Recovery? recent make world rendered system unusable (64 bit change)

2003-11-18 Thread Chris Shenton
I've been running 5.1-CURRENT for a while and a couple nights ago did a make world. After a couple hours building, my system was unusable. Critical binaries like rm, ls, mtree, sh failed, reporting Exec format error. I can't login, not even single user. I can no longer even boot single user.

Re: Recovery? recent make world rendered system unusable (64 bit change)

2003-11-18 Thread Chris Shenton
masta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The easy way is to grab a recent livecd from the jp snapshot service. [ http://livecd.sourceforge.net/ ] With the jpsnap livecd I was able to boot, copy all the working binaries from the cdrom over the corrupt binaries on the local HDD. I suggest you try the

Re: Recovery? recent make world rendered system unusable (64 bit change)

2003-11-18 Thread Chris Shenton
Barney Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Re-install/upgrade from a cd. Upgrade should leave your files alone. Thanks, Barney -- that's what I did and it saved my butt. A few folks suggested either LiveCD images or fixit functionality. I was kinda dead in the water and didn't think I could

How to create distribution for later NFS sysinstall on other box?

2003-10-14 Thread Chris Shenton
Some of my systems are 5.1-CURRENT but I still have some older 4.x boxes. I'd like to upgrade them to the same OS as my 5.1 boxes. It seems stupid to feed them boot floppies then FTP the OS across the WAN from freebsd.org or mirrors. I expect there's a way to build a distribution on my main

make buildworld: Signal 11; Illegal instruction

2003-07-31 Thread Chris Shenton
I'm trying to do a make buildworld on my system: FreeBSD PECTOPAH.shenton.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #2: Tue Jul 1 19:48:37 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PECTOPAH i386 And it keeps dying at various points early in the build. It's a different location each time, some

Re: make buildworld: Signal 11; Illegal instruction

2003-07-31 Thread Chris Shenton
Chris Shenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *** Signal 11 ... Illegal instruction (core dumped) *** Error code 132 Also seeing *** Signal 4 if it matters. This sounds way too flakey to be SW. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-23 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try the very untested patch below ... Well, it seems to be working now, but not necessarily due to this patch. I lost two of the four drives on my ATA RAID card (RAID-5) so lost my entire system :-(. Rebuilt the box from the 5.0-RELEASE floppies/net then

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-18 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try the very untested patch below ... RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c,v When I do the patch, how much of the OS do I need to rebuild, just do a make install in the .../src/sys/kern dir? Rebuild the OS from the top dir? Rebuild the kernel?

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-18 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try the very untested patch below ... RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c,v retrieving revision 1.150 Try the very untested patch below ... diff -u -r1.150 uipc_syscalls.c --- uipc_syscalls.c 12 Jun 2003 05:52:09 - 1.150 +++

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for doing the testing. I just committed this patch. Seems fine here too -- many thanks. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-17 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I doubt it. I checked in a fix for this problem today so you should get the fix when you next cvsup. Yup, many thanks. Can you break into ddb and do a ps to find out what state all the processes are in? I'm a newbie to ddb. Was able to get a ps from a

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-17 Thread Chris Shenton
Oh, FWIW, I did a cvsup and rebuilt the OS and kernel then did a mergemaster about 30 minutes ago in order to get your fix to my qmail issue. So I'm running about as CURRENT as possible. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-17 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you have another machine and a null modem cable you can redirect the system console of the machine to be debugged to a serial port and run some comm software on the other machine so that you can capture all the output from ddb. OK, I'll give that a

5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepable locks

2003-06-16 Thread Chris Shenton
(I don't know if this has any relation to the problems I reported yesterday with qmail-send consuming 100% cpu after 5.0 to 5.1 upgrade.) After booting 5.1-CURRENT the system runs fine for a while. Then later most disk i/o related actions seem to hang. E.g., system works but when cron kicks off

qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Chris Shenton
I've been running qmail for years and like it, installed pretty much per www.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and -CURRENT and qmail was fine. When I just upgraded to 5.1-CURRENT a couple days back, the qmail-send process started using all CPU. last pid:

DELL CERC amr RAID card beeping, dead drive? how to diagnose/fix?

2003-05-29 Thread Chris Shenton
I have a DELL 600SC which came with a DELL CERC RAID controller. It's recognized by FreeBSD-CURRENT as an amr device even though it's got four ATA disk channels on it instead of the documented SCSI drives for the PERC controller. I have 4x WD1200JB ATA 120GB disks on it which have been running

Re: A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-05 Thread Chris Shenton
John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Dell PowerEdge] What model? There are quite a few PowerEdges out It's a 600SC - P4 1.8 - Perc3/SC FWIW, I had absolutely no trouble booting and installing 5.0-R on my 600SC, with the DELL-supplied CERC RAID

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-22 Thread Chris Shenton
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # ls -lR /conf drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Dec 21 10:37 base drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 19 21:56 default ... /conf/base/etc: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 18 Dec 19 22:10 diskless_remount -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6 Dec 19 22:22 md_size ...

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-22 Thread Chris Shenton
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you do this pxeboot will attempt to load the kernel via TFTP instead of via NFS. You then put your kernel in /tftpboot right along side a copy of pxeboot. This allows you to netboot a different kernel then the one in the

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-19 Thread Chris Shenton
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 4.x and -current use the same mechanism, except 4.x uses MFS and -current uses MD. 4.x uses /etc/diskless[12] while 5.x (by default) uses /etc/rc.d/(init)?diskless. The latter is works very differently than the former. Ignore the

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-19 Thread Chris Shenton
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Make sure your NFS server is exporting to your subnet and that it is running the necessary services, (portmap, mountd, nfsd -t -u -n 4). My boot server is 5.0, so that's the kernel my diskless box gets. My other boxes are 4.x boxes but

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-19 Thread Chris Shenton
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you sure you have done a recent buildworld/installworld? It sounds like you haven't. In -current kenv is in /bin (i.e. the source is in /usr/src/bin/kenv on -current) as of the 15th of this month. Well, I'll be danged. I

Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-18 Thread Chris Shenton
I was running a VIA Mini-ITX diskless box off a 4.7-STABLE box for a while using a root fs created by the clone_root discussed in the handbook, then some tweaks. I'm having a heck of a time trying to get this running under 5.0-RELEASE, now sync'd to 5.0-CURRENT as of yesterday, then

Re: Diskless: 5.0R scripts, boot, NFS mount problems I didn't have in 4.7S

2003-02-18 Thread Chris Shenton
Chris Shenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've moved the mount -a near the top of rc.d/diskless since it runs commands which are and not available until /usr is mounted (e.g., mtree). The NFS mount fails with a message I don't understand: [udp] pectopah.shenton.org:/usr: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC