Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

2003-11-16 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Bill Vermillion wrote: I don't think saving that little space on the / partition is as important as having everthing in sbin being able to stand alone no matter what is corrupted. man 8 rescue Bruce. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RC1 packages

2003-07-03 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Jesse D. Guardiani wrote: If I go ahead and install 5.1-RC1 now from ISO CDROM, will I have access to packages that are newer than the ones that come with FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE? Or will they be the same packages as 5.0-RELEASE? Or will I not have access to packages

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-01 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Scott Long wrote: It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will* address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for taking so long. Scott, you're hardly the only person with the ability to test this problem. In fact, you're

Re: adduser(8) in 5.0-R

2003-01-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Mike Makonnen wrote: I have cc'ed bmah, because I think it should be in the errata. Done. Thanks! Bruce. msg50715/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RELENG_5 branch ?

2003-01-16 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Joao Pedras wrote: Will there be a RELENG_5 where we would get 5.0-STABLE ? Pretty much in the s ame way it has been up until now... Yes, but not right away. Please see the early adopter's guide for more on this point (it's EARLY.HTM in the top-level directory of

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 RC3 now available

2003-01-15 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Craig Reyenga wrote: No matter what, disc#1 has a finite amount of space and it's going to be impossible to come up with a combination of packages that keeps everyone happy. Sooner or later, popular comes down to somebody's judgement. To see what's currently in

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 RC3 now available

2003-01-14 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Craig Reyenga wrote: These mentioned licensing issues make sense, however I still think that there should be some sort of system to ensure big and/or popular packages to make it to CD #1. No matter what, disc#1 has a finite amount of space and it's going to be

Re: cvsweb

2003-01-13 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andrew Thompson wrote: Has the cvs website stopped updating itself? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/www/en/releases/5.0R/ is showing ver 1.131 of todo.sgml but http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/www/en/releases/5.0R/todo.sgml is showing ver 1.120

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 RC3 now available

2003-01-13 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andy Farkas wrote: Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of FreeBSD 5.0. Perhaps I do things in a non-standard way, but its worked for the last 8 years from 2.x through to 4.7-stable. Firstly, I download 'floppies' and create the 2

Re: DP2: nfsiod

2002-11-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Robert Watson wrote: Note that the rpc.lockd support is still experimental in 5.0 for client-side locking, and as such, might not be good to enable by default. I notice that in the original message for this thread, there's reference to release documentation

Re: HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before an installworld.

2002-10-29 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Doug Barton wrote: This should go on the Comprehensive guide to updating from source to 5.0 that I'm sure our trusty release engineers are producing? Some of this is described in the early adopter's guide (still a work in progress) that I committed to the release

Re: 5.0-20021027-CURRENT.iso cdrom will not mount

2002-10-29 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I wrote: If memory serves me right, John wrote: How many other people are testing the 5.0 sysinstall booted from a cd and running a local (cd/dvd) install? Try booting and installing from the iso at usw2.freebsd.org and see if it works for you. I'm able to boot and install

Re: 5.0-20021027-CURRENT.iso cdrom will not mount

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, John wrote: How many other people are testing the 5.0 sysinstall booted from a cd and running a local (cd/dvd) install? Try booting and installing from the iso at usw2.freebsd.org and see if it works for you. I'm able to boot and install CURRENT snapshot

Re: Installing from CD and MAKEDEV

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes: At Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:53 + (UTC), kuriyama wrote: I've created install CD with make iso.1 (with sources few hours before). I'm trying to install fresh current box with this

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, The Anarcat wrote: On Tue Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [...] And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away. [...] 9 days??? There won't be another DP? Um, not exactly. The current release date isn't until 20 November

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Steve Kargl wrote: I've noticed many commits on cvs-all include an Approved by: re line, but I haven't seen an official code slush/freeze announcement. Feature freeze started 16 October. New feature commits (as opposed to bugfix or doc commits) should have RE

Re: UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3)

2002-10-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:28:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: It's already in UPDATING with the rm -rf /usr/include/g++ line in the steps for going from 4 to -current. =20 Oops, I missed this when I looked for it. Thanks. Actually,

Release-building saga continues

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I successfully built an i386 miniinst.iso image, using a repository updated around mid-day Saturday (California time). When I burned and booted this image, I landed in sysinstall (yay!) with a dialog box complaining Couldn't create directory /tmp: Read-only file system (d'oh!). There's a number

Re: libmd bug on -CURRENT

2002-09-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bruce A. Mah wrote: If memory serves me right, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Good catch. I'm surprised the compiler doesn't whine. Thanks, and me too. Warnings are mostly turned off for not unimportant places like

libmd bug on -CURRENT

2002-09-06 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I think I've found a bug in libmd on -CURRENT, in which attempting to compute the MD5 checksum (using MD5File(3)) of a zero-length file generates an error. A trivial way to trigger this bug (which isn't present in 4-STABLE) is: ref4:bmah% uname -a FreeBSD ref4.freebsd.org 4.7-PRERELEASE

Re: libmd bug on -CURRENT

2002-09-06 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Good catch. I'm surprised the compiler doesn't whine. Thanks, and me too. Bruce. PS. Actually I'm surprised that nobody caught the problem in the past five months...this bug prevented release builds from 5-CURRENT hosts. Maybe I'm the

Re: CURRENT's termcap broken

2002-08-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: # Do you have time to commit mention of it to UPDATING? If so, please # draw Bruce Mah's attention to the delta so that he can steal your text # for use in the release notes. If not, I'll get around to it eventually. # :-) I just added

Re: buildworld failure in libfetch

2002-06-05 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Michael Nottebrock wrote: David Wolfskill wrote: Were you running with -j ? 'cause the error appears to be with libssl, not libfetch. Nope. I've seen this too, starting with a pristine /usr/obj and no -j option. I wonder if this has to do with the recent SSL

Re: Call for Review: allow sysinstall to tweak tri-value sendmail_enable

2002-05-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Makoto Matsushita wrote: Following patch creates submenu to change the sendmail_enable value. However, I don't know who want to set this variable to 'NO'. If selecting 'YES' and 'NONE' is enough, I'll try to make another patch. Any comments? I want to push this

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Bruce A. Mah
was written by .An Jeremy D. Lea Aq [EMAIL PROTECTED] , partially based on a Perl script written by .An Bruce A. Mah Aq [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - 4. You commented that you didn't like the way we did -s before. If you think it'd be better as (say) a regex or a globbing expression, I don't believe

IPv6 header breakage on -CURRENT?

2002-04-30 Thread Bruce A. Mah
Hi folks-- It's been pointed out to me that a program I wrote (net/pchar in ports) can't compile on -CURRENT. After a little poking around, I've narrowed the problem down to the following test case: tomcat:bmah% cat foo.cc #include sys/types.h #include sys/param.h #include netdb.h #include

Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( 1 week Feature Slush )

2002-03-14 Thread Bruce A. Mah
[Trimming Cc list a little bit] If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote: Actually, with my CVS hat on, I have a *huge* problem with this. In the future, if you see such huge problems come up, a little more advance notice might be nice. :-( We have a large number of temporary repo

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem

2002-03-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Bruce A. Mah wrote: [snip] Disregard. I hit the wrong button in my MUA. Sorry for the spammage. Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem

2002-03-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: : :You came to the conclusion that only *your decision* on what was :an appropriate proceedure was the one that mattered. That's not :the way this project works. You can't act unilaterally. When people :ask you to hold off (and they even

Re: HEADS UP: DHCP 3.0.1RC6 imported

2002-02-19 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Murray Stokely wrote: DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT. Cool. We're still shipping just the client part, right? Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: -current vs. -stable network performance

2001-12-13 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Matthew Dillon wrote: I've noticed that -current has much lower TCP performance. I haven't had time to investigate it but I presume there is some overhead somewhere that is killing it. Here's a data point but I'm not sure how useful it is. At the start

HEADS UP: Release notes reorg

2001-10-12 Thread Bruce A. Mah
The release notes for -CURRENT are a real mess. The current ordering rule is something like chronological ordering of items within a section, but keep related items together. I've just begun converting the release notes (one section at a time) to an alphabetical sorting (on manpage references,

Re: kldxref broken, maybe?

2001-10-10 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 06:25:48PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I do make -CURRENT worlds every night on a -STABLE box, and the kldxref(8) miss is non-fatal: ... === wi install -c -o root

Re: kldxref broken, maybe?

2001-10-09 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:19:22PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Warner Losh wrote: In message p05100307b7cfef6da22f@[207.76.207.129] Mark Peek writes: : Install a -current kernel on a 4.X or pre-kldxref (before 9/10/01) : 5.X system. I

Re: For your amusement..

2001-10-08 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote: Connected to ia64.wemm.org. Escape character is '^]'. FreeBSD/ia64 (ia64.wemm.org) (ttyp0) That's totally awesome. Congratulations to all involved! Now, how long before I need to start worrying about release notes for the ia64? :-) Bruce.

Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc /usr/doc)

2001-06-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 00:51:32 +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote: o tell Nik about the change. Nik is responsible for doc/ tree. o discussion about when we do repo-copy. To minimize the side effect of the change, prior

Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc /usr/doc)

2001-06-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: There would have been less confusion if your heads-up had actually been= =20 sent with enough advance warning that people would have actually *read*= =20 it. I agree, but just imagine that I have assumption that Peter already

Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc /usr/doc)

2001-06-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:42:27 -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: =20 Immediate MFC is against our policy, isn't?=3D20 =20 So is immediate breakage. Yes, but fixed. It's still broken. It seems that people forget that every big change

Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc /usr/doc)

2001-06-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I'm going to respond to exactly one line of your email: Fix RELNOTESng affected pathes to new scheme without MFCing This is the solution I am favoring, pending some discussion with nik. Please let me deal with it. Thanks. I am deliberately *not* responding to the remainder of this

Re: anyone seen these outside of alpha? or on non-SMP?

2001-06-04 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, David Wolfskill wrote: Someone should test and commit Tor's patch. I didn't have time to check whether it fixed the problems before I left (and I'm sure as hell not going to update back to -current remotely to check myself :-) FWIW, I applied that patch to the

Re: freelist corruption: more info

2001-05-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I wrote: Trying to fix some make release problems, I've kept running into the same freelist corruption problems that kris and dougb experienced earlier this week. Main difference is that I notice when the box (-CURRENT from 29 May, GENERIC kernel, UP) crashes. :-p At dougb's urging, I

freelist corruption: more info

2001-05-30 Thread Bruce A. Mah
Trying to fix some make release problems, I've kept running into the same freelist corruption problems that kris and dougb experienced earlier this week. Main difference is that I notice when the box (-CURRENT from 29 May, GENERIC kernel, UP) crashes. :-p Not being a -CURRENT guru, I haven't

Re: make release failure

2001-05-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
. :-( Could you please try the attached, untested patch? I don't know enough about the release build process to know if it should work, but I guess it's worth a shot. Bruce Mah (cc'd) should know whether it's the Right(tm) fix. Just got back from a road trip...my brain is a little fried now

HEADS UP: RELNOTESng now default in -CURRENT, *.TXT files removed

2001-05-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
RELNOTESng is now the default for -CURRENT release builds. Floppy images get ASCII renderings only, while the CDROM and FTP areas get both ASCII and HTML. To disable all release note documentation building (i.e. for minimal builds), define NORELNOTES at release-building time. Note that release

Re: lock order reversals, anyone?

2001-05-03 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Matthew Jacob wrote: T-o-T about 24 hours ago: ??? lock order reversal 1st lockmgr interlock last acquired @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:239 2nd 0xfe0025df8548 process lock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:542 3rd 0xfeaab8d0 lockmgr interlock

Re: PATCH: partial fix for broken make release...

2001-05-02 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Terry Lambert wrote: o The files jade_1.2.1-13.diff.gz and pdf_sec.ps are not available from any of the listed mirros in the ports hierarchy, so they can not be correctly installed, and a doc build can not complete. The workaround is to

HEADS UP: RELNOTESng committed to 5-CURRENT

2001-04-27 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I've just committed RELNOTESng to 5-CURRENT. If you missed the earlier discussions on these lists, RELNOTESng is the rewrite and restructuring of FreeBSD's *.TXT documentation files into DocBook. All of the files live under src/release/doc, and src/release/doc/README has more information. As

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:06:12PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Beaupre (LMC) writ es: : Hey whatever. Let's just keep a rendered TXT version where it always : (ie. in the src/release... cvs) was but keep the

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-26 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote: Like it. OK, thanks, that's a good start... My main concern is that this is in the src/ tree. As other people have said this is going to complicate things for src/ folks who just want up to date release notes, This problem (which I agree is

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
[Please keep me as one of the explicit recipients of this email. Thanks.] If memory serves me right, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: takhus Perhaps the *.TXT files could be periodically regenerated to their takhus current location to 1) avoid a POLA violation and 2) allow for at takhus least

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:42:07PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: As UPDATING may contain information nessecary to run make world, it can't b e built by make world. Chicken and egg, methinks... Possibly. But I was not refering to UPDATING. Just

Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: On a slightly related note, do you object, or have plans to, build the release notes with the web site? It would solve this problem very nicely. Hi Dima-- No objections, but no plans right now either. Mostly because I don't know enough about

[RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT

2001-04-24 Thread Bruce A. Mah
(Apologies to -doc people who have probably heard this ad nauseum.) Over the past few months, I've been working on a project that I've taken to calling RELNOTESng, which is the overhaul of RELNOTES.TXT and related files that we package along with a FreeBSD distribution. I've been soliciting

One more typo in src/release/Makefile, rev 1.612? (w/patch)

2001-04-16 Thread Bruce A. Mah
Hi David-- Thanks for fixing the typo in src/release/Makefile. I think however the real cause of the error that people were seeing is a typo on the line above...there should (I think) be a " \" at the end of the previous line. So what happens is that the "make kernel-reinstall-debug" gets run

Re: Re[2]: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost

2001-04-10 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, David Xu wrote: [dirpref stuff] Any plan to MFC? I am interesting to see it in 4.3-RELEASE. I'm pretty sure it won't be in 4.3-RELEASE. In case you didn't realize, RELENG_4 has been in code freeze for some weeks now, preparing for a release next week. "Code

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-05 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Brooks Davis writes: | On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:28:38PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | Well I can't see that since it's not an array and the values come | from iterating through Cisco's API and a direct query for the | transmit key. Look

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-02 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Bruce A. Mah writes: | 1. Seems like I needed to ifconfig the interface up before my other | commands would take effect. I don't recall needing to do any such | thing with the old driver before I could do ancontrol. Is this a | change

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I stupidly wrote: it is not immediately obvious to me how to set ad-hoc mode using ifconfig(8)). Please disregard...I see it now. Must be my allergy meds, yeah, that's it... :-) Bruce. PGP signature

-CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/mptable?

2001-03-23 Thread Bruce A. Mah
Hi Bruce-- A recent commit of yours to src/usr.sbin/mptable/Makefile had the commit message: Fixed style bugs (use normal formatting for assignment, and don't override the correct default for MAN1). Are you sure this is right? The default MANSECT for src/usr.sbin is 8, not 1, but

CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
This is a first for me, I think...finding a CURRENT buildworld bogon. Freshly cvsup-ed -CURRENT system, trying to buildworld: [much output] === usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map make: don't know how to make .o. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/amd. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Michael C . Wu" wrote: cvs diff: Diffing . Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- Makefile

Re: CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Michael C . Wu" wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:13:17PM -0600, Michael C . Wu scribbled: | On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:03:29PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah scribbled: I have just finished making the patch to fix this problem. I will start the buil

Re: CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote: "Michael C . Wu" wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:13:17PM -0600, Michael C . Wu scribbled: | On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:03:29PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah scribbled: I have just finished making the patch to fix this problem. I

Re: CURRENT breakage in usr.sbin/amd/mk-amd-map

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Peter Wemm wrote: If SRCS is undefined, then SRCS=${PROG}.c. ie: peter@daintree[7:30pm]~src/usr.sbin/sicontrol-283 grep SRCS Makefile peter@daintree[7:30pm]~src/usr.sbin/sicontrol-284 make -V SRCS sicontrol.c peter@daintree[7:30pm]~src/usr.sbin/sicontrol-285

Re: pkg_update

2001-02-09 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled: | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not fro m | ports. Because it is a

Re: pkg_update

2001-02-09 Thread Bruce A. Mah
[moved to -ports] If memory serves me right, "Leif Neland" wrote: Couldn't it be made possible to use just the update-of-dependencies part of p kg_update without doing the pkg_delete/pkg_install bit? Perhaps I'll try... Manipulating the bits is relatively straightforward. Doing so in a

Re: sysinstall.8 Breaking buildworld

2001-01-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Crist J. Clark" wrote: I had some buildworld failures earlier this week. In src/share/man/man8 the Makefile includes code to get the sysinstall.8 manpage. Since the manpage lives in src/release, this requires that you CVSup src-release. I had not been. This broke

Re: Current-ISO

2001-01-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Sidwell, Josh" wrote: I have been unsucessfully trying to build an ISO image of the 5.0-CURRENT branch for the past several weeks. Is anyone aware of a tool to pull the latest tree and turn it into an ISO image? http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/hackers.html#CUSTREL

Re: sysinstall.8 Breaking buildworld

2001-01-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ben Smithurst wrote: yeah, but it can be used as many things. If invoked as "rm" sysinstall behaves just like the real rm, it happens to be one big binary. The thing in /stand is a crunchgen(8) binary. sysinstall itself is (chug, chug) 850K. After being stripped,

Re: Other Linux stuff...

2000-11-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: So, from a pure ELF layout point of view, both shared objects and executables are the same. But a shared library is not guaranteed to be executable. Allowing shared objects to be executed is in violation with the specs: This may be a really

Re: feature set for 5.0

2000-09-01 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, David Lebel wrote: I'm currently using the -STABLE branch of FreeBSD, and I'm wondering if there is a page somewhere that lists the feature set planned for 5.0 when it is released? How will it compare to the current 4.x branch ? It's really hard to predict the

Re: SCSI DAT tape question

2000-07-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Robert Small" wrote: I'm running an adaptec controller (1542CF) with a Sony SDT-5000. I'm running: reeBSD (5.0-2511-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-2511-CURRENT #4: Thu Jul 6 20:31:41 CDT 2000) When I issue the command "camcontrol eject sa0" I receive: Error

Re: Check for ports updates

2000-06-06 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Thomas Schuerger wrote: Is there already a tool that checks the installed ports for available updates in /usr/ports? I've written such a tool, which seems to work fine already. Anyone interested? pkg_version(1) Ah, haven't seen that before. The

Re: Header includes and defines in freebsd 4-Stable [ISC-Bugs#102] (bind9)

2000-05-01 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Visigoth wrote: It seems that there may be a small socket implementation issue with freebsd 4-Stable. I have been in disscussion with a few people from the isc bind 9 bug tracking department, and it seems that for the macro CMSG_NXTHDR to function in freebsd

Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h'

2000-03-21 Thread Bruce A. Mah
'net/pchar' port is now broken. Yes, this problem is already found by Bruce A. Mah and some mail is exchanged between related people. I'm doing a pointrev to pchar to "fix" this problem...see below. What must be done to solve this ? Is it possible to '#include sys/param

Re: FDDI cards in -current

2000-03-16 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Christoph Kukulies wrote: Planning a router between FDDI and Fast Ethernet I'm wondering if I'm on the safe side when using FreeBSD 4.0-current for this project rather than being more conservative and use an older version of the OS. You mean 4.0-stable, right? :-)

Re: ipv6 and rc.conf questions

2000-03-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: And now I think the problem is that entry name, rtadvd_enable="NO" is not intuitive for users. So how about changing the name to something like, ipv6_to_be_defaultrouter="NO" and if it is set to YES, then rc.network6 invoke rtadvd

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

2000-03-06 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Jose M. Alcaide" wrote: Now that I have several machines running FreeBSD 4.0, I started to play with IPv6. It's fun! I have plans to set up a v6-over-v4 tunnel and connect to the 6Bone. I read /usr/share/examples/IPv6/USAGE, /usr/share/doc/IPv6/IMPLEMENTATION

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

2000-03-06 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, David Malone wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: : + Openssh isn't 100% compatible with ssh, so some care needs to : + be taken in its operation. : : This sounds bad. Are you referring to the -o syntax

Re: IPv6

2000-02-21 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: I ran across a few problems after I remade world. The new scoped address syntax breaks /etc/rc.network6. In particular, some lines that look like: Sorry not to announce it yet, but scoped addr format will still change, like below.

Re: IPv6

2000-02-18 Thread Bruce A. Mah
The only changes I have for you are small typos... /etc/rc.conf: "assigne router prefix" should be: "assign router prefix" /etc/rc.network6: "if you instead want to route such packets to a "default" interface": Looks to me like this comment is not applicable

Re: IPv6

2000-02-08 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ollivier Robert wrote: Please use consistent names like "mroute6d_flags" and "mroute6d_program". Thanks...these changes will be reflected in the next version I post. For your information, I didn't use different naming conventions just for the hell of it...I just

Re: IPv6

2000-02-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Kurt Bauer wrote: could you please tell me how to configure a IPv6 only Interface. I want the Interface to fetch its prefix from a Router. But the Interface only gets a Link-Local address when I make a 'ifconfig vx0 up'. I worked fine with 3.3 and KAME, but as is

Re: IPv6

2000-02-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: The two tweaks I remember off-hand was that the paths to commands are (of course) different under a 4.0-CURRENT environment and that ndp in -CURRENT works a little different than in the KAME snapshots I was using earlier. What point

Re: IPv6

2000-02-07 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: In KAME environment, IPv6 related configurations are done at last of rc.conf. So it is at almost end of configuration. It turns out this won't work real well, because if I do this, then inetd gets started before we start up the IPv6

Re: UPDATING

2000-02-03 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:53:49AM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote: Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 02:51:11PM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote: I did the following and it worked for me: cd /usr/src make buildworld