At Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:26:48 +0100 (CET),
Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like bzip2 for the sole fact that it takes _ages_ to
compress files, compared to gzip. Saving 10% or 20% on disk
space is not worth wasting = 10 times more CPU time than gzip.
Disk space is cheap
At Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:42:55 -0500 (EST),
Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A case would have to be built that bzip2 does something critical that
cannot be done without bzip2. Else, it stays as a fine port. Heck, emacs
is a fine port too, but it'll never get into the base system.
Hmm...