Re: panic: pmap_remove_all: illegal for unmanaged/fake page 0x9d2000

2003-10-02 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Thursday 02 October 2003 14:54, Chris Jackman wrote: Sun E250, running world/kernel from September 18th. While running a make buildworld, I get : panic: pmap_remove_all: illegal for unmanaged/fake page 0x9d2000 Update and build a new kernel. This has been fixed. Jake

Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasingrules

2003-07-28 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:59:00AM +0200, Thomas Moestl said words to the effect of; On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: Is this caused by -oS option? - in making BOOTMFS in make release cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls

Re: Floppyless release build of sparc64

2003-07-23 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:16:43AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov said words to the effect of; A similar change would be in order for sparc64. Patch is attached, please review. The net effect is that we save huge CPU times in release.9 and do not create the useless boot.flp

PAE and large ram support.

2003-04-09 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hi, If you haven't read on cvs-src, just recently I've committed support for PAE and more than 4G of ram on x86 to -current. Basically what this does is allows physical memory above 4G to be used normally by the kernel and userland. Except in certain circumstances no distinction is made between

Re: Updated if_* attach/detach patches

2003-03-19 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:37:43AM -0800, Nate Lawson said words to the effect of; I have updated my patches for: dc pcn rl sf sis sk ste ti tl vr wb xl They have been compile tested but I only have an rl card so I'd appreciate feedback. Patches are at:

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Maxime Henrion said words to the effect of; Morten Rodal wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@ SLIST_FOREACH(at, sc-alloc_list, list) {

Re: question on profiling code

2003-02-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
Can you explain how fuswintr() and suswintr() work on sparc64's? They seem to cause traps if the user counter is not mapped, and I can't see where the traps are handled. ia64/trap.c has a comment about where these traps are handled, but has dummies for fuswintr() and suswintr() so the

Re: question on profiling code

2003-02-16 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:35:09PM +1100, Bruce Evans said words to the effect of; On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: In addupc_intr, if the increment cannot be done immediatly, the addres to increment the count for is stored and the increment is done later at

Re: What is the difference between p_ucred and td_ucred?

2003-02-03 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:08:41AM -0500, Ilmar S. Habibulin said words to the effect of; Why not to use only credits for proc and make td_ucred macro like td_proc-p_ucred? Or it has some meaning that i do not understand? td_ucred is a read only reference to p_ucred, so

Re: vm panic

2003-01-22 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:45:13AM +0800, David Xu said words to the effect of; panic: lockmgr: locking against myself Debugger(panic) Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 dbtrace Debugger(c0381630,c03e4ee0,c037fd14,da447c28,1) at Debugger+0x54

Re: fpsetmask on sparc64

2003-01-12 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:25:20AM -0800, Terry Lambert said words to the effect of; Jake Burkholder wrote: Is this an omission, or are the ports wrong? FWIW, the alpha headers are basically identical to the sparc64 ones. There may be missing ifdefs in the ports

Re: fpsetmask on sparc64

2003-01-12 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:09:37AM -0800, Terry Lambert said words to the effect of; Jake Burkholder wrote: Isn't that really a lame excuse? Shouldn't #ifdef __FreeBSD__ be enough to make code compile on all FreeBSD platforms? I don't know, why

Re: fpsetmask on sparc64

2003-01-11 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 07:16:26PM -0800, Kris Kennaway said words to the effect of; fpsetmask is not defined in floatingpoint.h or machine/floatingpoint.h on sparc64 (it is on i386): /usr/include/machine/floatingpoint.h:#definefpsetmask(m)((fp_except_t) \

Re: Superblock layout hosed on LP64 systems [was: Re: HEADS UP: VFS changes breaks GPT]

2003-01-09 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:29:43PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar said words to the effect of; On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:12:30AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: GPT based systems are unable to mount the root file system. I haven't had the time to dig into this, but we must be

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:25:12PM +, Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of; Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-19 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:26:36AM +, Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of; -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Re: UMA panic under load

2002-12-14 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 07:37:31PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman said words to the effect of; John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12-Dec-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote: I got this on an alpha tonight. It was under heavy load at the time (18 simultaneous package builds

Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of; There I go reply to all... sigh IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy here.

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-11-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:23:20PM -0800, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: -- Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Nov 17 20:01:33 GMT 2002

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:21:42PM +0600, Max Khon said words to the effect of; hi, there! On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:18:23AM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote: Before someone says you can dlopen() from static binaries in order to implement nsswitch, please provide

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Jake Burkholder
You've basically hacked rtld to bits. All the ifdefs make it hard to read and maintain. There number of #ifdef's is not large (for me) to make rtld unmaintainable. If this is inappropriate for you there are two obvious ways to solve it: - refactor rtld-elf and move common parts of libdl

Re: libc size

2002-11-04 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:54:54PM +0600, Max Khon said words to the effect of; hi, there! On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:57:35PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: another 2.4M for /rescue. That makes it less impressive. I don't find the duplication appealing, either.

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-29 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:55:03AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of; David O'Brien writes: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD, IIRC a 500mhz

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:19:09PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of; Mike Barcroft writes: stage 4: building everything.. -- === usr.sbin/pkg_install/info cc1: warnings being treated

Re: [Ugly PATCH] Again: panic kmem_malloc()

2002-10-18 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:19:57AM +0200, Ben Stuyts said words to the effect of; Terry, At 23:07 18/10/2002, you wrote: Ben Stuyts wrote: Furthermore, this might be interesting: the last vmstat -m log before the panic. Maybe someone can check if these values are

Re: Longer term fix for sigreturn ABI breaking

2002-10-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:12:02AM -0400, Daniel Eischen said words to the effect of; On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: Daniel Eischen wrote: At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t was

Re: lightweight interrupt threads

2002-09-30 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:46:50AM -0400, Robert Watson said words to the effect of; Dunno who it was, but my understanding is that we already actually use lightweight interrupt threads on sparc64, so you might want to peruse there and look at the approach taken. :-) You

Re: aout support broken in gcc3

2002-09-02 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000, Bruce Evans said words to the effect of; aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at least compile-time Which boot blocks? assignments to long longs and

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-09-02 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:21:12PM -0700, Peter Wemm said words to the effect of; Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: === gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus method.o: In function `use_thunk':

Re: Wierd routing Problems

2002-08-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:02:28AM +0200, Sten said words to the effect of; I am currently running Current on an u60 and it seems to be running quite nicely minus some gotchas and not yet working ports. Thanks for the hard work. I do however have one pretty strange

Re: i386 trap code

2002-07-05 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 05:43:26PM -0700, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; Looking at i386/exception.s one sees: [...] Now: would it not make a lot of sense to put doreti immediatly after calltrap: in the same file so that one could follow the

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-31 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:56:30PM -0700, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; + /* Note: use of M_WAITOK means it won't fail. */ + newkse-ke_pcb = + (((struct md_store *)(newkse-ke_mdstorage))-mds_pcb); + newkse-ke_frame = + (((struct md_store

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-31 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:45:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote: [aweful stuff] (always did dislike sparc) Whatever. It's the most fun architecture I've found to program for. jake.. can you show

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-31 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:49:59PM -0700, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; interesting but not exactly brief.. :-) On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote: The system call stubs in libc are leaf functions; basically just a trap instruction

Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again

2002-05-30 Thread Jake Burkholder
apparently, On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:20:57AM -0700, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; ok, but does anyone other than john (who has commented) have any comments about the logic and work in the change? I'm working on his comments but comments by others would sure be

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

2002-05-04 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:44:44AM +1000, Bruce Evans said words to the effect of; On Sat, 4 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: Try disabling -pipe when building the compiler. This seems to make things more

Re: comparing executables

2002-04-03 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:01:36PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp said words to the effect of; In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju lian Elischer writes: On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: How can I find out which binaries have changed? they are all different

Re: -current lock warning...

2002-03-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:17:22AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein said words to the effect of; * Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 09:08] wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 06:36] wrote: PS. I

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem

2002-03-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:23:01AM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; :I agree that the use of cpu_critical_enter/exit could use cleaning up. :Can you give an example of where critical_enter is used improperly? :You mean in fork_exit? Your changes to

Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( 1 week Feature Slush )

2002-03-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:33:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn said words to the effect of; On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: As discussed at BSDCon, the release engineers are committed to releasing a relatively stable snapshot of FreeBSD -CURRENT on or

Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( 1 week Feature Slush )

2002-03-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:12:47PM -0800, Terry Lambert said words to the effect of; Jake Burkholder wrote: Will this release include some kind of bootable-install support for any new hardware platforms, such as sparc64? (this snapshot is meant to be available

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem

2002-03-07 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:21:21PM -0500, Robert Watson said words to the effect of; On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : : : On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: : : Then do the right

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem

2002-03-07 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:04:49PM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; :Yes. What I would like and what I mentioned before is for this to be :hidden behind cpu_critical_enter/exit. Specifically, cpu_critical_enter :would be a null macro for i386, which

Re: First (easy) td_ucred patch

2002-02-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:21:24AM -0800, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/ucred.patch the structural rewriting in kern_proc.c should be done as a separate commit.

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assembly revamp, please review!

2002-02-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:12:22AM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; NOTES: I would like to thank Bruce for supplying the sample code that allowed me to do this in a day instead of several days. * debug.critical_mode sysctl. This will not

Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assembly revamp, please review!

2002-02-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:03:53PM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; :... :interrupts; hard interrupts are rarely masked. The queueing is written :in assmebler and runs outside of the kernel so it is fast. Traps in :general are fast because they don't

Re: First (easy) td_ucred patch

2002-02-23 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 11:38:07PM -0500, John Baldwin said words to the effect of; I'm currently testing the following patch whcih is a subset of the td_ucred changes. It involves no API changes, but only contains 2 basic changes: 1) We still need Giant when doing the

Re: malloc_bucket() idea (was Re: How to fix malloc.)

2002-02-23 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 02:43:35PM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; This is approximately what I am thinking. Note that this gives us the flexibility to create a larger infrastructure around the bucket cache, such as implement per-cpu caches

Re: changes to rc.diskless*

2002-02-22 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:00:51PM -0800, David O'Brien said words to the effect of; The existing very bazaar and local policy in rc.diskless1 is Just Wrong; and looks like no other Unix diskless configuration I've ever seen. I plan on committing this patch to negate

Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance

2002-02-18 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; :I request that you give say a 3 day review period for this. :I know JHB still has limited email access (no DSL yet). :This may be something he should review. I second this request.

Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance

2002-02-18 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:43:18PM -0800, Matthew Dillon said words to the effect of; :What John's patch does is spin while the lock owner is running on another cpu. :Spinning while there are no other processes on the run queues as well makes sense :but you'll also be

Re: Non 386 testers REALLY NEEDED

2002-02-11 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:17:38PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of; Andrew Gallatin writes: Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, this looks suspicious in locore.s: /* * Switch to proc0's PCB. */

Re: Non 386 testers REALLY NEEDED

2002-02-11 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:01:44PM -0800, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; for the set of patches at: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some slight re-aranging of stuff in the kernel. THe aim

Re: Non 386 testers REALLY NEEDED

2002-02-06 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:17:38PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of; Andrew Gallatin writes: Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, this looks suspicious in locore.s: /* * Switch to proc0's PCB. */

Re: vm_zeropage priority problems.

2001-12-22 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:48:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans said words to the effect of; On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Don't know how interesting this can be, but i am writing (no plans to commit it, unless people find it interesting) some code to implement a

Re: {id,rt}prio broken (at syscall level?)

2001-04-29 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hi, -current from yesterday: ---snip--- (45) root@ttyp0 # idprio 31 /bin/sleep 10 idprio: idprio: Invalid argument (46) root@ttyp0 # rtprio 31 /bin/sleep 10 rtprio: rtprio: Invalid argument ---snip--- isdnd is also affected (if you use its rtprio keyword in isdnd.rc). Thanks,

Re: Interesting backtrace...

2001-03-19 Thread Jake Burkholder
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: K6-2's aren't really i586's and i586_bzero should never be used for them (generic bzero is faster), Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly: Wrong yourself. The fpu

Re: random as module needs work

2001-03-13 Thread Jake Burkholder
I built a kernel without the random device and tried to use the module. I loaded it from the bootloader and the machine panic'ed on boot: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0a da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: SEAGATE ST39140W 1498 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 40.000MB/s

Re: Scheduler panic

2001-03-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:29:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: This is on a UP system. Had another one of these, under the same conditions. Both times I was running more(1) on a stdin stream which was generated by a "find | grep | more" operation, and I suspended the process with

Re: Scheduler panic

2001-03-01 Thread Jake Burkholder
replying to myself again This is the best workaround I can think of: Index: kern/kern_intr.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c,v retrieving revision 1.47 diff -u -r1.47 kern_intr.c --- kern/kern_intr.c

Re: d.net client + today's kernel

2001-02-28 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Jake Burkholder wrote: a distributed.net client (ports/misc/dnetc) being run on -current with today's kernel just hangs my box. the system _dramatically_ slows down and stops to respond on any external events (keyboard, network, etc). Sorry, this should

Re: d.net client + today's kernel

2001-02-27 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hello, a distributed.net client (ports/misc/dnetc) being run on -current with today's kernel just hangs my box. the system _dramatically_ slows down and stops to respond on any external events (keyboard, network, etc). d.net client is a daemon, that uses cpu idle (and only idle) time to

Re: Scheduler panic

2001-02-26 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:29:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: This is on a UP system. Had another one of these, under the same conditions. Both times I was running more(1) on a stdin stream which was generated by a "find | grep | more" operation, and I suspended the process with ^Z,

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c

2001-02-26 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2001/02/26 15:27:35 PST Modified files: sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c Log: Initialize native priority to PRI_MAX. It was usually 0 which made a process's priority go through the roof when it released a (contested) mutex. Only set

Re: Panic in today current

2001-02-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Julian Elischer wrote: Pete Carah wrote: I got a panic today on a fresh kernel... Compiled with netgraph but non of the netgraph modules. Immediately after the memory probe, a message about sequencers 0-15, then: Panic: spinlock ng_worklist not in order list The

Re: kernel threading: the first steps [patch]

2001-02-12 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:27:04AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: This is the single most flagrant lack of cooperation I have experienced while working with the FreeBSD Project. I'm truly dumbfounded. It's not a lack of co-operation.. it's a lack of communication. I didn't see an

HEADS UP Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdSchedule.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c swtch.s trap.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 trap.c src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_condvar.c kern_idle.c kern_intr.c kern_mib.c kern_mutex.c kern_proc.c ...

2001-02-11 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2001/02/11 16:20:08 PST Modified files: sys/alpha/alpha trap.c sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdSchedule.c sys/i386/i386genassym.c swtch.s trap.c sys/ia64/ia64trap.c sys/kern init_main.c kern_condvar.c kern_idle.c

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
Should it become: #ifdef SMP mtx_lock_spin(sched_lock); need_resched(); forward_roundrobin(); mtx_unlock_spin(sched_lock); #else ? I cannot test it yet, need to reanimate my testbox first. You need to handle the UP case as well :) Also, I don't think

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2001/02/10 11:07:32 PST Modified files: sys/kern kern_synch.c Log: Acquire sched_lock around need_resched() in roundrobin() to satisfy assertions that it is held. Since roundrobin() is a timeout there's no possible way that it could be called with

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/i386/i386 trap.c

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2001/02/10 12:33:35 PST Modified files: sys/alpha/alpha trap.c sys/i386/i386trap.c Log: Clear the reschedule flag after finding it set in userret(). This used to be in cpu_switch(), but I don't see any difference between doing it here.

Re: Kernel Panic from Yesterday's CVSup

2001-02-07 Thread Jake Burkholder
Running a kernel I got with this: cvs co -D"2001-01-30" src/sys /ithread.c/1.10/Mon Dec 4 21:15:14 2000//D2001.01.29.23.00.00 I get: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) in interrupt context Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x45: pushl %ebx db trace Debugger(c02119a3) at

Re: Kernel Panic from Yesterday's CVSup

2001-02-07 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 02:20:43PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Feb-01 Andrea Campi wrote: Running a kernel I got with this: cvs co -D"2001-01-30" src/sys /ithread.c/1.10/Mon Dec 4 21:15:14 2000//D2001.01.29.23.00.00 I get: panic: malloc(M_WAITOK)

Re: Wierd behaviour [UPDATE]

2001-02-02 Thread Jake Burkholder
Update to my previous mail: trying a PRE_SMPNG kernel doesn't change anything, it still displays nothing. I've also updated my /boot/loader and bootblocks. Still no idea? Are you running a stripped down kernel? or generic? There's a problem with kernels that are too large not booting.

Re: new gensetdefs breaks booting

2001-01-28 Thread Jake Burkholder
Bruce Evans wrote: The new gensetdefs gives unbootable kernels on i386's. They hang before printing anything. I verified that the output of gensetdefs.pl is identical to that of gensetdefs(1). Does the kernel boot if gensetdefs(1) is used? Its not identical here, gensetdefs.pl

Heads Up Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include globals.h src/sys/conf files.i386 src/sys/i386/i386 locore.s globals.s src/sys/i386/include asnames.h globals.h src/sys/ia64/include globals.h

2001-01-11 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2001/01/11 06:46:26 PST Modified files: sys/alpha/includeglobals.h sys/conf files.i386 sys/i386/i386locore.s sys/i386/include asnames.h globals.h sys/ia64/include globals.h Removed files: sys/i386/i386

Re: sys/mutex.h - compilation errors

2000-12-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
I cvsuped src , built world and tried to compile a new kernel. Presently compilation fails with error in ASM line 601 in ../../sys/mutex.h. Any ideas? (that code seems to be used by i4b sppp routines) This should be fixed, or at least worked around for a while. Re-cvsup and try again.

Re: sys/mutex.h - compilation errors

2000-12-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 03:37:46AM -0800, Jake Burkholder wrote: I cvsuped src , built world and tried to compile a new kernel. Presently compilation fails with error in ASM line 601 in ../../sys/mutex.h. Any ideas? (that code seems to be used by i4b sppp routines

heads up: sizeof proc changed

2000-11-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
As usual, you'll have to recompile all libkvm using programs. Jake To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: kernel build error due to dependency on /usr/include?

2000-05-27 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hi all, I got following kernel build error. When I run 'make includes', the error has gone away. Why does kernel build process depend on installed system files, such as /usr/include? It shouldn't. This seems to be primarily aic7xxx, although judging from the output of 'find

Re: HEADS UP Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh/pam_ssh pam_ssh.c src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb freebsd-uthread.c src/include mpool.h src/lib/libc/net name6.c src/lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h uthread_file.c src/lib/libncp ncpl_rcfile.c src/lib/libstand if_ether.h ...

2000-05-26 Thread Jake Burkholder
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith writes: I objected to a recent commit hiding the fact that this is "(elm)-field.sle_next". Anyway, curelm must be a pointer to a struct. Not just any struct; the struct must contain a "field" declared using SLIST_ENTRY(). It could be an

Re: HEADS UP Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh/pam_ssh pam_ssh.c src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb freebsd-uthread.c src/include mp

2000-05-24 Thread Jake Burkholder
Garrett Wollman writes: I've just built a fresh world here; if you use the cvs-crypto from internat, it may be broken. I submitted a patch to Mark Murray which should fix it, here it is again just in case: I still think (and am going on record) that this is a REALLY, REALLY

HEADS UP Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh/pam_ssh pam_ssh.c src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb freebsd-uthread.c src/include mpool.h src/lib/libc/net name6.c src/lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h uthread_file.c src/lib/libncp ncpl_rcfile.c src/lib/libstand if_ether.h ...

2000-05-23 Thread Jake Burkholder
jake2000/05/23 13:41:02 PDT Log: Change the way that the queue(3) structures are declared; don't assume that the type argument to *_HEAD and *_ENTRY is a struct. Suggested by: phk Reviewed by:phk Approved by:mdodd HEADS UP Possible action

Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility

2000-04-27 Thread Jake Burkholder
...snip... Its nice to see someone actually using kobj so soon. There is a possible performance problem though - kobj method calls are roughly 20% slower than direct function calls. Having said that, this isn't that slow - I timed a method call to a two argument function at ~40ns on a

Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility

2000-04-25 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Boris Popov wrote: simple_lock* functions has breakage too. They defined as macros for non-SMP case and as functions for SMP. This currently apparently affects the following modules: ccd cd9660 msdosfs nfs ntfs nwfs vinum

Re: sshd in current....no config files in /etc/ssh

2000-03-07 Thread Jake Burkholder
ThanksI used that "i" option and it worked...well, almost. I have the files I need in /etc/ssh but when I start sshd I get this now. error: Could not load host key: /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key: No such file or directory If you want to track current you must use mergemaster. This is

Re: 4.0-RC Broken driver?: matcd

2000-02-14 Thread Jake Burkholder
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 02:39:09PM -0700, Doug Russell wrote: Does anyone have a Panasonic 526/563 CD-ROM drive working under 4.0-C? I have not had one working for may weeks, however, I wasn't sure if it was a hardware problem here, or something. 3.4 still finds them, so I beleive it

Re: sb16 not found with newpcm

1999-09-08 Thread Jake Burkholder
pcm0: SoundBlaster 16 4.11 at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 on isa0 If dmesg from sb0 would help I could get it.. Anything else I could help with in making "device pcm0" work without params? or is that pnp only? Yes, that is for pnp-only. -- we are but packets in the internet

mii_load in loader.conf

1999-09-06 Thread Jake Burkholder
Can we have an entry for mii.ko in /boot/defaults/loader.conf? ## ### Networking drivers # ## mii_load="NO" ax_load="NO"#

java too? (was Re: Perl still broken in 4.0-CURRENT)

1999-09-05 Thread Jake Burkholder
I found the problem and the fix for the perl breakage that was caused by my recent changes to the dynamic linker. I'm doing a make world now, just to make sure I haven't broken something new. I'll commit the fix later this evening, unless the make world reveals new problems. (I don't

newpcm and sb driver

1999-09-05 Thread Jake Burkholder
Regarding all the trouble people have been having getting their cards detected with newpcm, I had to make a change to my kernel config for it to find my soundblaster 16, non-pnp. this does not detect my card: device pcm0 at isa? port ? irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 this does: device pcm0 at

Re: a couple of warnings

1999-08-14 Thread Jake Burkholder
asus p2b-ds, dual P2/350s, 128mb current as of 99.08.13 evening dmesg has a few things which worry me. but the hauppauge/brootree works fine with mbone tools and fxtv. WARNING: "bktr" is usurping "bktr"'s cdevsw[]* WARNING: "iic" is usurping "iic"'s cdevsw[]

Re: Some interrupt bogons still around.

1999-05-13 Thread Jake Burkholder
my stock SB16 + freebsd+x11amp hasn't worked right since newbus. sound skips quite a bit. /me too I noticed the same thing. /usr/ports/audio/gqmpeg is a nice player which uses mpg123 as the backend; it plays fine. I think it may have just have something to do with x11amp, which

config nit

1999-04-25 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hi, I just noticed that after all the dequote stuff went into config (great work!) options NO_F00F_HACK still needs quotes. Its interpreted as NO_F0F_HACK without them; to be expected I guess. This should probably be reflected in LINT. Thanks, Jake -- we are but packets in the internet of

new-bus, pcm, and matcd (was Re: new-bus breaks both sound drivers)

1999-04-23 Thread Jake Burkholder
mp3s aren't playing quite right with x11amp though, little skips here and there, they work fine with the old kernel. mpg123 seems fine, as does the sound in FXTV. I'll try making the world again. Was there ever any resolution/further inspection of this? Not as far I know; its still

Re: new-bus breaks both sound drivers

1999-04-17 Thread Jake Burkholder
Hmm, you might like to try this patch and see what happens, there is a missing old driver wrapper for the pcm stuff. As a result, it's not getting run from the isa probe. Regarding the other driver, I'm not sure what's going on there as the hooks appear to be present. Right on, that patch