Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2 support for distribution patches)

2000-01-23 Thread Akinori MUSHA aka knu
At Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:26:48 +0100 (CET), Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't like bzip2 for the sole fact that it takes _ages_ to compress files, compared to gzip. Saving 10% or 20% on disk space is not worth wasting = 10 times more CPU time than gzip. Disk space is cheap

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2 support for distribution patches)

2000-01-22 Thread Akinori MUSHA aka knu
At Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:42:55 -0500 (EST), Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A case would have to be built that bzip2 does something critical that cannot be done without bzip2. Else, it stays as a fine port. Heck, emacs is a fine port too, but it'll never get into the base system. Hmm...