Re: SSE

2002-10-05 Thread Peter Wemm
initialized incorrectly. The last few commits to machdep.c bother me, rev 1.539 in particular. If you are in a position to be able to quickly test it, it would be great to know if backing out the last few changes fixes this, and which change in particular. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SSE

2002-10-05 Thread Peter Wemm
:-). I suspect it might be time to give up and do the alternative sigtrap and sigreturn. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

2002-10-04 Thread Peter Wemm
about trying to run vinum on partition schemes that do not even *have* disklabels. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

2002-10-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: Emiel Kollof wrote: * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c: [ ... ] This crud has *got* to be taken out and shot, then reworked to do it properly. Amen

Re: [ GEOM tests ] disklabel warnings and vinum drives lost

2002-10-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 4 October 2002 at 16:03:24 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Terry Lambert wrote: Emiel Kollof wrote: * Peter Wemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: vinum is so much unbelievable stuff in it. Consider this stuff: sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c

Re: Longer term fix for sigreturn ABI breaking

2002-09-30 Thread Peter Wemm
add a new sigreturn syscall each time we significantly break the sigreturn ABI (as in this case) and applications will be able to use the correct one. Paired with a new sigaction syscall which would specify the new context format we can then be future proof. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL

Re: World broken at libkvm

2002-09-30 Thread Peter Wemm
significant regressions to be fixed. The last thing we need during the 'please stabilize 5.0' drive is newly added problems. If other folks are seeing new ones, please report them here (not to me, I already get too much email :-]). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-26 Thread Peter Wemm
is telling you the wrong line. The problem is here: int nsegments; vs: /*nsegments*/BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED, note that: bus.h:#define BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED(~0UL) 0x will not fit in an int. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: X server crashes?

2002-09-25 Thread Peter Wemm
that clears libc_r. This machine has not had an X server crash in over 6 months - until that one. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
, this is going to suck. There are thousands and thousands of third party scripts that use +n syntax. I am most unhappy with this change. :-( Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
Garrett Wollman wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:30:11 -0700, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Oh man, this is going to suck. There are thousands and thousands of third party scripts that use +n syntax. I am most unhappy with this change. :-( The time to complain about it was back

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 13:30:11 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Oh man, this is going to suck. There are thousands and thousands of third party scripts that use +n syntax. I am most unhappy with this change. :-( It will be possible to have both variants, but +N

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
; +} Try something like this: #include stdlib.h #include unistd.h int posix2_version(void) { if (getenv(POSIX_ME_HARDER) || getenv(POSIXLY_CORRECT)) return _POSIX2_VERSION; else return 0; } Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
of another change that broke even our own world builds. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-24 Thread Peter Wemm
Garrett Wollman wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:26:43 -0700, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Closed payware standards do not count as 'fair warning'. I still have never been able to see a posix standard. Go to a library. Or go to http://www.opengroup.org/ and register for free

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-18 Thread Peter Wemm
once we get to the actual compile. The next run should be interesting. :-] Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: Crashdumps available for download ... please help

2002-09-17 Thread Peter Wemm
://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/crashes/vmcore.3.txt Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

HEADS UP: a.out support in base tree moving to ports

2002-09-16 Thread Peter Wemm
weeks. Note: kernel support for executing a.out binaries remains in the base system. Be sure to either specify 'options COMPAT_AOUT', or do a 'kldload aout' to load it at runtime if you forgot to include it. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All

Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out binary users!

2002-09-07 Thread Peter Wemm
Manfred Antar wrote: At 12:23 AM 9/7/2002 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: You will need to either add: options COMPAT_AOUT to your kernel config when you next rebuild, or do a 'kldload aout' when you want to run an old a.out binary. Is this going to be turned

HEADS UP: i386 a.out binary users!

2002-09-06 Thread Peter Wemm
You will need to either add: options COMPAT_AOUT to your kernel config when you next rebuild, or do a 'kldload aout' when you want to run an old a.out binary. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

Re: HEADS UP: SSE instructions (Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk)

2002-09-06 Thread Peter Wemm
doesn't support it. As far as I understood it, the 'dont mix 3dnow and SSE' thing was exactly that.. do not mix the instructions together in the same application stream.. Apparently the instruction decoder wasn't tuned for both in the same data stream. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL

Re: aout support broken in gcc3

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
completely removed.. there are always other ways to do that (e.g. boot 2.2.6 in a vmware machine or run them in a chroot) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe

Re: cvsup10 broken (was: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2.1-pre imported)

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../cc_int/libcc_int.a(i386 .o): In function `ix86_expand_int_movcc': i386.o(.text+0x7bf5): undefined reference to `gen_int_mode' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1. *** Error code 1 Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
(0x120108000) 36947 foo RET break 0 36947 foo CALL break(0x12010c000) 36947 foo RET break 0 How strange.. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send

Re: alpha tinderbox failure - kernel is broken.

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
-1 src/sys/compat/svr4/svr4_resource.c 1.121 +33 -10src/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c Probably the later one, the timing is about right. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5

Re: alpha tinderbox failure - kernel is broken.

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
Bernd Walter wrote: On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:01:07AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:56:52 +0200 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think this is the same reason? Yes. Folks, it is a *kernel* problem

Re: alpha tinderbox failure - kernel is broken.

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
functionality with munmap(2). We shouldn't go too far out of our way to prevent this on one subsystem when it is wide open elsewhere. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe

Re: alpha tinderbox failure - kernel is broken.

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Wemm
don't think we can do this (the last section), it is quite legal to have more than one non-text PT_LOAD segment. if the last one was very small, we'd end up with an artificially low 'data_size' which would make for interesting RLIMIT_DATA enforcement. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Wemm
be patient. Please respond immediately if you feel that I need to hold the import for some reason. Cool! Thank you for doing hard work, Alexander. BTW, does it mean that we just got a fresh new gcc maintainer? I just hope we didn't scare him too much :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm

Re: aout support broken in gcc3

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Wemm
, but that is no big deal. gcc has grown a native -funderscores option to help with the source C vs asm symbol compatability problems. But quite frankly, I'd rather have a binutils-aout and gcc-aout port if we really have to have a.out support still. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: aout support broken in gcc3

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Wemm
changes. Oh indeed, it is far from simple. But as a bonus our compiler configuration for i386 would be a lot closer to what the FSF compiler config looks like. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Wemm
trying to build itself? Buildworld completes fine on panther, the only FreeBSD sparc64 machine I have access to. This has got to be a local problem, perhaps where src/contrib/sparc/sparc.c is out of sync on the builder machine. This builds fine on panther.freebsd.org. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Peter Wemm
with a known broken prerelease compiler? Would you rather that we changed from 3.1-prerelease to 3.1.1-release? gcc-3.2 *is* 'gcc-3.1.1 + ABI bugfix'. They renamed the 3.1 branch to 3.2. All future 3.1.x releases will be called 3.2.x. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Peter Wemm
want it very badly too. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Peter Wemm
with better and chalk it up as a learning experience. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: USB slowdown on recent -current

2002-08-28 Thread Peter Wemm
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: ACPI errors

2002-08-04 Thread Peter Wemm
+ KERNBASE); + return (void *)(pa + offset + KERNBASE); I've committed this as 1.356. If it doesn't solve it, then go ahead and back out both 1.352 and 1.356. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

Re: cvs commit: src/release/i386 drivers.conf

2002-07-27 Thread Peter Wemm
on RELENG_4, but the support all got MFC'ed. Several release candidates used cdboot for better testing exposure. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: src/release/i386 drivers.conf

2002-07-27 Thread Peter Wemm
? A vm86disk driver would solve a number of problems. If you do one that is respectable, I'll commit it for you myself. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send

Re: make buildworld fails at gperf

2002-07-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Move your old /usr/include/g++ out of the way before extracting it and save a copy of your /usr/lib/libstdc++* files as well. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Is it just me or has -current suddenly got massively unstable?

2002-07-23 Thread Peter Wemm
Yann Berthier wrote: On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: It might be just me because I swapped an ISA 'si' card for a PCI version, b ut the problems I've been seeing are pretty spectacular. I'm regularly seeing the following panics: - selwakeup() taking fatal traps (always

Is it just me or has -current suddenly got massively unstable?

2002-07-22 Thread Peter Wemm
anybody else seen this sort of thing today? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Problem with agpgart on current, XFree86-4, Matrox G400 video

2002-07-17 Thread Peter Wemm
to the release scripts so that the agp device was filtered out of the BOOTMFS kernel image. (A quick grep -r for BOOTMFS should show up the sed scripts that turn GENERIC into BOOTMFS in src/release). The 'agp' device isn't likely to hurt anything, is it? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: HEADS UP, beware of pmap changes.

2002-07-13 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: This is mostly a FYI because I do not expect major problems this time. I have been extensively testing it in a handful of configurations. As murphy would dictate, something fishy is going on. In the last 12 hours or so (I had a long sleep), I've

HEADS UP, beware of pmap changes.

2002-07-12 Thread Peter Wemm
of this change that I thought were working but I didn't want to risk them yet. If I've broken something new, please yell. I must confess that I have not tried to use vm86 doscmd or anything perverse like that. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All

Re: HEADS UP, beware of pmap changes.

2002-07-12 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: This is mostly a FYI because I do not expect major problems this time. I have been extensively testing it in a handful of configurations. As murphy would dictate, something fishy is going on. In the last 12 hours or so (I had a long sleep), I've started getting apparent

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
do finer grained shootdowns. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 11-Jul-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: Here is my proposed fix for the page-zeroing problem w/ SMP. It is untested (I'm about to test it)... I'm looking for comments on the concept. If the comments are positive and my testing

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
disruptive than slashing through userland and fixing something that is already perfectly correct and legal. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
) { printf(NULL); err(1, NULL); return 0; } peter@panther[4:22pm]~-106 cc -O -Wformat -c foo.c peter@panther[4:22pm]~-107 ie: it looks like it is completely disabled. Maybe the sparc64 tinderbox host is simply out of sync with -current? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
on having /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo installed, but I would wager that you will not miss it. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread Peter Wemm
= vtopte(tmpva); *pte = pa | PG_RW | PG_V | pgeflag; size -= PAGE_SIZE; tmpva += PAGE_SIZE; - pa += PAGE_SIZE; } invltlb(); Excuse me while I go outside and shoot myself. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread Peter Wemm
John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

fsck hosed?

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) # halt Notice how it completely exited after da0f and printing WAS MODIFIED ? Not to mention how we cannot shut down cleanly. :-( Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars

Re: current.freebsd.org

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: status of KSE merge

2002-07-05 Thread Peter Wemm
. This is responsible for things like vipw failing after ^Z/fg (editor=vi), mergemaster failing on ^Z/fg etc. (it was mergemaster that tipped me off on this.) Applications that use interval timers would be suffering from this pretty badly. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: Recommended MP development machines...

2002-07-04 Thread Peter Wemm
which puts me into the USB danger-zone enough as it is.. but what happens when this bug is triggered? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Another post-KSE bug?

2002-07-01 Thread Peter Wemm
having fun now, I thought I'd mention this one too. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: this ring a bell with anyone?

2002-06-27 Thread Peter Wemm
(e.g. to load into VMWare or via netboot). Uhh, Terry.. This has absolutely nothing to do with the problem. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: What is going on?

2002-06-26 Thread Peter Wemm
, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-03 Thread Peter Wemm
reports from you, always in a different place? I was wondering about that too... Admins, any signs of faulty RAM or cooling problems in ref5? The single biggest problem seemed to be NFS, but you're not using that anymore are you? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-31 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you want final commit approval/objections, you really need to either include or go to developers@ instead since they're the ones dealing with actual commit process. s/developers/arch/ I wasn't clear with this comment

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-31 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But he said he was asking for permission to commit it (Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again), so he should be talking with other committers. I guess I just don't see why he needs our permission, as long as he's given us

Re: XFree86-4-libraries build error

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
-current in the body of the message Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: XFree86-4-libraries build error

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020530 01:01] wrote: Wilko Bulte wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote: FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up gcc-3.1 appears to have broken #pragma weak foo = bar

Re: libstdc++ problem with recent CURRENT

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
is that David and I configured something differently or ./configure found something different on our systems when generating config.h for the library. I'll go back over this again. I'm pretty sure we had different locale settings, but I'm a little suprised about the math differences. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
commit process. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Solved: libstdc++ problem with recent CURRENT

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
the long double versions and others that do not. To be sure we're all on the same page, simply uncommenting stubs.c solves your problem with no libm changes, right? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-30 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: UMA lock

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm writes: As you said, _sleeping_ is the problem. M_WAITOK means you may sleep if you like. ie: it is a time bomb waiting for the right low memory conditio n which will then explode with a 100% authentic crash or lock up

Re: UMA lock

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: I think _sleeping_ is a problem, but allocation with M_WAITOK shouldn't be, given it's strange definition of waiting. This is one of those hacks that John Baldwin was talking about earlier... As you said, _sleeping_ is the problem. M_WAITOK

Re: UMA lock

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm writes: As you said, _sleeping_ is the problem. M_WAITOK means you may sleep if you like. ie: it is a time bomb waiting for the right low memory condit ion which will then explode with a 100

Re: buildworld failure

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
directory. There is a bug in /bin/sh. You might like to try something like this: rm -rf /usr/obj/* cd /usr/src/bin/sh make clean make obj make depend make make install As long as your /usr/src is up to date, that should save you. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: gcc3.1 problems: undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
Have you done a 'make world' in the last 24 hours or so? What does this show: ls -l /usr/bin/c++ /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 /usr/include/g++/bits/c++config.h They should all exist and be roughly the same time/date. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII

2002-05-29 Thread Peter Wemm
format just like everybody else.) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-28 Thread Peter Wemm
, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: UMA lock

2002-05-28 Thread Peter Wemm
waiting is explicitly not allowed. There are other functions that can tsleep as well that we have not added checks for yet, so this is likely just the tip of the iceberg. :-( Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go

Re: UMA lock

2002-05-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Terry Lambert wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: The bug is that things are calling things like malloc with M_WAITOK when waiting is explicitly not allowed. There are other functions that can tsleep as well that we have not added checks for yet, so this is likely just the tip of the iceberg

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: perl: Perl is not installed, try 'pkg_add -r perl' Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). How about this: Index: perl.c

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Peter Wemm
, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, not stripped Yes, we do run with x86 userland VM size = 4GB on freebsd/ia64 since the kernel is elsewhere :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Stop in /d/home/des/tinderbox/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /d/home/des/tinderbox/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /d/home/des/tinderbox/src. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL

Re: buildkernel broken at sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14

2002-05-17 Thread Peter Wemm
until %b is implemented in GCC 3.1 . Add NO_WERROR=true to /etc/make.conf for the time being. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
to 'poisoned' malloc/calloc/etc calls. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers?

2002-05-09 Thread Peter Wemm
. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

HEADS UP - gcc-3.1 in progress!

2002-05-09 Thread Peter Wemm
David O'Brien is in the process of committing gcc-3.1. If you are not prepared to do your own fixing, now would be a good time to avoid -current. It is a big task and will take a while to finish, so please be patient! Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: smmsp user check in Makefile.inc1

2002-05-03 Thread Peter Wemm
Care to whip up a patch? I'll commit it for you. (I'd do it but I'm working on something) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: PHY patch, please test.

2002-05-01 Thread Peter Wemm
? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Recent commit to sys/kern/kern_environment.c broke reading tunables

2002-04-27 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: Maxime Henrion wrote: Hi, I think I may have found the bug. Could someone test the attached patch and report if it fixes the problem or not ? Thanks in advance, Maxime No joy: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #8: Sat Apr 27 13:48:13 PDT 2002 [EMAIL

Re: Recent commit to sys/kern/kern_environment.c broke reading tunables

2002-04-27 Thread Peter Wemm
Maxime Henrion wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: This turned out to be part of the problem. I committed your patch and another followup that got the rest of it. The outstanding problems were: 1) checkmethod caused use_kenv to be set only once and the next time it was called, use_kenv would stay

Re: linux broken?

2002-04-26 Thread Peter Wemm
in other modules without registering a dependency for this reason. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: Minor things: swi_net: unregistered isr number

2002-04-26 Thread Peter Wemm
Matthew N. Dodd wrote: On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: This is well known. If we recieve an ARP frame before we sent one, then we print this. eg: a broadcast ARP packet will trigger it. dhclient etc use bpf etc so ARP isn't initialized at this point. We could just put

Re: Minor things: swi_net: unregistered isr number

2002-04-25 Thread Peter Wemm
, even for non-DHCP stuff. I'm not sure what is causing it. This is well known. If we recieve an ARP frame before we sent one, then we print this. eg: a broadcast ARP packet will trigger it. dhclient etc use bpf etc so ARP isn't initialized at this point. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm

Re: implementing linux mmap2 syscall

2002-04-24 Thread Peter Wemm
: if (params (i = narg * sizeof(int)) (error = copyin(params, (caddr_t)args, (u_int)i))) { (narg comes from the syscall table). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5

Re: NetBSD sort l10n: I give up!

2002-04-07 Thread Peter Wemm
again. There is nothing significant that is still on the vendor branch that is worth messing around with. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: patch: make syslog stop spamming any root it finds...

2002-04-05 Thread Peter Wemm
, and rather have people log in and 'su' instead. But even then, it's I would rather see it dead. :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: kldxref problem

2002-04-02 Thread Peter Wemm
-CURRENT builds on 4-STABLE systems, not in cross-archetecture builds. That is a different set of problems. cross-version builds have always been very trouble-prone. same-version cross builds are far less of a problem. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >