Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:01:23 -0500 (EST) Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. Just wondering if, when one is announced, you could include in this messages the release date forecast. -- Cogeco ergo sum pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 attach returned 6
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:55:39 -0700 peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I saw this post on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-May/002982.html on Mon May 12 22:36:58 PDT 2003. I am having problems with my nic card. I also got the device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 attach returned 6 exept, of course, mine was with the nic card - not the keyboard so the driver was dl0 not atkbd0. Anyway the point is, did you fix this? Do you know what the message means and what causes it? I'm just looking for somthing to point me in the right direction. I've looked around and I haven't been able to find too many resources. I hope you can give me some pointers, but if not don't worry. Thanks for taking the time to read this. I worked around this by manually setting (in BIOS) the IRQ for the PCI slot that NIC was sitting on. Auto mode was giving the NIC IRQ 9 and I set it manually to IRQ 10. -- Cogeco ergo sum pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700 Cliff L. Biffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast. Is that just a -CURRENT thing, I can't see anything like that in -STABLE's LINT. -- Cogeco ergo sum msg48275/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test program and run it. The output should look like this: ./pt Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbff9fc - 0xbfbff9c0 If you get a signal or any of the other registers change their value, please let me know. I've tested this on a Pentium III mobile, a K6-II, and an Athlon. The program cmopiles ok on both stable and current. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1210.79-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x642 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE, MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR AMD Features=0xc044b18,AMIE,DSP,3DNow! [earth] /home/paul/temp: uname -v FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 27 03:19:35 EST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EARTH [earth] /home/paul/temp: ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffa54 - 0xbfbffa18 -- Cogeco ergo sum msg38778/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 3Com 3c905C-TX
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:08:02 +0300 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0x3000-0x307f mem 0xfa001000-0xfa00107f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2 at 100baseTX full-duplex is slower than 10Mgb :-( I recently had a similar problem. My switch (Netgear FS105) needs the adaptor to *announce* itself as full duplex. Try turning OFF full-duplex in your ifconfig and see if there is a speed-up. -- Cogeco ergo sum msg37860/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
