Geeze! Not only aren't there any emails, but I've started a full blown thread!
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:39 AM -0800 Joel M. Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
am eager
Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
am eager to figure out what's going on and recover the data.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Check your RAM.http://www.memtest86.com/
Check your BIOS settings. Try running the system with the
failsafe settings if your BIOS has that.
If all else fails put the debug options into the kernel,
add a serial console, and see if you can break into ddb.
--On Tuesday, February 04, 2003
--On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:15 PM +0100 Wilko Bulte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:12:30AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, wade wrote:
Although GENERIC functions perfectly, when I enable SMP in
GENERIC, the box freezes during big build jobs ( i.e.
I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
can't run ACPI.
What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
I realize that we can use acpidump to get the asl, correct it,
and then recompile
I've been trying to do a 'make release' the last couple of weeks and
keep getting the following error.
Is this something on my end? I assume other aren't having problems
with it being this close to release date.
Any suggestions on the fix?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:12 AM -0800 Joel M. Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to do a 'make release' the last couple of weeks and
keep getting the following error.
geeze time for a coffee. sorry people. here is the error.
=== chinese/mozilla-tclp
=== Creating
--On Friday, January 10, 2003 5:36 PM -0800 Gary W. Swearingen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got an old P100 I'm preparing for NAT duty at a Linux meeting and I
tried to install 5.0-RC2 on it. Near end of mfsroot.flp loading I
get:
zf_read: unexpected EOF
but it continues booting. Just
I came home last night and found the system Hard Locked.
^
Stopped at siointr1+0xf4: movl$0,brk_state1.0
db
db show locks
db ps
pid proc addruid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesgwchan
cmd
71987 c3557000 d364b000 1006 71985 71985 0004000 norm[LOCK Giant
c03d01a0]
.) Does anything look out of place in the trace or ps?
2.) What additional commands should I do next time this happens?
This is on a SMP kernel less than a couple of days old.
The dmesg of the system is attached.
--On Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:07 PM -0800 Joel M. Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I haven't had any Hard Locks since I upgraded the BIOS on my
BP6 from LP to RU and cvsup/buildworld/installworld again.
At the moment I'm thinking that my system is stable again, but
won't feel comfortable with that until I do some more stress
testing. I've gotten a panic, but I think its
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb
mutex. Any chance this can be reproduced while running WITNESS? If
so, you should get a panic
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:27 PM -0500 John Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20-Nov-2002 Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. Another thread has decided
yes, LONG before I posted the first time. I've even swaped
the memory from another system. The problem ISN'T the memory.
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:47 PM -0800 Nate Lawson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person before. Tried
memtest86.com yet?
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:12 PM -0800 Steve Kargl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:59:32PM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:47 PM -0800 Nate Lawson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person
running dnet on a SMP kernel causes the kernel to panic.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc2c803e8 process lock (process lock) @
../../../kern/kern_fork.c:571
2nd 0xc03cfce0 proctree (proctree) @ ../../../kern/kern_fork.c:596
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) process lock @
--On Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:36 AM +0100 Thierry Herbelot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Sunday 17 November 2002 10:50, Joel M. Baldwin a écrit :
running dnet on a SMP kernel causes the kernel to panic.
[Hijacking another thread ?]
No problem, lets compare notes.
I haven't been able
Well I'm not getting Hard Locks when I try running dnet on a
SMP kernel. Instead I've gotten the following panics.
It turns out I can run a single non threaded dnet process when
I invoke it thus: 'dnet -cpunum 0'
-
lock order
If there's a race why hasn't it been fixed in the main tree?
A swap issue makes sense. If I've been down long enough I get
swamped with email when I come back up. A bug in the latest
procmail yields 130M processes that fill up swap and make
the system be swap bound. The solution is the
Since going from a SMP to nonSMP kernel the Hard Locks don't
seem to be happening. However I'm getting panics.
I've gotten 4 'sleeping thread owns a mutex' panics and one each
of 'Assertion i != 0 failed at ../../../kern/subr_witness.c:669'
and 'Duplicate free of item 0xc3895cc0 from zone
FreeBSD outel.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Nov 7
05:13:19 PST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/disk2/usr.src/sys/i386/compile/testGeneric.nonsmp
i386
acquiring duplicate lock of same type: inp
1st inp @ ../../../netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290
2nd inp @ ../../../netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290
this
I'm still pursuing the cause of the Hard Locks on my system.
1.) I have a serial console hooked up. Nothing appears on
the console when a Hard Lock happens. No panic.
2.) Shorting IOCHK to ground on the ISA connector doesn't work
on a ABIT BP6, so I can't force myself into ddb.
The BIG
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 6:07 PM -0500 Ray Kohler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 7 18:00:10 2002
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:47:03 -0800
From: Joel M. Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dnet causes Hard Lock on SMP kernel? ( was 'Why is my
--On Friday, November 08, 2002 8:45 AM +0900 Jun Kuriyama
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:55:56 + (UTC),
Joel M. Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still pursuing the cause of the Hard Locks on my system.
1.) I have a serial console hooked up. Nothing appears
No change, the system is still Hard Locking. It did it
4 times yesterday. The next steps for me are:
1.) Get a serial console working. Maybe I'll get some
indication of what's happening that way.
2.) When the serial console is working, see if I can
break into ddb after a Hard Lock.
Is
--On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:23 PM -0600 Sean Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. . . snip . . .
I just came across this problem for the first time on my -CURRENT
from Wed Oct 30. I was in the middle of reading a message in mutt (my
MUA) on the console and the system just froze. I was
--On Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:55 AM -0500 Andrew Gallatin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joel M. Baldwin writes:
...
don't think this is related to the X FP problem ( although I am
running X11 ). There have been many times when I'd walk in the
...
options DDB
There isn't any indication of a panic. The system just
locks up and is non responsive.
--On Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:25 PM -0800 Steve Kargl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds good, but isn't it. X doesn't have control of the
graphics and kbd on my system. Only xdm and clients are
Shouldn't ALL of the files in /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/include, /usr/lib
etc be replaced during an installworld?
I've always looked for files older than the last installworld and
moved them aside thinking that they're obsolete.
( aside, not delete, just in case )
--On Monday, October 07, 2002
Seaman, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 06:04:36PM -0700, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
Something has messed up natd. If I don't have the
punch_fw option in the /etc/natd.conf file it eventuially
core dumps with a bus error. I think this started JUST
BEFORE the KSE commit.
Yes, I've seen
Something has messed up natd. If I don't have the
punch_fw option in the /etc/natd.conf file it eventuially
core dumps with a bus error. I think this started JUST
BEFORE the KSE commit.
/etc/natd.conf: ( note that this works. comment out the
punch_fw option and it
I've been trying to do a 'make release' for a week or two and I keep
getting the following error. I've cvsuped, make buildworld, make
installworld, reboot, a number times hoping for it to work, but no go.
Am I doing something wrong, or is there something that is yet to be
fixed?
su-2.05#
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/uhci.c is messed up again for those
of us that have the kernel compiled with UHCI_DEBUG. The
following patch appears to get it to at least compile.
problem summary:
1.) uhci_dump_ii is defined twice,
starting at lines 805 and 920.
2.) a missing ; at the
My current /usr/src is 524M. That include 83M of kernel
object files in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile from a couple
of different kernel builds. /usr/obj which holds the
object files from a buildworld is 460M. If you're going
to do a full cvs repository then /home/ncvs on my system
is 1391M.
The convert script seems to have an error.
su-2.05# perl -w /usr/src/etc/pam.d/convert.pl /etc/pam.conf
/(\$FreeBSD: src/: unmatched () in regexp at
/usr/src/etc/pam.d/convert.pl line 63.
su-2.05#
--On Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:09 PM +0100 Dag-Erling Smorgrav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having to apply the following patch to get a kernel
compile to go through. The problem sees to be that when
you have
options UHCI_DEBUG
AND
options DIAGNOSTIC
some conditional code gets added that trys to call uhci_dump_ii
which isn't defined anywhere. Also on
So I'm not the only one having problems. . .
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.0
([EMAIL PROTECTED], Fri Nov 9 01:58:33 PST 2001)
name not found
Assert failed: (false), function ficlCompileSoftcore, file softcore.c,
line 291
I got the system running by:
booting up with a set of
okI give up!
I've been getting this error for ages when doing a
'make depend' on the current tree and up to now
I've just done a 'make -k' to get it to work.
Whats the final solution so I don't have to do this?
What stupid thing have I missed somewhere along the line.
===
38 matches
Mail list logo
