Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Not all IDEs are so out of data. Netbeans is quite current (7.1). Eclipse is pretty close to the commonly available version as well. Have you tried building codelite from their sources? I may give it a try, just out of curiosity... From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de To: Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ports FreeBSD freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Sent: Sun, February 26, 2012 4:48:36 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I use both Netbeans (7.1 beta and 7.0.1) and Eclipse for Java development on FreeBSD 8.2. I haven't used either for doing development in other languages, but both work great for Java. I highly prefer Netbeans over Eclipse, but have to use Eclipse for some things. If you want to try Netbeans, I recommend using Open JDK 6. There is an issue with Netbeans and Open JDK 7 at the moment. I have an open bug report with Netbeans regarding this ( http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206882 ). In the bug report, I mention a work around to get Netbeans working with Open JDK 7... though I wouldn't necessarily recommend it. Dan. From: Martin Schütte li...@mschuette.name Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:45:42 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote: CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse. - -- Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9GQwQACgkQrb26LrIR2NknswCgx5t43H3L7Al+vfhwft4x9nZ+ 8YwAniyGl5I6MZ8nv7JlBoYovobyM4BH =UHFf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an editor with more general niftiness by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an IDE. Dan. From: Jan Mikkelsen j...@transactionware.com To: O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I don't disagree. I was disagreeing with the notion that Unix is an IDE. From: Quentin Schwerkolt develloper.u...@hotmail.fr To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 9:44:50 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile projects with clang is not a bad idea. On 02/23/12 15:38, Dan Daley wrote: The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an editor with more general niftiness by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an IDE. Dan. From: Jan Mikkelsenj...@transactionware.com To: O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Current FreeBSDfreebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
