On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 08:36:38AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few days ago I lost some files in /usr/src/gnu and erased /usr/src/gnu/*
cvsuped to recover the files and now my build world stops in
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 strfile
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:18:43AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
One of the amd64 machines died with the following. The kernel is a
few weeks old, so this might already be fixed.
Kris
malloc() of 64 with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex mntvnode r = 0
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:26:14PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
Thanks, I will give it a try, but probably not until Monday when I
get back to work. Since you said you made this a while ago and it is
untested, does that mean that you once used PBS and are using something
else in its stead. I
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:12:09AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is it supported to be running under a 4-STABLE world and build
a 5-CURRENT world?
Yes.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:10:21PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
As far as I can see, this is a client-side problem of CURRENT's
ftp(1). FreeBSD ftp(1) was completely replaced with lukemftp,
ftp client from NetBSD, in CURRENT a year ago. The commit message
was promising:
...Lukemftp
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:04:34PM +, Sujan Gautam wrote:
Hi
I cvsupped to the -current tree for FreeBSD 5.1.
I am trying to 'make buildworld' but I keep getting these errors.
#make -j4 buildworld
-j4 obscures the error..try again without it. However, as you'd know
by reading this
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
The compiler in 4.7 does not like this:
-std=gnu99
As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails
rather early.
Committers are not required to support
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:07:24AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
I carefully worded the reply to specifically address build 5-CURRENT on
4.7. Can you try src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk rev 1.29 to see if it fixes
your problem?
Have you tested it thoroughly? Didn't you back out -std=c99 in a
previous
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:21:21AM +0200, Dennis Kristensen wrote:
Hi!
I just got the below LOR on:
FreeBSD lap.snicki.dk 5.1-BETA FreeBSD 5.1-BETA #49: Tue May 27 22:28:31 CEST
2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAP i386
sources from about half an hour before the kernel
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:15:20AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of simple text lines, pkg_info is returning what looks like
escaped words after clean install of 5.1-BETA2:
Already fixed, thanks.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
bento was running 5.1-BETA from May 5, and it crashed overnight with:
panic: pmap_release: pmap resident count 1 != 0
cpuid = 1; lapic.id =
Dumping 1024 MB
16 32[CTRL-C to abort] [CTRL-C to abort] 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224
240 256 272 288 304 320 336 352 368 384 400
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 07:03:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I still have:
M ~/tmp [16096] su - toor
[1]+ Stopped su - toor
M ~/tmp [16097] fg
su - toor
-su-2.05b#
M ~/tmp [16081] su - root
phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following:
Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already in queue' at line 321 in file
/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 2)
Any ideas?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:40:40PM +0800, leafy wrote:
I got this strange message and a core dump after installing
5.1-RC1 cdrom iso
checking if c++ supports bool types... yes
checking if conversion of longlong to float works... Segmentation fault
(core du
mped)
no
configure: error:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:15:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following:
Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already in queue' at line 321 in file
/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 2)
Any ideas?
Kris
One
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:05:58PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed this (and I think it never happened to me before):
torment:~! ftp x.y.z.w
Connected to x.y.z.w.
220 h4w h4w h4w
Name (x.y.z.w:fred): anonymous
530 Sorry, no ANONYMOUS access allowed.
ftp:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:46:36PM +0200, Morten Rodal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:21:45PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
Can you rebuild ftpd with ggdb in CFLAGS and repeat the traceback?
The ftpd? I don't have access to it, sorry. If you meant the ftp
client, here's the output
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:56:08AM +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote:
On Wed, 2003/06/04 at 00:30:36 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:15:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following:
Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:44:35AM -0700, Perry S. Glenn wrote:
Is chkrootkit giving accurate info for FreeBSD-5 ?
This is a FAQ. Please go and bother the authors of chkrootkit and
have them update the signatures so this question stops getting asked.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:44:38AM +0800, leafy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Post the code it's trying to run. It's possible it's buggy.
Kris
#include stdio.h
typedef long long longlong;
main()
{
longlong ll=1;
float f;
FILE *file
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:50:03AM +0200, P. U. Kruppa wrote:
Hi,
after a cvsup to 5.1-CURRENT my ppp over ethernet doesn't connect
anymore.
Using ppp manually I receive:
Unexpected node type socket (wanted ether)
The connection works fine on my 4.8 with identical ppp.conf .
A couple of ports are creating broken bzip2 archives since I updated
the build environments to 5.1-CURRENT:
ports-i386%bzip2 -t ja-makejvf-fkr-1.0_1.tbz
bzip2: ja-makejvf-fkr-1.0_1.tbz: file ends unexpectedly
You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt to recover
data from undamaged
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:55:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:28:02PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:10:21PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
I must admit that I overlooked this feature in lukemftp. In fact,
lukemftp can download multiple files
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:42:08PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon Jun 09, 2003 at 11:09PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
On Mon Jun 09, 2003 at 11:06PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:42:11PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
since a few days I getting
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:57:19PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
-From /etc/make.conf --
# BDECFLAGS are a set of gcc warning settings that Bruce Evans has
# suggested
# for use in developing FreeBSD and testing changes. They can be used
# by
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:38:58AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
A couple of ports are creating broken bzip2 archives since I updated
the build environments to 5.1-CURRENT:
ports-i386%bzip2 -t ja-makejvf-fkr-1.0_1.tbz
bzip2: ja-makejvf-fkr-1.0_1.tbz: file ends unexpectedly
You can use
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:34:39PM -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote:
I'm having trouble with the latest build of -CURRENT as well. Same problem,
slightly different symptoms:
Portions of my config file:
disable ipv6
deny pap
set device PPPoE:xl0
...produce this in the log (repeatedly):
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Can you try backing out bsd.sys.mk to r1.26 and rebuild your world and
kernel? Later versions of this file are causing strange problems with package
builds.
I was a little lazy and just backed out bsd.sys.mk to 1.26 as you
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:18:12AM +0200, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Can you try backing out bsd.sys.mk to r1.26 and rebuild your world and
kernel? Later
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:18:12AM +0200, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Can you try backing out bsd.sys.mk to r1.26 and rebuild your world and
kernel? Later
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:05:57PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It looks like gcc's inline alloca implementation allocates chunks in
larger chunks than the alloca.S implementation does. This (untested)
patch should make the alloca.S behaviour match that of gcc.
I suspect that there's a buffer
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:18:12AM +0200, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:50:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Can you try backing out bsd.sys.mk to r1.26 and rebuild your world and
kernel? Later
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:38:36AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Okay, it looks like alloca.S was broken. My previous patch that
increased the size of allocations was just a gratuitous difference
with the inline version, and is not necessary. Here's a fix that
seems to get ppp to stop
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:44:51AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
+ leal24(%esp), %eax /* base of newly allocated space */
After I figured out what the 24(...) meant (add 24 to ...) it's
clear that this isn't a fix (except in the special case of PPPoE
support ;-). gcc's builtin inline
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:43:42PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:37:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:38:58AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
A couple of ports are creating broken bzip2 archives since I updated
the build environments to 5.1
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Nielsen wrote:
[escalated from -questions]
Hi folks-
I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX.
That works? 386 is not a supported CPU on 5.X. It is missing atomic
operations that is
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:08:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:32:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
alloca() is not being inlined when -std is specified. It is possible
there's a bug in the libc implementation. I'm also suspicious that
some of the ppp data
I just noticed that my ipfw rules were not loaded the last time I
rebooted. My rc.conf is included below - has something changed
recently so that these settings are not enough? I didn't see anything
relevant in UPDATING. My /etc/firewall.conf exists and is readable
(and unchanged since 2002).
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 01:37:03AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Matthias Andree schrieb:
Hi,
as a band-aid fix, because 5.1-CURRENT's ppp or netgraph or whatever is
spoiled and PPPoE no longer works
Isn't this supposed to be fixed by the backouts of the c-standard
related changes
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:36:23AM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I just noticed that my ipfw rules were not loaded the last time I
rebooted. My rc.conf is included below - has something changed
recently so that these settings
There's a bogus implementation of gethostbyaddr_r() in
lib/libc/net/gethostnamadr.c that was committed 6 years and nine
months ago:
/*
* Temporary function (not thread safe)
*/
int gethostbyaddr_r(const char *addr, int len, int type,
struct hostent *result, struct hostent_data *buffer)
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Hi,
make world fails, rm -rf /usr/obj ; make -DNOCLEAN world is fine.
Always update with 'cvs update -PdA'
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:16PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
What happened to /usr/games/rogue in 5.1-RELEASE? It's not in
/usr/ports/games either.
Install the freebsd-games port. This is documented in the release
notes.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:31:39PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:17:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:16PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
What happened to /usr/games/rogue in 5.1-RELEASE? It's not in
/usr/ports/games either.
Install
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:59:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tips anyone?
(squid24 port compiles without any problem)
Perhaps you have an unclean system, i.e. old files lying around. The
squid port builds successfully on a clean system (bento).
You could just use the package if you
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:12:48PM +0300, Lefteris Chatzibarbas wrote:
Hello,
I believe that the web page related to DRI on BSD (FreeBSD and NetBSD)
is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/index.html
I have mailed both this mailing list and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (contact address
as
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all getting the following under
load:
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel: nfs_getpages: error 13
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 82331 (cp)
Any ideas?
Kris
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:04:20PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all getting the following under
load:
Jun 20 21:24:35 dalki kernel
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:14:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:04:20PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have 3 machines running off of a 5.1-CURRENT NFS server (updated on
June 19), and the 5.1-BETA clients are all
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:19:13PM +0100, Simon Watson wrote:
Are there any plans for including reiserFS support in FreeBSD? I plan to move my
desktop over to FreeBSD 5 at some point, but I can't seem to find any mention of
reiser for it.
This is a FAQ..consult the archives for extensive
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:39:21PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Great work by the KSE team! Looks like we might get libpthreads as
default on 5.2.
It still needs to be ported to sparc64.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:51:28PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:39:21PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Great work by the KSE team! Looks like we might get libpthreads as
default on 5.2.
It still needs
CURRENT dated June 19;
lock order reversal
1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328
Debugger(c03f450d,c082f110,c043190e,c043190e,c043178f)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:39:22AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
Kris Kennaway writes:
I installed freebsd-games, and it has most of the games I remember, but n=
ot
rogue.
Well, hrumph, it's supposed to be in that port. Mark, it looks like
rogue wasn't added for some reason.
Oops
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I have not been able to buildworld.
It always cramps on:
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f
pend -a-I/usr/src5/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5/../../../../contrib/o
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Martin Dvorak wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one having this problem while building world:
I think so. Are you sure you have completely up-to-date sources and
no extra cruft in your source and object trees?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
my previous kernel is about May 10, and the fxp works fine for me
but I cvsuped and make world/kernel yesterday (6/26), and then terrible thing
happens... the connection becomes v...e...r...y... s...l...o...w...
my ping time to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:49:01AM +0200, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
Hello:
I usuallly play chess on FICS. They use a programme
called Timeseal, which is pre-compiled for a lot
of different platforms (Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, etc).
This program adjust clocks when network
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:59:03AM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting this LOR for some time now:
Alan says this one is harmless.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:29:47AM +0200, Christophe Zwecker wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if we can hope to get a current courier-mta in ports, or whats
the status on that.
Ask the maintainer..this is off-topic for the freebsd-current mailing
list.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Eivind Hestnes wrote:
Hi,
Is XFS ported to FreeBSD? If not, what's the status?
FAQ; consult the archives for extensive discussion.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Anyone's ears burning? :)
Kris
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #22: Wed Jul 2
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:46:16AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
Does anyone know why sysinstall complains,
Warning: Can't find the `5.1-CURRENT' distribution on this FTP
server. You may need to visit a different server for the release
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:18:37PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
i run a small program that writes to file, these are the numbers
Fbsdlocal disk nfs
--
4.8 44.86 42.54
5.1 34.37 16.42
are
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:34:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0xdf119fec
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc030b254
stack
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 10:48:30PM +, Tinderbox wrote:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
*** Error code 139
Does anyone know why all the tinderboxes are segfaulting? Does the
machine have hardware problems, or did someone introduce a malloc bug
into -current?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +0400, Andrew Kolchoogin wrote:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325
This is known to be harmless.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:10:25PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
The patches for GCC 3.3 were circulating for a quite some time now and
Kris did a package building pass on a package cluster with them
recently. The run finished with 703 ports broken. I am not sure how many
were broken before,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:10:14PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
Is it safe to set CPUTYPE to p4 for those with p4 processors now that
gcc has been upgraded to 3.3 in -CURRENT?
Compile some of the code that was known to be bad (see the archives
for extensive discussion) and tell us :)
Kris
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:45:07PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:08:57 +0400
Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :)
What for? Bumped __FreeBSD_cc_version is enough.
The ports system use
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:40:21PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
I tried to file a bug for one of my -CURRENT machines using send-pr and
got the following result back:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 450
I am getting dozens of these on my desktop machine since upgrading.
Can someone please add some proper debugging information to this
codepath so I can help to track them down?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:23:05AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
I've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled
here's whyI've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled
here's why :
Update and try again. Please monitor this list and the cvs commit
logs if you plan to track
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output) the
processes that are
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:08:24AM +0200, Ian Freislich wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:16:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine
(kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU%
adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly
using more than 100% CPU
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:35:18PM +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote:
On Tue, 2003/07/15 at 12:04:56 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It needs to be analyzed because cross-builds should
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:11:03PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:09:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build -
the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except
powerpc
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
Coincidence?
Some
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
Coincidence?
Some
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:05:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure this is the same bug I was seeing, because mine went
away when I turned off malloc debugging.
Without malloc debugging the chance that the allocated memory has
zeroes is large(r). Going past the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:09:05PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 17:07, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
s/gcc-3.3/ports/ issues and we are in agreement.
Patches to fix broken ports are welcome. Kris is doing a fine job
generating a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:39AM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
Add Cc: to -current list.
This seems to be varargs.h problem. It seems that all C source
which use varargs.h and va_dcl become error on GCC 3.3.1 system.
This is a known problem. Can you develop a fix?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:59:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:39AM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
Add Cc: to -current list.
This seems to be varargs.h problem. It seems that all C source
which use varargs.h and va_dcl become error on GCC 3.3.1 system
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
I forgot to remind committers that if you commit a patch that was not
submitted by the port's maintainer
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
These are the ports that have become broken on the latest build
(everything after July 14):
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-failure.html
Here is the full
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:29:12PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
No, everything seems real - at least Matt replies to e-mails
sent to him on this topic. There is also a live nntp server
up and running @ dragonflybsd.org, I saw Matt and Terry Lambert
discussing kernel things this morning there. I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Most of the new compile failures are caused by 3 or 4 types of failure
mode (all of which have to do with stricter standards compliance in
the new compiler suite). I haven't yet looked at how to fix most of
them: if you figure
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:37:17PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:02:20 -0700
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I missed the patch in your email. I'm not certain about your
approach...can someone who understands the issues comment on it?
Kris
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:28:05PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote:
The XKeysymDB file was missing! (And as I found out later, the XErrorDB
file, as well).
The open-motif port used to spam this file with its own version, which
would then be removed when the port was deinstalled. I think this is
now
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:30:14PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
What about stuff that breaks because
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:41:31PM +0200, Branko F. Gra?nar wrote:
oday my 5.1-RELEASE (i386) died by panic.
panic message was:
See the chapter on kernel debugging in the developer's handbook for
information on how to obtain a debugging traceback, which is pretty
much required in order for
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:48:39PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
Trying out ULE scheduling on an SMP machine causes background processes
to be stuck in locks.
One or two processes will always get stuck in *Giant (and takes up like
60% of lock) and if these are killed, then other processes are
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:32:34PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
DISABLE_PSE and DISABLE_PG_G fixes all of the machines that I've seen with
random segvs (And for the record, they've all been Pentium 4s).
Not for me. I mostly get NFS corruption though.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:06:24PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Out of curiosity I was wondering what the SMPng status was?
I have heard it's not fully implemented due to KSE/libthr not fully
implemented.
I was wondering if this was incorrect information or what?
That's not really
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
Hi all
I have made a liveCD of FreeBSD Current and it boot's and looks like it
run ok..
The only problem i am haveing is with the md system.. it dus not let me do
the newfs on the md dev, i have runing devfs and
Have you not been reading the mailing list? Right now you are
supposed to WERROR if you run into these.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc6c1c334 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:902
2nd 0xc04aa120 Giant (Giant) @
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:33:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc6c1c334 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:902
2nd 0xc04aa120
One of the alpha package machines just died with the following:
panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex
panic() at panic+0x160
propagate_priority() at propagate_priority+0x148
_mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x264
_mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0x84
_vm_map_lock() at _vm_map_lock+0x40
501 - 600 of 1469 matches
Mail list logo
