Re: additional queue macro

2002-07-03 Thread Neal Fachan
his should work, even > > though we know it won't. but it doesn't crash.. it just terminates on the > > first transfer because it reaches the end of the queue.. the suspend queue > > that is.. > > TAILQ_FOREACH_REMOVABLE or TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE > (I prefer the

Re: additional queue macro

2002-07-03 Thread Neal Fachan
I agree that it's unfortunately named. The idea was that it's safe to remove from within the iterator, not that the iterator is doing the removing... On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:04:53PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Neal Fachan wrote: > >