'')

and from dmesg | grep pn0 :
pn0: 82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX irq 10 at device 12.0 on pci0
pn0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:22:dd:4f
pn0: autoneg complete, link status good (full-duplex, 100Mbps)

Is it possible that the card you bought could be defective?  (have you tried
under a release or stable build?).


Douglas Kuntz
Systems Administrator
PC Tech Reports
http://www.pctechreports.com
---FreeBSD... The choice of the smart generation---

- Original Message -
From: Edwin Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 11:07 AM
Subject: Linksys LNE100TX


| Fry´s was out of Intel 100/10 ethernet cards, so I bought a Linksys
| LNE100TX remembering that I there was a driver for it.
|
| I added
| device  pn0
| to my kernel configuration and compiled the kernel.  It was not detected
| during boot.  I added the mii_bus0 controller just in case.  Recompiled
| and still not detected.
|
| Does anyone have the LNE100TX working in current?
|
| Thanks,
|
| ed
|
|
|
| To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Iomega Ditto Max Parallel

1999-10-13 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

Has anyone had any success using the parallel version of the Iomega Ditto
Max with current, or is there any support for it?

Douglas Kuntz



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Ditto Max

1999-10-14 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

Since I dont think my other mail made it through...(since I didnt see it, or
any replys)

Has anyone gotten an Iomega Ditto Max drive to work on 4.0?  I have both
types, Floppy/ditto dash card and Parallel port, and would like to use it to
back up my drive every week or so.

Thanks


Douglas Kuntz



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

oops

1999-10-14 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

ok..disregard my 2nd mail...damn @home takes forever to send out mail
*goes to a corner*



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Boot error

1999-11-26 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

Ok...for hardware, all I have in the machine is:
A Linksys 10/100 ethernet (uses pn0)
A SCSI card (uses bt0)
A S3 Virge video card
A FIC VA-503+ motherboard w/ 32meg PC66 sdram and a K6-2 400
the only thing changed between the 2 machines was the other was a Shuttle
Socket 370 motherboard, and a Celeron 366 cpu.
Everything was moved from one case/motherboard to the other
case/motherboard.
The kernel had "ata" compiled in, the options for my hardware, and the basic
floppy and video, nothing that I though was unusual.

Sorrry about the way I typed before...I actually talk like that (or worse)
half the time, and I  have to remember when to talk/type normally.

Doug

- Original Message -
From: "Mike Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Douglas Kuntz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 3:32 AM
Subject: Re: Boot error



 First things first; try using English for your problem reports.  A large
 slice of the community that might be able to answer your questions don't
 use it as their first language, and by using leet-speek you immediately
 eliminate them as a source of help.

  Before I go do a fresh SNAP install, I wanted to see if there was an
easier
  way to fix this problem...
  My -current box was a celeron...I had to switch the celeron and mboard
to my
  windoze machine to get a vidcard werkin...I recompiled the kernel to
486,
  586, and 686, and moved the HD, the cards, etc, over to the K6-2 400 I
  had...now, everytime at boot, before it even prompts for which OS to
start,
  it has a bootloader problem...if I recall it was something like:
  BTX 1.0.0  BTX Loader 1.0.1
  then "System Halted"
 
  I tried the fixit floppy, etc, and that partially worked, but locked
when it
  was mounting the filesystem.
  I'm sorry that I cant provide any more info...I only have 1 monitor and
cant
  copy/paste between 2 pcs.

 I'm sorry, but without a lot more information all I can say is "you done
 something wrong".

 You might start with an exhaustive list of the relevant hardware in the
 actual system in question, followed by the actual set of physical changes
 which took it from "working" to "not working".  We're not telepathic, and
 we don't have the time to hunt you down and steal all your hardware to
 solve your own problems, so you're going to have to help us out here.

 --
 \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\  Mike Smith
 \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself,  \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]





To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Old Libs...?

1999-12-06 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

The way I worked around the libs problem was:
instead of installing through /stand/sysinstall, I installed through
/usr/ports, as that rebuilds the binary using the libs that 4.0 comes with.
So far, everything's worked semi-perfectly (well, bash and samba work
fine..as do the rest of the ports I've installed)

Douglas Kuntz
Editor
PC Tech Reports
- Original Message -
From: "Dieter Rothacker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 6:22 AM
Subject: Old Libs...?


 Hi,

 I have just installed 4.0-SNAP-19991203. I noticed that some packages
(e.g.
 samba, bash2) complain about missing shared libs (e.g. libreadline.so.3
 needed and .4 is installed). Reading similar things in the mailing list
 archive, I assume that I have to install the old libs from a 3.3-stable
BIN.
 Correct?

 How do I find out which bin-archives I really need to download? I looked
at
 the mtree-file, but did not find the exact arc files mentioned. I do not
 want to download all bin.* files.

 Please forgive me if the solution should be obvious, it is my first try at
 FreeBSD.
 --
 Dieter Rothacker


 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Intel 810?

1999-12-06 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

As others have stated, Socket370 boards arent all 810/810c...my 4.0-Current
machine was, until last week, a Celeron 366 Socket370 on a Shuttle 440LX
board.  Though, as far as I can tell, if you're going to use a Celeron PPGA
chip, save money and go with the LX or Via chipset based boards, and use the
saved money on ram or a larger harddrive.  Celerons are all 66mhz bus
speed...though, Intel has said they plan on releasing Socket370 Pentium IIIs
in 2000.

Though, on a sidenote, I really see no reason on getting a 100mhz Socket370
board to run a Pentium III on later, when, except for the clock speed
increase, a P3 is the same as a P2 with just the addition of SIMD
extensions, which I dont think FreeBSD uses yet.

Douglas Kuntz
Editor
PC Tech Reports
http://www.pctechreports.com

- Original Message -
From: "Garrett Wollman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 2:23 PM
Subject: Intel 810?


 I recently got a quote from a hardware vendor which made the following
 claim:

  All Socket 370PGA Motherboards use either the 810 or [the] 810c chip
  set which does not support FreeBSD because 16MB of the motherboard
  memory is used for the display controller.  There is no way to tell
  the FreeBSD kernel not to use this memory so it will corrupt data.

 I find this statement rather dubious.  Can anyone out there say with
 more certainty?

 -GAWollman



 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Intel 810?

1999-12-06 Thread Douglas Kuntz 


By 66mhz, thats what Intel rates them at...I'm runnin my 366 at 75mhz
(412.5mhz)...but they're only designed for 66mhz.  Plus, you cant OC the
Socket370 chips the same as with the older 300/300a and most of the Slot1
chips.  The Socket370 CPUs dont have clock multiplier options, only bus
speed options.

But as for Micro-ATX, Shuttle makes several Socket370 440BX boards in
Micro-ATX, and FIC sells a LX based Micro-ATX board (never used a FIC board
w/ a Pentium, however, only AMD).  But, I'm willing to guess most board
manufacturers sell MicroATX boards for the Socket370...and if not, and you
really like the board, and it's a P2/P3 board, you can always get a
Socket370 to Slot1 converter card ("slocket")

Douglas Kuntz
Editor
PC Tech Reports
http://www.pctechreports.com

- Original Message -
From: "Sean Jensen-Grey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Douglas Kuntz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Garrett Wollman" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: Intel 810?


 whoa. Celerons are whatever bus speed you set them to (not 66). I see no
reason
 to buy a PIII when I can very reliably over clock a celeron processor. I
have 5
 Celeron SMP machines all running FreeBSD. They are celeron 300a OCd to 450
 running on the Abit BP6 MB. Never a problem. I even have a pair of 366 Mhz
chips
 overclocked to 550. My 4.0 Current machine is a dual celeron 450.

 please reference

 http://www.sharkyextreme.com

 http://www.arstechnica.com

 for info on overclocking. Abit boards are the defacto standard for over
 clocking.

 Sean.

 On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Douglas Kuntz wrote:

  As others have stated, Socket370 boards arent all 810/810c...my
4.0-Current
  machine was, until last week, a Celeron 366 Socket370 on a Shuttle 440LX
  board.  Though, as far as I can tell, if you're going to use a Celeron
PPGA
  chip, save money and go with the LX or Via chipset based boards, and use
the
  saved money on ram or a larger harddrive.  Celerons are all 66mhz bus
  speed...though, Intel has said they plan on releasing Socket370 Pentium
IIIs
  in 2000.
 
  Though, on a sidenote, I really see no reason on getting a 100mhz
Socket370
  board to run a Pentium III on later, when, except for the clock speed
  increase, a P3 is the same as a P2 with just the addition of SIMD
  extensions, which I dont think FreeBSD uses yet.
 
  Douglas Kuntz
  Editor
  PC Tech Reports
  http://www.pctechreports.com
 
  - Original Message -
  From: "Garrett Wollman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 2:23 PM
  Subject: Intel 810?
 
 
   I recently got a quote from a hardware vendor which made the following
   claim:
  
All Socket 370PGA Motherboards use either the 810 or [the] 810c chip
set which does not support FreeBSD because 16MB of the motherboard
memory is used for the display controller.  There is no way to tell
the FreeBSD kernel not to use this memory so it will corrupt data.
  
   I find this statement rather dubious.  Can anyone out there say with
   more certainty?
  
   -GAWollman
  
  
  
   To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
 
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
 





To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

mcrypt

2000-01-23 Thread Douglas Kuntz 

While trying to compile the Apache13-php3 port, with mod_ssl, and
encryption, I get the following error:

-c functions/mcrypt.c -o functions/mcrypt.o
functions/mcrypt.c:172: #error Please update your mcrypt library
*** Error code 1

Is this a ports problem, or a current problem?

Thanks in advance.

Douglas Kuntz



- Original Message -
From: "John Polstra" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2000 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: rtld-elf, java + tya


  ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55

 If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try
 the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let me
 know if it solves the problem.

 Thanks,
 John

 Index: lockdflt.c
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.3
 diff -u -r1.3 lockdflt.c
 --- lockdflt.c 2000/01/09 21:13:48 1.3
 +++ lockdflt.c 2000/01/23 19:03:26
 @@ -28,10 +28,9 @@
  /*
   * Default thread locking implementation for the dynamic linker.  It
   * is used until the client registers a different implementation with
 - * dllockinit().  The default implementation does mutual exclusion
 - * by blocking the SIGVTALRM, SIGPROF, and SIGALRM signals.  This is
 - * based on the observation that most userland thread packages use one
 - * of these signals to support preemption.
 + * dllockinit().  The default implementation does mutual exclusion by
 + * blocking almost all signals.  This is based on the observation that
 + * most userland thread packages use signals to support preemption.
   */

  #include dlfcn.h
 @@ -63,10 +62,13 @@

  l = NEW(LockDflt);
  l-depth = 0;
 -sigemptyset(l-lock_mask);
 -sigaddset(l-lock_mask, SIGVTALRM);
 -sigaddset(l-lock_mask, SIGPROF);
 -sigaddset(l-lock_mask, SIGALRM);
 +sigfillset(l-lock_mask);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGTRAP);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGABRT);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGBUS);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGSEGV);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGKILL);
 +sigdelset(l-lock_mask, SIGSTOP);
  return l;
  }



 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message