Re: Sched_Ule
I ran with SCHED_ULE for a couple days recently and had trouble beyond just sluggishness. When doing really intensive tasks such as buildworld or installworld, the computer would actually stall. The first time was immediately after booting single user after building the world and kernel. I started and installworld, and it hung there until I did a hard reset. Horrible timing for it, but such is life. Later (after I fixed the damage from the partial install) it hung when doing my buildworld, so I booted up on a different (SCHED_4BSD) kernel to do the buildworld (subsequently switching back to SCHED_4BSD). If you want any particulars about my system just let me know. -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Scott Sipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sched_Ule Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Hi, I see some posts from late Sept about people having issues with SCHED_ULE. I just wanted to add in that I am having the exact same problems. In short: Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is very slow, feels 10x more sluggish than normal. (I'm running KDE if anyone is curious). I rebuilt my kernel today (running yesterday's world) with SCHED_4BSD instead, and things are much better. System is much much more responsive. If there's any tests I can run, or anyone I should talk to, I'd love to be of assistance, thanks much, Scott ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sched_Ule
Dual AMD Athlon MP 1900+s actually, on an Asus motherboard. -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sched_Ule Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:33:39 -0400 (EDT) On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Evan Dower wrote: I ran with SCHED_ULE for a couple days recently and had trouble beyond just sluggishness. When doing really intensive tasks such as buildworld or installworld, the computer would actually stall. The first time was immediately after booting single user after building the world and kernel. I started and installworld, and it hung there until I did a hard reset. Horrible timing for it, but such is life. Later (after I fixed the damage from the partial install) it hung when doing my buildworld, so I booted up on a different (SCHED_4BSD) kernel to do the buildworld (subsequently switching back to SCHED_4BSD). If you want any particulars about my system just let me know. Do you have P4's with hyper threading? -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Scott Sipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sched_Ule Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Hi, I see some posts from late Sept about people having issues with SCHED_ULE. I just wanted to add in that I am having the exact same problems. In short: Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is very slow, feels 10x more sluggish than normal. (I'm running KDE if anyone is curious). I rebuilt my kernel today (running yesterday's world) with SCHED_4BSD instead, and things are much better. System is much much more responsive. If there's any tests I can run, or anyone I should talk to, I'd love to be of assistance, thanks much, Scott ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer-- sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sched_Ule
How many of the people experiencing SCHED_ULE related problems (primarily lagging) are also using nvidia-driver? I know I am, and I'm pretty sure Arjan is. Could there be a connection? -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Arjan van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED],Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sched_Ule Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:36:48 +0200 On Thursday 09 October 2003 22:57, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/10/09 00:28), Scott Sipe wrote: Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is very slow, feels 10x more sluggish than normal. (I'm running KDE if anyone is curious). A number of us are seeing this problem, and not all of us are entry level end-users. I'm using a single PIII with 1GB of RAM and maxusers 0. No Hyper-threading, nothing interesting in the kernel (apart from I686_CPU only, KTRACE and _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING). The problem (as I recall) is that Jeff hasn't received reports from people who can dig into the problem and have the time to do so. For example, I'm pretty sure I could at least point a finger at the problem if I had time. But I'm under heavy pressure, and so the only solution that's feasible for me is to just switch to SCHED_4BSD and keep moving. What surprises me is that Jeff can't reproduce it. For me, the sluggish mouse problem manifests under these conditions: 1) Use a USB mouse, not a PS2 mouse. Is this _only_ with usb? Hi Jeff, I have the same problem, but with a PS2 mouse. I've never tried an USB mouse on this system. I've seen this behavior on at least 4 systems now myself, fast and slow systems (my own workstation is an Athlon XP 2000+, 512MB RAM). It must be possible for you to reproduce this behavior. I've seen the lagging mouse on many occasions, always when my system was under high load. It's very difficult to pinpoint though; for example, if I'm building a port, I only notice the lagging for small periods of time during the build (sometimes I don't see it for 5 minutes, then suddenly it lags for about 3 seconds). Most of the time, it doesn't even bother me. One of the places it _always_ happens, is when I log out of GNOME 2.4. The background fades to a darker color, and during the fade, I experience the mouse lag. Can you reproduce this? Maybe you have some hints for me, some things I can try to find out more about this problem? Arjan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sched_Ule
From: Jonathan E Fosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] I switched back to the XFree86 nv driver earlier today and still have trouble. moused is running and it is a PS/2 mouse. Is nvidia.ko still loaded in the kernel? -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D _ Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NVidia Port Problems with kernel
I suspect you (and many others) will find these pages useful: Current FreeBSD Problem Reports page http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi The problem you are having is listed here as ports/56157 and there are others relating to nvidia-driver as well (and many others related to other things). FreeBSD mailing list archive search page http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists The problem you are having has been discussed in other threads on at least -current and possibly other lists as well. -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Pau Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NVidia Port Problems with kernel Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:17:21 +0200 Hello! I'm a FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT user and I use NVidia card. While I'm building 'ports/x11/nvidia-driver' make return errors cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver;make #ERRORS /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-4365/src/nvidia_sysctl. c: In function `nvidia_find_bridge': /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-4365/src/nvidia_sysctl. c:234: error: `PCIR_HEADERTYPE' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-4365/src/nvidia_sysctl. c:234: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-4365/src/nvidia_sysctl. c:234: error: for each function it appears in.) You can see full output in attrached file 'make.out'. I know that in previous version of kernel it runs. If is error that I made answarme. thanks! make.out ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh CVSUP, new ATAng problems and nvidia.ko compile issues
I filed one yesterday: ports/56157 -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Arjan van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brendon and Wendy [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fresh CVSUP, new ATAng problems and nvidia.ko compile issues Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 16:54:58 +0200 On Saturday 30 August 2003 16:20, Brendon and Wendy wrote: All, A constant in one of the kernel header file seems to have been renamed. Change PCIR_HEADERTYPE to PCIR_HDRTYPE in the NVIDIA code and all will be well. I have tried this myself and all is well. Cheers, Brendon Can you submit a PR for the x11/nvidia-driver port? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get MSN 8 and enjoy automatic e-mail virus protection. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD / KDE locking up solid
You say you have a GeForce 4? Do you have nvidia-driver installed? Nvidia-driver makes my computer lock up like the dickens. ;-) -- Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Public key: http://students.washington.edu/evantd/pgp-pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = D321 FA24 4BDA F82D 53A9 5B27 7D15 5A4F 033F 887D From: Stone Gecko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD / KDE locking up solid Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:08:59 -0700 Does anyone have any problems with KDE 3.1.2 or 3.1.3 running under BSD 5.1 Release? My system randomly locks solid. No mouse/keyboard/ssh/telnet/sound Once it locks, the only thing i can do is a hard reboot. I went back to 4.8 and it worked fine with KDE 3.1.3. Is there any log files or programs that i can run to find out what is causing it. Any help would be appreciated. ps. its a AMD 1GHz Tbird on an MSI k7t 266 pro2 board with a GF4mx440 video ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: smp in 5.1
I've got a dual athlon 1900+ MP. I've run both 4.x and 5.x. On 5.x I've tried both schedulers (4BSD and ULE). I don't think I've ever had any crashes, except when I install nvidia-driver, and then it crashes all the time. Theoretically 5.x should be better for smp as much work has happened in terms of locking. I haven't done any benchmarks, but I wouldn't expect any dramatic improvement, as locking work in many subsystems is still incomplete. Many things still need GIANT. 5.x does have a bunch of other good stuff though, and going that route saves you from upgrading later through an even bigger version gap. That's my two sense, and if it sounds like I know what I'm talking about, it's pure coincidence ;-) Others: please correct me if I got anything really wrong (I tried to be vague enough to aviod that, but we'll see). ;-) Evan Dower From: Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: smp in 5.1 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:21 -0400 (EDT) I guess I'll chime in as well... I have a Dual Athlon 2000+ MP here and it's running like a charm with SCHED_4BSD. Andy Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, derwood wrote: I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with dual P-III 500's No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far. Darin - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM To: Andy Farkas Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eriq Lamar Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using mp's but not sure which version would be better. Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). Stick with 4.8. * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. Strange. ULE has worked fine on my UP system for several months and the SMP system I recently obtained from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE. Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with ULE on your system? -- Steve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1
I fear we may have gotten a bit off-topic. E From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1 Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 11:21:41 +0930 On Saturday, 2 August 2003 at 18:36:24 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: The information I gave him gets him to lines of source code, instead of just function names with strange hexadecimal numbers that resolve to instruction offsets that may be specific to his compile flags, date of checkout of the sources from CVS, etc.. The first step of the link above does the same thing. But it's only the first step. by eyeballing the lines of source code in question and understanding the code around it well enough that you can tell *how* a pointer there could be NULL. My instructions *get* him those lines of source. You obviously still haven't read the reference. Do that first, and come back when you have either understood things or are having difficulty understanding. But don't shoot off your mouth without knowing what's going on. I read the reference. How does it apply in cases like this one, where you don't have a vmcore file? You don't seem to have read the reference very well. It also asks for other supporting information. That's the most important thing at the moment. I know that because I've been there before, and I've looked at a number of these dumps: it's almost certainly related to something he's doing which is not normal. You don't know that, and that's excusable, but it's not excusable that after four or five requests, you still haven't RTFM'd. The way I would approach finding this, with only: 1) The line of code where the failure occurred 2) The stack traceback, with no arguments 3) The sources for the code in the stack traceback would be to eyeball the code in #1, and try to figure out how I gould get to that point with that pointer having a NULL value, given my apriori knowledge of the forward call graph. You have that? I would examine every intermediate conditional and function call that could effect the value of the pointer and cause it to be NULL at the point in question. Go for it. Once I get the log files, I'll start there. One of the details I wish you would check is whether or not he has a vmcore file, or the ability to get one... We'll address that issue when it becomes necessary. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers attach3 _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does linux-sun-jdk_1.4.2 work?
I have certainly had some frustration with Java on FreeBSD, but for the most part it works for me. In fact, I wrote a pure Java program that only seems to work on FreeBSD. On Windows, it crashes inside Java's regex code, so there's one place where FreeBSD works better ;-) Evan Dower From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) To: Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Does linux-sun-jdk_1.4.2 work? Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:29:57 +0200 Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps you should try working with Java 1.4.x on FreeBSD before you assume something about me that's highly inaccurate. I think you'll find very quickly that it doesn't work nicely unless the process is running as root. I use it daily and have never had any trouble (except for the broken Xalan in 1.4.1). DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.
I may be smoking crack, but isn't it: bit 5 = 0001 = 0x10 ? bit 6 = 0010 = 0x20 ? E From: Andrew Lankford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time. Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:40:21 -0600 Before anyone corrects me, yes, the man page says bit 5 controls polling, 0x20. My question stands. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Annoucning DragonFly BSD!
From: Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Periodicaly someone masquerades as Matt Dilllon. Those targeted by trolls need to work extra hard to establish credibility of poster's address, to avoid suspicion of troll at work (phone number maybe?). Trolls of course need to work extra hard too, to also convince us. Maybe this time the poster is the real Matthew Dillon, but I doubt it. Phone numbers are easily forged. If authenticity is in question, why not PGP sign it? E _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NVidia driver stability?
That may have done it. Now that I recompiled nvidia-driver only WITH_NVIDIA_HACKS, doing glxinfo several times no longer wreaks havoc. Since something seems to be screwy with my network driver (rtl8139) when the kernel is compiled without optimizations, I recompiled with them and so far all is well. At the moment, I have my AGP rate knocked down from 4x to 2x in BIOS. If all continues to go well, I'll bump it back up and report what I find. E From: Munish Chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2003-07-12 14:46 +, Evan Dower wrote: After following all the instructions at http://www.soulwax.net/nvidia/faq.shtml _very_ carefully and compiling nvidia-driver WITH_FREEBSD_AGP, WITH_NVIDIA_HACKS, and with FORCE_AGP_RATE, my system was dramatically slower and substantially _less_ stable. (I had to switch to another computer to write this email). Interestingly, whenever I compile the kernel without optimizations, network activity becomes _very_ slow. E aka Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington Did you try using the NVIDIA AGP interface? The majority of mail I get indicates that the NVIDIA AGP stuff works better than the FreeBSD one. I'm not sure about your network problems, perhaps you should look at the driver for clues. -- Munish Chopra ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NVidia driver stability?
After following all the instructions at http://www.soulwax.net/nvidia/faq.shtml _very_ carefully and compiling nvidia-driver WITH_FREEBSD_AGP, WITH_NVIDIA_HACKS, and with FORCE_AGP_RATE, my system was dramatically slower and substantially _less_ stable. (I had to switch to another computer to write this email). Interestingly, whenever I compile the kernel without optimizations, network activity becomes _very_ slow. E aka Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington From: Will Saxon [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just installed these drivers on my machine, which uses a Geforce4 Ti4200. I had 10 glxgears processes running in the background and was running glxinfo over and over, and while the glxgears processes were not really spinning very fast nothing crashed or anything like that. Machine is running a June 27 -current with Xfree86 4.3.0. I compiled the nvidia-driver port with -DWITH_FREEBSD_AGP and -DWITH_NVIDIA_HACKS. -Will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*
I am highly interested in getting nvidia-driver to work well for FBSD, and in particular my own computer. I do not have the expertise to hack on either it or the kernel (yet), but I am eager to provide debugging information. nvidia-driver frequently crashes my machine, so I expect that my input could be valuable. Is anybody interested in my assistance? Is anybody actively working on/with/around the nvidia-driver, or does the license make that infeasible? Thanks a bundle, Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*
I was afraid that might be the case :-( From: Munish Chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2003-06-12 11:51 +, Evan Dower wrote: I am highly interested in getting nvidia-driver to work well for FBSD, and in particular my own computer. I do not have the expertise to hack on either it or the kernel (yet), but I am eager to provide debugging information. nvidia-driver frequently crashes my machine, so I expect that my input could be valuable. Is anybody interested in my assistance? Is anybody actively working on/with/around the nvidia-driver, or does the license make that infeasible? Thanks a bundle, Evan Dower Undergraduate, Computer Science University of Washington NVIDIA is handling everything to do with the driver. Expect a new release shortly *cough*. Until then, perhaps some of the information in the FAQ will help you: http://www.soulwax.net/nvidia/faq.shtml Good luck. -- Munish Chopra ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mozilla and mozilla-devel crash constantly withyesterday'ssources.
Happens to me too with mozilla and galeon. Didn't happen until very recently. Maybe came with upgrade from p6 to p7? $ uname -a FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.0-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 #0: Tue Apr 1 18:34:29 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla and mozilla-devel crash constantly with yesterday'ssources. Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 64.173.182.155 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by mc10-f6.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:36:16 -0700 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid B7EAF57AB8; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 9C8E037B404; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA5337B401for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from insourcery.net (ns1.insourcery.net [198.93.171.6])by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ECF43F75for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by insourcery.net with local; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:30 -0700 Received: from adsl-64-173-182-155.dsl.mtry01.pacbell.net(adsl-64-173-182-155.dsl.mtry01.pacbell.net [64.173.182.155]) bymail.encontacto.net (Horde) with HTTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED];Sat, 12 Apr 2003 05:35:30 -0700 X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 (Normal) User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-currentfreebsd-current.freebsd.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2003 12:36:17.0079 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CBCC470:01C300F0] My Mozilla and mozilla-devel are both crashing for no aparent reason and without dumping core since making world yesterday. I'm using versions mozilla-1.3,2 and mozilla-1.4a,1 although it doesn't seem to be a mozilla problem. Until yesterday, I was happily using only mozilla-devel. When the problem began yesterday morning, after make world, I compiled the mozilla release and it did the same. I happened to have opera-6.12.20030305 installed on the same laptop and it works fine not that that means anything :-). I have nothing really tangible as to the cause. It is really strange. Is anyone else seeing this or have an idea as to what I could have done to cause this to happen from one day to the next? Thanks, ed # uname -a FreeBSD worldinternet.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Fri Apr 11 07:17:54 PDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850 i386 Compaq Presario 1700 -- - ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sendmail: no local mailer
Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by default) and it's output. # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost 451 4.0.0 No local mailer defined: Bad address 554 5.0.0 QueueDirectory (Q) option must be set The same thing happens if I change localhost to 127.0.0.1. I suspect that the second error (554) will disappear when I get rid of the first one (451). Does anyone know why it might be misbehaving like this? Thanks, Evan Dower P.S.: relevent info to follow: # uname -a FreeBSD lojak.washington.edu 5.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p6 #0: Wed Mar 26 10:29:59 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail: no local mailer
Hurray! With the addition of a make install, that worked wonderfully. I have no idea what was wrong with my sendmail.cf but at least now I can read the output from periodic. Thanks a lot, Evan Dower From: Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sendmail: no local mailer Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net ([64.105.95.154]) by mc4-f22.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:14 -0800 Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.13.0.PreAlpha1/8.13.0.PreAlpha1) with ESMTP id h32GbD5k025227(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.13.0.PreAlpha1/8.12.7/Submit) id h32GbDUx025224;Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:13 -0800 (PST) X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2003 16:37:15.0054 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E3B2CE0:01C2F936] evantd Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I evantd can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I evantd upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by evantd default) and it's output. evantd # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost evantd 451 4.0.0 No local mailer defined: Bad address evantd 554 5.0.0 QueueDirectory (Q) option must be set /etc/mail/sendmail.cf is a bogus (empty?) file. One way to fix this is: cd /etc/mail mv sendmail.cf sendmail.cf~bogus make make restart _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail: no local mailer
I agree. In fact, it was. I only posted to -current after receiving no response for a few days (since I suspected that it might have been related to my upgrade to 5.0). I personally have never messed with sendmail's configuration because on my system it functions only as a local mailer. I guess that may be one reason for proposing that sendmail be moved out of the base system. It has all the power (and the complexity that comes with that power) of a full-featured mailer, yet most machines are not mail servers. Well, anyway, there's my two cents. Evan Dower From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sendmail: no local mailer Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:59:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.188]) by mc10-f32.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:00:48 -0800 Received: from pool0303.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.48] helo=mindspring.com)by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)(Exim 3.33 #1)id 190qHl-0001xF-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:00:45 -0800 X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4de10f470e868703b4fc515dddff6e594350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2003 22:00:48.0845 (UTC) FILETIME=[51C097D0:01C2F963] Note: This should have been posted to -questions, not -current. Evan Dower wrote: Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by default) and it's output. # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost 451 4.0.0 No local mailer defined: Bad address You are missing a local mailer. A local mailer is defined by a line similar to: Mlocal, P=/usr/libexec/mail.local, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qPSXfmnz9, S=EnvFromSMT P/HdrFromL, R=EnvToL/HdrToL, T=DNS/RFC822/SMTP, A=mail.local -l in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf. Probably, you updated and failed to rebuild and install the sendmail configuration files located in /etc/mail/. 554 5.0.0 QueueDirectory (Q) option must be set You are missing a line similar to: # queue directory O QueueDirectory=/var/spool/mqueue in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf. Probably this has the same root cause. The same thing happens if I change localhost to 127.0.0.1. I suspect that the second error (554) will disappear when I get rid of the first one (451). Does anyone know why it might be misbehaving like this? Pilot error. -- Terry _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RELENG_5_0 v. HEAD
Perhaps I should choose my words more wisely. The ports system will allow you to build it (nvidia-driver) on a recent HEAD, but not on RELENG_5_0. I assume that this is because some change was made that increased its stability. I had it installed anyway, for a while, but in the end chose stability over tuxracer ;-). Maybe now I can have both. I would guess that stability and performance have both increased in a number of areas since 5.0 was released. As a user of an SMP system, that may affect me more than the average user, but as the owner of a lowly workstation (as opposed to a server), maybe it wouldn't be so noticeable. Of course, it has only been about two and a half months, but I get the impression that perhaps it has come along way in that short time. I guess my question, if it can be boiled down into a single question, is Is HEAD _usually_ faster and more stable than RELENG_5_0? Thanks again, Evan Dower, a recently admitted CS major at the University of Washington who would love for some nice FreeBSD developer to take him under their wing and gently introduce him to the world of FreeBSD development (instead of being an idle spectator) From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RELENG_5_0 v. HEAD Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:29:06 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org ([63.207.60.150]) by mc4-f23.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:29:07 -0800 Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 3890666CFA; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)id 211B012AA; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:29:06 -0800 (PST) X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2003 18:29:07.0789 (UTC) FILETIME=[94EB7FD0:01C2F87C] On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:42:25AM -0800, Evan Dower wrote: I've been tracking RELENG_5_0 pretty much since it existed, but I am wondering now if it would be better to track -CURRENT via HEAD instead. After all, with the semi-frozen status of HEAD, all knew commits should be fairly conservative and the _general_ _ trend_ should at least be toward a more stable product. I wonder if HEAD is actually a more stable product than RELENG_5_0. Sometimes is, sometimes isn't. You have to be fairly careful to upgrade at the right time based on commit activity and mailing list traffic. Certainly it would be for anyone using the nvidia-driver, since it is unsupported on RELENG_5_0. What are your thoughts? It's just as unsupported on HEAD. Kris attach3 _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.0 i386 Live Filesystem
I recently was installing the world when it ran out of space. I ^C'ed too many times and ended up with trying to start up on an incomplete world, really incomplete. I don't have /bin/sh, for example. Can someone point me toward an i386 Live Filesystem ISO so I can try to fix my mess? Thanks a lot, Evan Dower (and his fubar computer) _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: 5.0 i386 Live Filesystem
Oh, I didn't realize. Fantastic. Thanks a lot. :-) From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 5.0 i386 Live Filesystem Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:18 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.47]) by mc7-s6.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:35 -0800 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:33 -0800 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 0FDA755760; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:23 -0800 (PST)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538)id BA1C137B405; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTPid 9AC562E800A; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5804837B401for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-205.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.205])by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBD343F43for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:19 -0800 (PST)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 403A867892; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)id 1B8171719; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:57:18 -0800 (PST) X-Message-Info: dHZMQeBBv44lPE7o4B5bAg== Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-ID: freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG List-Archive: http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/ (Web Archive) List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2003 23:57:34.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC6478C0:01C2C65F] On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:50:40PM -0800, Evan Dower wrote: I recently was installing the world when it ran out of space. I ^C'ed too many times and ended up with trying to start up on an incomplete world, really incomplete. I don't have /bin/sh, for example. Can someone point me toward an i386 Live Filesystem ISO so I can try to fix my mess? Thanks a lot, Evan Dower (and his fubar computer) That's what the disc 2 iso is on the FTP sites. Kris attach3 _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0
I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld-elf. One error and a whole lot of warnings. I don't know where I should start as I'm new to current (even though it's technically not -current). I swear I followed the instructions in UPGRADING. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Info follows. Let me know if you need to know more. Thanks a lot, Evan Dower $ uname -a FreeBSD lojak.u.washington.edu 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 21 21:58:07 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 # script /root/buildworld.out env -i make buildworld -- snip ( the whole file can be found at http://students.washington.edu/evantd/buildworld.out -- === libexec/rtld-elf cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386 -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf -elf -fpic -DPIC -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -c /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386/rtld_start.S cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386 -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf -elf -fpic -DPIC -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -c /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c: In function `find_symdef': /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:2035: syntax error at end of input cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:838: warning: unused variable `hash' /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:835: warning: unused variable `def' /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:83: warning: `gethints' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:84: warning: `init_dag' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:85: warning: `init_dag1' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:86: warning: `init_rtld' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:87: warning: `initlist_add_neededs' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:89: warning: `initlist_add_objects' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:90: warning: `is_exported' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:91: warning: `linkmap_add' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:92: warning: `linkmap_delete' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:93: warning: `load_needed_objects' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:94: warning: `load_preload_objects' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:95: warning: `load_object' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:96: warning: `lock_check' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:97: warning: `obj_from_addr' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:98: warning: `objlist_call_fini' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:99: warning: `objlist_call_init' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:100: warning: `objlist_clear' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:101: warning: `objlist_find' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:102: warning: `objlist_init' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:103: warning: `objlist_push_head' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:104: warning: `objlist_push_tail' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:105: warning: `objlist_remove' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:106: warning: `objlist_remove_unref' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:107: warning: `relocate_objects' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:108: warning: `rtld_exit' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:109: warning: `search_library_path' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:110: warning: `get_program_var_addr' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:111: warning: `set_program_var' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:113: warning: `symlook_default' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:115: warning: `symlook_list' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:116: warning: `trace_loaded_objects' used but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:117: warning: `unload_object' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c:118: warning: `unref_dag' declared `static' but never defined *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Script done on Wed Jan 22 21:02:45 2003 _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0
An update: CVSup'ing didn't fix the problem, but when I deleted the rtld.c and mv'd /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hide, it stopped at /usr/src/contrib/amd/amd/srvr_nfs.c. So, I deleted that file, CVSup'd, and built again, and everything built fine. Very strange... cvsweb doesn't show any recent changes to either file. Any ideas on what was going on? Thanks again, Evan Dower From: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:17:14 -0800 I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld-elf. One error and a whole lot of warnings. I don't know where I should start as I'm new to current (even though it's technically not -current). I swear I followed the instructions in UPGRADING. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Info follows. Let me know if you need to know more. Thanks a lot, Evan Dower $ uname -a FreeBSD lojak.u.washington.edu 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 21 21:58:07 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 # script /root/buildworld.out env -i make buildworld -- snip ( the whole file can be found at http://students.washington.edu/evantd/buildworld.out -- _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
