On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
tree the branch tag to use is now RELENG_9_0, if you use . (head)
you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
via SVN it is
On 18/11/2011 18:21, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Luchesar V. ILIEV
luchesar.il...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
tree the branch tag to use is now RELENG_9_0, if you
On 11/11/2011 20:33, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear all ,
Instead of using Current and then renaming everything for a new version
number ,
is it not possible to
On 11/11/2011 21:07, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
On 11/11/2011 20:33, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear all ,
Instead of using Current and then renaming everything
On 24/10/2011 14:59, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:31:25 pm Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
Speaking of that, and in the context of the recursion that svnversion
does, something else comes to my mind...
svnversion is currently executed in ${SRCDIR}/sys, so the revision
number
On 22/10/2011 18:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I tried following:
(1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
return status == 0
prints out exported
time:
real0m0.043s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.045s
(2) Run svnversion in svn