On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 05:14:41PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote:
Yes. In the following commit, ...
Great, I'll update the kernels.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:15:26PM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote:
just asking :)
See the website.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I got this on an alpha machine overnight. Is this fixed already?
Kris
System call recvfrom returning with the following locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex Giant r = 0 (0xfc69ac88) locked @
/a/asami/portbuild/alpha/src-client/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:944
panic: witness_warn
Stack
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:47:02PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc3d25134 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:902
2nd 0xc04aa500 Giant (Giant) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/fs/specfs
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: lock order reversal
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: 1st 0xcf3fa334 filedesc structure (filedesc structure)
@ kern/sys_generic.c:895
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: 2nd 0xc070a8e0 Giant (Giant) @
fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:372
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: Stack
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
5BOn Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
Howdy,
Running 5.0.
cvsup to 5.1 and retry. The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:21:49PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
Howdy,
Running 5.0.
cvsup to 5.1 and retry. The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system.
Kris
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
mp's but not sure which version would be
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
Howdy,
Running 5.0.
cvsup to 5.1 and retry. The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:11:12PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: lock order reversal
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: 1st 0xcf3fa334 filedesc structure (filedesc
structure) @ kern/sys_generic.c:895
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:28:54PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
I's been a few days, the kernel on my machine is failing to build in the
same point...I tried cvsupping at various times.
The system is a -current from 19 July.
Build your kernel with WERROR= as discussed on this list.
Kris
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:11:12PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: lock order reversal
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: 1st 0xcf3fa334 filedesc structure (filedesc
structure) @ kern/sys_generic.c:895
Aug 9 11:29:50 dosirak kernel: 2nd 0xc070a8e0 Giant (Giant
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:11:35PM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
42 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
and I am having problems with make lint as well as with building a new kernel.
I have just updated /usr/src/sys with cvsup using tag=RELENG_5_1. Make
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:13:57PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Hello!
I have Chaintech Apogee 7VGL motherboard with on-board CMedia 8738 audio chip.
Kernel identifies it as follows:
pcm0: CMedia CMI8738 port 0xe400-0xe4ff irq 10 at device 19.0 on pci0
I am running very recent
I don't think I've seen this i386 traceback before. Is it harmless as
well?
Kris
lock order reversal
1st 0xc4797e74 vm object (vm object) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:286
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:08:06PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't think I've seen this i386 traceback before. Is it harmless as
well?
Yes. In general, any LOR involving a system map mutex and a vm object
mutex that has a stack trace looking like
Booting a new kernel I get:
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0
io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Booting a new kernel I get:
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
io0 (APIC): apic id: 2
I'm getting the following when I try and netboot the alpha package
machines (note also the missing space in the diagnostic message):
malloc() of 4096 with the following non-sleepablelocks held:
exclusive sleep mutex ifnet r = 0 (0xfc6dca90) locked @
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:28:49AM +0930, Tim Aslat wrote:
Hi All,
I don't know if I'm the only one with this problem, but here goes.
I use Nano (/usr/ports/editors/nano) as my primary text editor, however
Iv'e noticed that any time I use -CURRENT (on my notebook) it core dumps
when
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:04:11PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:48:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell
over shortly after taking load, with the following:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:29:22AM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote:
Could you please do an objdump -d on sys_pipe.o (or similar) to verify
that pipe_read+0x290 is the second call to uiomove() in pipe_read()?
Confirmed:
/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:572
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote:
db trace
g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at g_dev_strategy+0x29
launch_requests(c299bf00,0,1,,47) at launch_requests+0x448
vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) at vinumstart+0x2b2
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:00:44AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
The crashdump might actually be useful here. You'd have only the
trap() and vm_fault() frames, but at least you'd have information
about the state of the vm system.
Two crashdumps coming up! I'll move them onto
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:59:06AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Kris Kennaway writes:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:00:44AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
The crashdump might actually be useful here. You'd have only the
trap() and vm_fault() frames, but at least you'd have
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:05AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote:
ports/news/newscache now gives me a sig11. It didn't a few weeks ago
but I really can't pin it down any closer than that. I thought it may
have been related to the new gcc import but I'm not able to check
that. After it gave me the
I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell
over shortly after taking load, with the following:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000
Stack backtrace:
db_print_backtrace() at db_print_backtrace+0x18
backtrace() at backtrace+0x2c
panic() at
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:48:59AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell
over shortly after taking load, with the following:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000
Stack backtrace:
db_print_backtrace
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:48:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell
over shortly after taking load, with the following:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000
Two more panics on alpha:
panic
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Hi,
Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday.
On a system from 22.July it compiled fine.
Any ideas ?
Do you have stale C++ headers in /usr/include?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Hi,
Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday.
On a system from 22.July it compiled fine.
Any ideas ?
Do you have stale
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:15:09PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote:
I believe that the attached commit addresses the panic: sleeping thread
owns a mutex problem reported by Kris and another related problem
reported a few days earlier. The earlier problem report included the
following stack trace:
One of the alpha package machines just died with the following:
panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex
panic() at panic+0x160
propagate_priority() at propagate_priority+0x148
_mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x264
_mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0x84
_vm_map_lock() at _vm_map_lock+0x40
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:09:55AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
I've bumped into some similar problems -- it's a property of how we
current lock select(). We hold the file
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 02:53:12PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:09:55AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
I've bumped into some similar problems
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc6c1c334 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:902
2nd 0xc04aa120 Giant (Giant) @
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:33:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc6c1c334 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:902
2nd 0xc04aa120
Have you not been reading the mailing list? Right now you are
supposed to WERROR if you run into these.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
Hi all
I have made a liveCD of FreeBSD Current and it boot's and looks like it
run ok..
The only problem i am haveing is with the md system.. it dus not let me do
the newfs on the md dev, i have runing devfs and
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:32:34PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
DISABLE_PSE and DISABLE_PG_G fixes all of the machines that I've seen with
random segvs (And for the record, they've all been Pentium 4s).
Not for me. I mostly get NFS corruption though.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:06:24PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Out of curiosity I was wondering what the SMPng status was?
I have heard it's not fully implemented due to KSE/libthr not fully
implemented.
I was wondering if this was incorrect information or what?
That's not really
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:48:39PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Trying out ULE scheduling on an SMP machine causes background processes
to be stuck in locks.
One or two processes will always get stuck in *Giant (and takes up like
60% of lock) and if these are killed, then other processes are
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:30:14PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
What about stuff that breaks because
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:41:31PM +0200, Branko F. Gra?nar wrote:
oday my 5.1-RELEASE (i386) died by panic.
panic message was:
See the chapter on kernel debugging in the developer's handbook for
information on how to obtain a debugging traceback, which is pretty
much required in order for
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:28:05PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote:
The XKeysymDB file was missing! (And as I found out later, the XErrorDB
file, as well).
The open-motif port used to spam this file with its own version, which
would then be removed when the port was deinstalled. I think this is
now
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:09:05PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 17:07, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
s/gcc-3.3/ports/ issues and we are in agreement.
Patches to fix broken ports are welcome. Kris is doing a fine job
generating a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:39AM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
Add Cc: to -current list.
This seems to be varargs.h problem. It seems that all C source
which use varargs.h and va_dcl become error on GCC 3.3.1 system.
This is a known problem. Can you develop a fix?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:59:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:39AM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
Add Cc: to -current list.
This seems to be varargs.h problem. It seems that all C source
which use varargs.h and va_dcl become error on GCC 3.3.1 system
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
I forgot to remind committers that if you commit a patch that was not
submitted by the port's maintainer
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
These are the ports that have become broken on the latest build
(everything after July 14):
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-failure.html
Here is the full
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:29:12PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
No, everything seems real - at least Matt replies to e-mails
sent to him on this topic. There is also a live nntp server
up and running @ dragonflybsd.org, I saw Matt and Terry Lambert
discussing kernel things this morning there. I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Most of the new compile failures are caused by 3 or 4 types of failure
mode (all of which have to do with stricter standards compliance in
the new compiler suite). I haven't yet looked at how to fix most of
them: if you figure
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:37:17PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:02:20 -0700
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I missed the patch in your email. I'm not certain about your
approach...can someone who understands the issues comment on it?
Kris
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
Coincidence?
Some
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
Coincidence?
Some
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:05:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure this is the same bug I was seeing, because mine went
away when I turned off malloc debugging.
Without malloc debugging the chance that the allocated memory has
zeroes is large(r). Going past the
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output) the
processes that are
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:08:24AM +0200, Ian Freislich wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:16:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
using more than 100% CPU
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:35:18PM +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote:
On Tue, 2003/07/15 at 12:04:56 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It needs to be analyzed because cross-builds should
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:11:03PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:09:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build -
the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except
powerpc
I am getting dozens of these on my desktop machine since upgrading.
Can someone please add some proper debugging information to this
codepath so I can help to track them down?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:23:05AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
I've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled
here's whyI've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled
here's why :
Update and try again. Please monitor this list and the cvs commit
logs if you plan to track
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:40:21PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
I tried to file a bug for one of my -CURRENT machines using send-pr and
got the following result back:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 450
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:45:07PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:08:57 +0400
Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :)
What for? Bumped __FreeBSD_cc_version is enough.
The ports system use
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:10:14PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
Is it safe to set CPUTYPE to p4 for those with p4 processors now that
gcc has been upgraded to 3.3 in -CURRENT?
Compile some of the code that was known to be bad (see the archives
for extensive discussion) and tell us :)
Kris
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:10:25PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
The patches for GCC 3.3 were circulating for a quite some time now and
Kris did a package building pass on a package cluster with them
recently. The run finished with 703 ports broken. I am not sure how many
were broken before,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +0400, Andrew Kolchoogin wrote:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325
This is known to be harmless.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 10:48:30PM +, Tinderbox wrote:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
*** Error code 139
Does anyone know why all the tinderboxes are segfaulting? Does the
machine have hardware problems, or did someone introduce a malloc bug
into -current?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:34:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0xdf119fec
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc030b254
stack
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:46:16AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
Does anyone know why sysinstall complains,
Warning: Can't find the `5.1-CURRENT' distribution on this FTP
server. You may need to visit a different server for the release
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:18:37PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
i run a small program that writes to file, these are the numbers
Fbsdlocal disk nfs
--
4.8 44.86 42.54
5.1 34.37 16.42
are
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:29:47AM +0200, Christophe Zwecker wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if we can hope to get a current courier-mta in ports, or whats
the status on that.
Ask the maintainer..this is off-topic for the freebsd-current mailing
list.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Eivind Hestnes wrote:
Hi,
Is XFS ported to FreeBSD? If not, what's the status?
FAQ; consult the archives for extensive discussion.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Anyone's ears burning? :)
Kris
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #22: Wed Jul 2
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:59:03AM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting this LOR for some time now:
Alan says this one is harmless.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:49:01AM +0200, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
Hello:
I usuallly play chess on FICS. They use a programme
called Timeseal, which is pre-compiled for a lot
of different platforms (Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, etc).
This program adjust clocks when network
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
my previous kernel is about May 10, and the fxp works fine for me
but I cvsuped and make world/kernel yesterday (6/26), and then terrible thing
happens... the connection becomes v...e...r...y... s...l...o...w...
my ping time to
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I have not been able to buildworld.
It always cramps on:
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f
pend -a-I/usr/src5/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5/../../../../contrib/o
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Martin Dvorak wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one having this problem while building world:
I think so. Are you sure you have completely up-to-date sources and
no extra cruft in your source and object trees?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
CURRENT dated June 19;
lock order reversal
1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328
Debugger(c03f450d,c082f110,c043190e,c043190e,c043178f)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:39:22AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
Kris Kennaway writes:
I installed freebsd-games, and it has most of the games I remember, but n=
ot
rogue.
Well, hrumph, it's supposed to be in that port. Mark, it looks like
rogue wasn't added for some reason.
Oops
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:19:13PM +0100, Simon Watson wrote:
Are there any plans for including reiserFS support in FreeBSD? I plan to move my
desktop over to FreeBSD 5 at some point, but I can't seem to find any mention of
reiser for it.
This is a FAQ..consult the archives for extensive
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:39:21PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Great work by the KSE team! Looks like we might get libpthreads as
default on 5.2.
It still needs to be ported to sparc64.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:51:28PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:39:21PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Great work by the KSE team! Looks like we might get libpthreads as
default on 5.2.
It still needs
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:12:48PM +0300, Lefteris Chatzibarbas wrote:
Hello,
I believe that the web page related to DRI on BSD (FreeBSD and NetBSD)
is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/index.html
I have mailed both this mailing list and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (contact address
as
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all getting the following under
load:
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel: nfs_getpages: error 13
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 82331 (cp)
Any ideas?
Kris
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:04:20PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all getting the following under
load:
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:14:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:04:20PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:59:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tips anyone?
(squid24 port compiles without any problem)
Perhaps you have an unclean system, i.e. old files lying around. The
squid port builds successfully on a clean system (bento).
You could just use the package if you
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:16PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
What happened to /usr/games/rogue in 5.1-RELEASE? It's not in
/usr/ports/games either.
Install the freebsd-games port. This is documented in the release
notes.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:31:39PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:17:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:16PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
What happened to /usr/games/rogue in 5.1-RELEASE? It's not in
/usr/ports/games either.
Install
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Hi,
make world fails, rm -rf /usr/obj ; make -DNOCLEAN world is fine.
Always update with 'cvs update -PdA'
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 01:37:03AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Matthias Andree schrieb:
Hi,
as a band-aid fix, because 5.1-CURRENT's ppp or netgraph or whatever is
spoiled and PPPoE no longer works
Isn't this supposed to be fixed by the backouts of the c-standard
related changes
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:36:23AM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I just noticed that my ipfw rules were not loaded the last time I
rebooted. My rc.conf is included below - has something changed
recently so that these settings
There's a bogus implementation of gethostbyaddr_r() in
lib/libc/net/gethostnamadr.c that was committed 6 years and nine
months ago:
/*
* Temporary function (not thread safe)
*/
int gethostbyaddr_r(const char *addr, int len, int type,
struct hostent *result, struct hostent_data *buffer)
I just noticed that my ipfw rules were not loaded the last time I
rebooted. My rc.conf is included below - has something changed
recently so that these settings are not enough? I didn't see anything
relevant in UPDATING. My /etc/firewall.conf exists and is readable
(and unchanged since 2002).
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Nielsen wrote:
[escalated from -questions]
Hi folks-
I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX.
That works? 386 is not a supported CPU on 5.X. It is missing atomic
operations that is
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:08:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:32:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
alloca() is not being inlined when -std is specified. It is possible
there's a bug in the libc implementation. I'm also suspicious that
some of the ppp data
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:18:12AM +0200, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Can you try backing out bsd.sys.mk to r1.26 and rebuild your world and
kernel? Later
201 - 300 of 1469 matches
Mail list logo
