> I've just updated to 5.2-BETA today and have noticed that my spamd is
> now rejecting all connections from spamc because they are not coming
> from 127.0.0.1 any more. It's now using my public IP address of 82.x.x.x:
>
> Nov 22 14:38:30 womble spamd[657]: unauthorized connection from
> 82-32-
Since my last current (FreeBSD renaissance.homeip.net 5.1-CURRENT
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Fri Nov 21 17:49:36 CET 2003), I couldn't
use anymore local network program like mlnet (telnet localhost 4000)
or squid as my adress is 81.65.xx.xx (from my modem-cable) instead
of 127.0.0.1.
I didn't have
I got trapped in the mess too but finally repaired it with a livecd. Let's
hope the path for 5.2 RELEASE will be smoother for the less adventurous of us.
> I just ran into this very same thing today on a brand new installation. Upon
> reboot I can't even get to a shell. Was rather hoping someon
> On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Quoting Scott Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Hello all, I'm rephrasing my previous question to reflect new findings
> > > in my situation in the hopes that someone may have an idea of what's
> > > going on here (see thread "Internal
I used wine on 5.1-RELEASE in order to convert some binary cdrom format other
than .iso (all those nice .ccd, .nrg, ...). I tried playing on my own copy of
Starcraft but didn't successed yet however I didn't take much time to work on
it.
Except old games or mirc32 (for my gf), I'm not so much in
> There have been threads about data corruption in RAM on P4 and other
> i386 machines on this list. I also observed the problem, on my laptop
> with 5.0-R. It seemed to go away with 5.1-R, on the laptop.
>
> Recently I upgraded my home PC which is a P4 2.0A from 4.8-R to 5.1-R.
> No problems a
> Hi!
>
> Is anybody working on this critical bug?
> Do you know what's the source of the problem? According to the PR report, it seems
> that mount_ext2fs works on some 5.x system...
Working fine with ext3 and 5.0-p7.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li
> I've implemented per-executable ELF prebinding:
>
> ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/prebind.patch
>
> Initial performance measurements are very encouraging.
Is it similar to Linux's prelink implementation ?
How does it compare with (feature, performance) ?
_
