Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-12-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:01:23 -0500 (EST) Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will

Re: device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 attach returned 6

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:55:39 -0700 peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I saw this post on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-May/002982.html on Mon May 12 22:36:58 PDT 2003. I am having problems with my nic card. I also got the device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 attach

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700 Cliff L. Biffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast. Is that just a -CURRENT thing, I can't see anything like that in -STABLE's LINT. --

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test program

Re: 3Com 3c905C-TX

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Murphy
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:08:02 +0300 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0x3000-0x307f mem 0xfa001000-0xfa00107f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2 at 100baseTX full-duplex is slower than 10Mgb :-( I recently had a similar problem. My switch