David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 08:19:09AM -0600, Nathan Kinsman wrote:
> > I've been doing some compiler benchmarks with AMD K3-450 and CURRENT
>
> Hum... K6-3/450 I assume.
Yes, K6-3/450. Long night...
>
> > D) -s -O3
I've been doing some compiler benchmarks with AMD K3-450 and CURRENT
with GCC 2.95.2. If anyone is interested in the results, here they
are. I'm doing performance profiling for our future 4.0 rollout.
The K6 processor is dead hardware, but I still use them for clustered
machines in a couple we
ly message:
afd0: reading primary partition table: error reading fsbn 0
If only because it may seem to some users to be a problem, when there is
none.
Regards,
Nathan Kinsman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
sed cards? Perhaps spending more on a
NIC could justify a lower powered CPU.
> --
> \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith
> \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ [
r, or even
Kingston, but it seems that the Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+ is currently
the best option. I understand the 3C905 may also be good, but it lacks
an onboard processor. Anything with better performance and lower CPU
utilization then the EtherExpress PRO/100+??
Thanks for any assistance.
No solutions for you, but I have had the same exact problems with
Current and Ip Filter 3.3.3. Giving up.
Current Ip Filter works fine on 3.3-STABLE. Can't hardly wait for 4.0
to be stable and released, I'm not happy with my current mangling of
different compilers in STABLE.
_
Nath
